Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bernad
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar

play fullscreen
1 / 37
Download Presentation
Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar
452 Views
Download Presentation

Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Performance Program2019 Regional Rules Seminar PLEASE TRY TO SIT AT A TABLE WHICH DESIGNATES YOUR INSTITUTION’S DIVISION

  2. Agenda Introduction and resources: • Updates to IPP data management system. • Demonstration of IPP. • Admissions case study. • Peer group development case study. • How to build a report for department/institutional leadership. • Key takeaways and questions.

  3. IPP Resources

  4. Updates • Health and safety data. • Division II Proposal 2019-5. • Division III Proposal 2019-4. • Ability to designate/restrict access to data. • Recent updates to IPP.

  5. Case Study No. 1 Academic Admissions

  6. Case Study No. 1: Facts • Titan University is a Division I FBS institution. • Titan University football staff is recruiting Ronnie “Sunshine” Bass. • Rising senior at T.C. Williams High School. • Holds state records for touchdown and passing yards. • Is the defending state 100-meter champion. • Ronnie’s academic record is as follows: • 2.30 core-course GPA. • 960 SAT (seven attempts).

  7. Case Study No. 1 Questions: • Is Ronnie Bass admissible? • Can Ronnie be academically successful at Titan University? • What do you need to know? • How can IPP help you?

  8. Case Study No. 1 How Can IPP Assist? • Academic outcome data indicators. • Division I Academic Progress Rate. • Eligibility and retention. • Graduation rates. • Academic initial-eligibility. • Core-course GPA. • Scholastic Assessment Test score.

  9. Case Study No. 1: How Can IPP Assist?

  10. Case Study No. 1

  11. Case Study No. 1 Single-Year APR – Football

  12. Case Study No. 1 Eligibility Rate – Football

  13. Case Study No. 1 Retention Rate – Football

  14. Case Study No. 1 Discussion: What else do you need or want to know? • Academic support services available for at-risk SAs? • Inside and outside of athletics? • Number of at-risk SAs on current team? • Number of at-risk SAs currently enrolled? • Current (special) admission standards for your institution? • How far is Ronnie away from meeting standards?

  15. Case Study No. 2 Peer Group Formation Fiscal Management/Peer Group Comparisons

  16. Case Study No. 2: Facts • D2U is a Division II public institution. • Jill is D2U’s head women’s soccer coach. • Hired in November 2015. • D2U’s record in Jill’s first three seasons: 2016: 2-13-3 2017: 5-9-4 2018: 4-10-3

  17. Case Study No. 2: Facts, cont. • In December 2018, Jill asserts her program is underfunded. • Scholarships. • Coach’s salary. • Recruiting budget. • Jill wants to field a championship team. • Does she have the necessary funding?

  18. Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection • Division II Women’s Soccer Teams. • Division II Women’s Soccer Teams + Public Institutions. • 2018 Division II Women’s Soccer NCAA Championship Field.

  19. Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection STEP 2: Choose Women’s Soccer and Public Step 3: Type School Name(s) Step 1: Choose Division II

  20. Case Study No. 2 1 3 2

  21. Case Study No. 2Total Scholarship Dollars – Women’s Soccer

  22. Case Study No. 2 Equivalencies – Women’s Soccer

  23. Case Study No. 2Head Coach Compensation – Women’s Soccer

  24. Case Study No. 2Assistant Coach Compensation

  25. Case Study No. 2Recruiting Expenses

  26. Case Study No. 2 Discussion: • Is head coach Jill’s assertion correct? • Is her program underfunded? • What other considerations are relevant for your meeting?

  27. Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting

  28. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting

  29. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Discussion: • Please review the case study at your tables. • What is most important to your president/chancellor? • What is most important to convey your priorities? • What can highlight/detract from your presentation? • How can IPP help?

  30. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Report for President/Chancellor: • Athletics department expenses and revenues. • Percentage of institutional budget. • Academic outcome data. • Leadership demographics.

  31. Case Study No. 3IPP Reporting Additional Peer Groups: • Potential conference realignment. • In-state competitors. • National competitors. • Football.

  32. Case Study No. 3Financial Data Indicators

  33. Case Study No. 3Academic Data Indicators

  34. Case Study No. 3Demographic Data Indicators

  35. Questions? Jennifer Samble (jsamble@ncaa.org) Steve Clar (sclar@ncaa.org) ipp@ncaa.org

  36. We Want Your Feedback Your input is important. Rate this session using the survey on the Regional Rules Seminar app.