taxonomies and faceted navigation getting the best of both l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated on

Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both. Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services Agenda. Introduction: Essentials of Facets and Taxonomies Implementing Facets and Taxonomies

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Taxonomies and Faceted Navigation Getting the Best of Both Tom ReamyChief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

    2. Agenda • Introduction: Essentials of Facets and Taxonomies • Implementing Facets and Taxonomies • Combining Taxonomies and Facets • Conclusion

    3. KAPS Group: General • Knowledge Architecture Professional Services • Virtual Company: Network of consultants – 12-15 • Partners – Convera, Inxight, FAST, etc. • Consulting, Strategy, Knowledge architecture audit • Taxonomies: Enterprise, Marketing, Insurance, etc. • Services: • Taxonomy development, consulting, customization • Technology Consulting – Search, CMS, Portals, etc. • Metadata standards and implementation • Knowledge Management: Collaboration, Expertise, e-learning • Applied Theory – Faceted taxonomies, complexity theory, natural categories

    4. Faceted Navigation: The Next Revolution • Faceted navigation will change enterprise search! • Faceted navigation will change the way business works! • Faceted navigation means the end of taxonomies! • Faceted navigation means no more metadata! • Faceted navigation will eventually replace search! • Faceted navigation will remove rust, polish your silver, feed the hungry, clothe the poor, and bring world peace! • To All the Above – NAH!

    5. Essentials of Facets • Facets are not categories • Entities or concepts belong to a category • Entities have facets • Facets are metadata - properties or attributes • Entities or concepts fit into one or more categories • All entities have all facets – defined by set of values • Facets are orthogonal – mutually exclusive – dimensions • An event is not a person is not a document is not a place. • Facets – variety – of units, of structure • Numerical range (price), Location – big to small • Alphabetical, Hierarchical - taxonomic

    6. History of Facets • S. R. Ranganathan – 1960’s (Taxonomies – Aristotle) • Issue of Compound Subjects • The Universe consists of PMEST • Personality, Matter, Energy, Space, Time • Classification Research Group- 1950’s, 1970’s • Facet analysis as basis for all bibliographic classifications • Based on Ranganathan, simplified • Principles: • Division – a facet must represent only one characteristic • Mutual Exclusivity • More flexible, less doctrinaire • Classification Theory to Web Implementation • An Idea waiting for a technology - Multiple Filters / dimensions

    7. Essentials of TaxonomiesInternal Organization • A hierarchy does not a taxonomy make. • Taxonomy, browse structure, file structure • Thesaurus, catalog, controlled vocabulary • Two basic meanings – Formal and Browse • Formal Taxonomy – parent – child relationship • Is-A-Kind-Of ---- Animal – Mammal – Zebra • Partonomy – Is-A-Part-Of ---- US-California-Oakland • Browse Classification – cluster of related concepts • Food and Dining – Catering - Restaurants

    8. Essentials of Taxonomies • Taxonomies are multiple purpose • Indexing, browsing, communication, applications • Taxonomies deal with complex, not compound • Conceptual relationships – category membership • Contextual relationships – Computers & Software • Taxonomies deal with semantics • Facets are mostly about things and their properties • Taxonomies applied to documents • Multiple meanings and purposes • Essential attributes of documents are not single value

    9. Taxonomies and Facets – SummaryIs This a Facet? • Important! A facet is not the same as top level categories in a taxonomy. • Simple View: • Taxonomies = complex concepts that are applied to documents • Facets = one dimension of things • More Complicated • Documents are things – can have facet attributes – example – ContentType (format to purpose) • Facets can have hierarchical structure • Hybrid facets can have a taxonomic structure

    10. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Essentials of Faceted Navigation • Not a Yahoo-style Browse • Computer Stores under Computers and Internet • One value per facet per entity • Faceted Navigation • Facets are filters, multidimensional • Browse within a facet, filter by multiple facets • Facets are applied at search time – post-coordination, not pre-coordination [Advanced Search] • Faceted Navigation is an active interface – dynamic combination of search and browse

    11. A Sideways Look at Faceted NavigationMiles wants a Pinot NoirAnd he doesn’t want any ____________ Merlot!

    12. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Faceted Navigation: Advantages • More intuitive – easy to guess what is behind each door • Simplicity of internal organization • 20 questions – we know and use • Dynamic selection of categories • Allow multiple perspectives • Ability to Handle Compound Subjects • Trick Users into “using” Advanced Search • wine where color = red, price = x-y, etc. • Click on color red, click on price x-y, etc.

    13. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Faceted Navigation: Advantages • Systematic Advantages: • Need fewer Elements • 4 facets of 10 nodes = 10,000 node taxonomy • Content Management Advantages: • Easier to “categorize” – not as conceptual • Fewer = simple, can use auto-classification better • Flexible – can add new facets, elements in facet

    14. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Faceted Navigation: Disadvantages • Lack of Standards for Faceted Classifications • Every project is unique customization • Difficulty of expressing complex relationships • Simplicity of internal organization • Loss of Browse Context • Difficult to grasp scope and relationships • Essential Limit of Faceted Navigation • Limited Domain Applicability – type and size • Entities not concepts, documents, web sites • Trade off between simplicity (power and ease of understanding) and complexity (real world)

    15. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies When to Use Faceted Navigation • Type of Collections • Small to medium sized sets of things • Homogenous set of entities • Arbitrary Categorization of Domain • Taxonomy of Office Supplies – yes • Taxonomy of Life, Life Insurance – no. • Nature of the domain and tasks • Multi-dimensional area – no single hierarchy • Nature of Important distinctions • Can Create a Complete Set of Facets • 3 or more mutually exclusive dimensions

    16. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Taxonomy: Advantages • Rich Context • Related concepts – Generalization and specification • Browse – variety of types of relationships • Standard taxonomies available • Build on work of others • Communication with others • Multi-purpose • Search – indexing, keywords • Semantic signature of document • Browse – conceptual context • Applications - Alerts based on meaning in a document

    17. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Taxonomy: Advantages • Knowledge Representation • Higher level relationships • User focus – their concept levels, nomenclature • Faceted Taxonomies • Advantages – smaller, scalability, conceptual clarity • More complex, conceptual entities and relationships • When to use: • Size of element set • Complexity of domain – concepts, documents, web pages

    18. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies Taxonomy: Disadvantages • Large, difficult to develop • Pre-coordinated - can’t anticipate all of user’s needs • Formal taxonomies do not represent user’s perspective • Taxonomies are more difficult to use – often not clear where to go • More difficult to use with auto-categorization • Expensive

    19. Implementing Facets and Taxonomies When to Use Taxonomies • Complex Relationships • If target is understand a rich set of related resources – yes • If target is to buy an object - no • Semantic • If meaning in documents is primary – yes • If targets are things or data documents - no • Primary content is rich collection of documents • Documents not about two or three things – multiple concepts, aboutness and minor topics • Full text index mapped to taxonomy – support multiple perspectives into content, different purposes

    20. Combining Facets and TaxonomiesDevelopment Issues – Facets • Reflect current usage – expert community and user community • Flexibility – allows for additions of new subject, facets, entities at any point in the system • Match the structure to domain and task • Users can understand different structures • General: chronological, alphabetical, spatial, simple to complex, size or quantity, hierarchical, canonical • Precision of unit values – very important!

    21. Combining Facets and TaxonomiesDevelopment Issues – Facets • Facetization of Taxonomy • Same structure in multiple places in a taxonomy • Hidden elements – get at with user focus • Content type – Presentation, Well Report • Level of Structure related to size of domain • Alphabetical – list, range • Number of Facets vs. Internal structure • People – list or sub-structure – organizations, functions, etc. • Labeling • Systematic coherence vs. user labels, tasks

    22. Combining Facets and TaxonomiesDesign Issues • Bad • Single set of facets, select and browse • It’s just another category • “Faceted” Search • It’s just advanced search • Better • Combination of single facet browse and search • Good • Multiple facet browse and search • Balance – purity of facets (easy to understand) with reflecting user’s world view and tasks

    23. Combining Facets and TaxonomiesDesign Issues • Dominant Dimension • Semantic focus • Single Facet – Hotel = location • Equal facets or Main and Secondary facets • Number of facets, user population • Mixed paths or dedicated facet interface • – specials, time sensitive facets • Facets within taxonomy – browse by wine type, then apply price, region facets

    24. Facets and Taxonomies – Sample ImplementationsRich Information Access • Combining Subject Matter and Topical Facets • Organization, Assets, Activities + Topics • Browse Topics and filter by Assets & Activities • Quality control for drilling new well in region X • Geography facet and terrorism taxonomy • Bomb making in Sudan • Adding Attributes – Global and Local • Content Types – presentations, well reports, policy • Price – only shows up if intersection contains items with price metadata

    25. Facets and Taxonomies – Sample Implementations Complex Work Space • Combine faceted taxonomies, attribute facets, file structure • People, Things, Events + Content Type • File structure – where local group stores sets of related documents • Links to wider universe • Targeted links – by category, facet dimensions • Find related people or policy documents • Advantage of global context and local fast access

    26. Facets and Taxonomies – Sample Implementations Ontologies and Alerts • Ontology is a model of the relationships of a particular domain. • Vice President – Related to • Other people, HR policies, business activities • Security rights, other implied behaviors • Alerts – Software – entity extraction, facet extraction • Old – if terms x,y,z appear • Better – complex search – Near, Not, InSentence • Better – Contains any of type x entity or facet (products), plus complex conceptual content, plus certain values within a facet (buying activity), then send alert

    27. Basic Six Dimensions People individuals and communities Event Location Time Entities/ Things Information Resource – types Custom Facets / Taxonomies Products / Services Applications / Technologies Combine with subject matter taxonomies (MESH, etc.) Ontologies General Business relationships Industry specific Biotech Research Pipelines Faceted Taxonomy – ExampleKAPS Group Enterprise Taxonomy

    28. Conclusion • Taxonomies and facets are both part of intellectual infrastructure – supports multiple approaches, applications • Dynamic classification is better than pre-coordinated structures • Combine formal power with ability to support multiple user perspectives • Formal taxonomies are best for dynamic classification • Find the right blend of pure facets, hybrid facets, taxonomies, faceted taxonomies, ontologies, etc. • Design for your situation – eCommerce or Enterprise • Compound and Complex work, Complicated doesn’t

    29. Questions? Tom KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services