1 / 57

Effects of technological change on learning, qualifications and assessment

Qualifications for the Future SQA, 1 November 2007. Effects of technological change on learning, qualifications and assessment. Ray Land, University of Strathclyde. print culture and the digital turn shifts in the nature of knowledge the challenge to academic authority

bennyb
Download Presentation

Effects of technological change on learning, qualifications and assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Qualifications for the Future SQA, 1 November 2007 Effects of technological change on learning, qualifications and assessment Ray Land, University of Strathclyde

  2. print culture and the digital turn • shifts in the nature of knowledge • the challenge to academic authority • the academy and speed (Virilio) • temporalities – slow and fast time (Eriksen) • the five-minute university (Novello) • liminality (Meyer & Land) • troublesome knowledge (Perkins) • prometheus bound? possible appropriation and repurposing of web 2.0

  3. more than 70m blogs on the internet; • 195,000 new blogs are created every day (two • every second). • dominant languages are Chinese, Japanese • and English • there are 1.8m blog posts a day. • MySpace the busiest website in the world • (120m registered users) • YouTube grows in value more than $100m a • month • Source: Technorati 2007

  4. 62% of content created by users under age 21 is • generated by someone they know • 57% of teenagers create content for the Internet • 73% of students use the internet more than the library • teenagers average four hours a day on television, • the web and SMS

  5. text stability individual private

  6. image mutability collective public

  7. web as application architecture of participation user-owned data rich, interactive interfaces no walled gardens

  8. [Taken from Dempsey, L.The (Digital) Library Environment: Ten Years Afterhttp://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/dempsey/]

  9. Speed and collective action eg • Katrinalist.net • Wikipedia

  10. Great Northern War • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia • Jump to: navigation, search • This is an article about the 18th century war. For wars with similar names see Northern Seven Years' War (1563–1570), Northern Wars (1655–1661) and the Flagstaff War (1845–1846) in New Zealand • Great Northern War • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia • Jump to: navigation, search • This is an article about the 18th century war. For wars with similar names see Northern Seven Years' War (1563–1570), Northern Wars (1655–1661) and the Flagstaff War (1845–1846) in New Zealand The Great Northern War - Wikipedia • Between 1560 and 1660, Sweden created a Baltic empire centered on the Gulf of Finland and comprising the provinces of Karelia, Ingria, Estonia, and Livonia. During the Thirty Years' War Sweden gained tracts in Germany as well, including Western Pomerania, Wismar, the Duchy of Bremen, and Verden. At the same period Sweden conquered Danish and some Norwegian provinces north of the Sound (1645; 1660). These victories may be ascribed to a good training of the army, which was far more professional than most continental armies, and could maintain much higher rates of fire due to constant training with their firearms. However, Sweden was unable to support and maintain her army when the war was prolonged and the costs of warfare could not be passed to occupied countries. • In 1617 Sweden's gains in the Treaty of Stolbovo had deprived Russia of direct access to the Baltic Sea, and internal strife during much of the first half of the 1600s meant that they were never in a position to challenge Sweden for these gains. Russian fortunes reversed during the later half of the 17th century, notably with the rise to power of Peter the Great, who looked to address the earlier losses and re-establish a Baltic presence. In the late 1690s, the adventurer Johann Patkul managed to ally Russia with Denmark and Saxony and in 1700 the three powers attacked. Battle of Poltava as painted by Denis Martens the Younger in 1726 The Great Northern War was the war fought between a coalition of Russia, Denmark-Norway, and Saxony-Poland (from 1715 also Prussia and Hanover) on one side and Sweden with some help from the Ottoman Empire on the other side from 1700 to 1721. It started by a coordinated attack on Sweden by the coalition in 1700, and ended in 1721 with the conclusion of the Treaty of Nystad, and the Stockholm treaties. A result of the war was the end of the Swedish Empire. Russia supplanted Sweden as the dominant Power on the Baltic Sea and became a major player in European politics. Battle of Poltava as painted by Denis Martens the Younger in 1726 The Great Northern War was the war fought between a coalition of Russia, Denmark-Norway, and Saxony-Poland (from 1715 also Prussia and Hanover) on one side and Sweden with some help from the Ottoman Empire on the other side from 1700 to 1721. It started by a coordinated attack on Sweden by the coalition in 1700, and ended in 1721 with the conclusion of the Treaty of Nystad, and the Stockholm treaties. A result of the war was the end of the Swedish Empire. Russia supplanted Sweden as the dominant Power on the Baltic Sea and became a major player in European politics. [edit] Background [edit] Background

  11. Personal • ‘me’ media • Time Life magazine –’You’ • YouTube • MySpace • FaceBook • Flickr

  12. ‘If you're not on MySpace, you don't exist’ • ‘the collectivity fad’ • Digital Maoism (Lanier) • ‘the hive mind’ (Kelly)

  13. “These sections of the web break away from the page metaphor. Rather than following the notion of the web as book, they are predicated on microcontent. Blogs are about posts, not pages. Wikis are streams of conversation, revision, amendment, and truncation.” Alexander, 2006

  14. open text – loss of closure and fixity of printed page– a shift in epistemology • shift in medium implies shift in reading mode, from literacy to multiliteracy, technoliteracy, visual sophistication, multimodality (Kress)

  15. the body of the book = the body of knowledge – makes it stable and ‘graspable’ volatility and instability of digital text – infinitely editable, instantly distributable, methods for imposing fixity and authorial control (pdf, page scanning, restricted access) work against rather than with the mode of digitality

  16. Shifts in epistemology: how Web 2.0 is transforming HE • process over artefact • consensus & trust over authority • exploration over exposition • emergence & novelty over argument • open text / the rigour of no completion • convenience & speed overriding quality • knowledge network/ access over possession • public/private continuum

  17. authority gatekeeping – mark poster’s exploration of how digitisation shifts history as a discipline – breaking down boundaries – if all historical resources are ‘googled’, if all history work is instantly publishable, how does that affect who counts as an historian? or a journalist? what is the role of the university, of the discipline?

  18. institutional control • textual instability as a reflection of instability in the academy’s idea of itself (Barnett 2005) • media implicated in the academy’s inability to claim universality in its pursuit of Truth

  19. supercomplexity we now live in a world of radical contestation and challengeability, a world of uncertainty and unpredictability. In such a world, all such notions—as truth, fairness, accessibility and knowledge—come in for scrutiny. In such a process of continuing reflexivity, fundamental concepts do not dissolve but, on the contrary, become systematically elaborated…

  20. In this process of infinite elaboration, concepts are broken open and subjected to multiple interpretations; and these interpretations may, and often do, conflict. As a result, we no longer have stable ways even of describing the world that we are in; the world becomes multiple worlds. (Barnett 2005 p.789)

  21. The risks of Web 2.0: The DEFRA wiki

  22. Speed (Virilio 1999) The age demanded an image Of its accelerated grimace, Something for the modern stage Ezra Pound 1920

  23. rise of digital information technologies located firmly within the neo-liberal ideology of globalisation, and seen as caught inexorably within a logic of ‘fast time’, increasing acceleration and exponential growth of information.

  24. ‘Our history is the history of acceleration’ Virilio, 2000:51 the defining characteristic of early twenty-first century society, and an increasing source of its hazards, is its relentless acceleration and compression of time. ‘“Faster, smaller, cheaper” – this NASA slogan could shortly become the watchword of globalisation itself’ (Virilio 2000:66). ‘Speed is power itself’Virilio 1999:15

  25. the ‘tyranny of the moment’ - effects of speed (Eriksen 2001) • speed is an addictive drug • speed leads to simplification • speed creates assembly line (Taylorist) effects • speed leads to a loss of precision • speed demands space (filling in all the available gaps in the lives of others) • speed is contagious – when experienced in one domain the desire for speed tends to spread to new domains. • gains and losses equal each other out so that increased speed does not necessarily even lead to greater efficiency.

  26. death of geography • loss of political space • advent of universal real time • loss of slow time • ‘presentified’ history • single gaze of the cyclops • erosion of liberty

  27. textualities and temporalities fast and slow time (Eriksen)

  28. Web 2.0 practices seem caught in an awkward tension, if not disjunction. The pedagogical claims made for them seem to be located within, and to require the integrative and deliberative logic of, what Eriksen characterises as slow time. Slow and fast time (Eriksen 2001)

  29. Slow and fast time (Eriksen) As digital phenomena, however, they increasingly serve to constitute fast time, can only accelerate in their future modus operandi, and reinforce the dromocratic principle that fast time drives out and occupies the place of slow time.

  30. Duration (shortening attention spans) Temporal location (internet always on) Sequence (loss of continuity) Deadlines (positioned differently in a task, temporal shifts) Cycles (Constantly renegotiated, simultaneuously operating) Rhythms (condensing and dispersal of working effort; new patterns of busy-ness) Presence / absence, co-presence our experience of time in the media conditions of the internet(Lee & Liebenau 2000).

  31. Distanciation (Giddens) The structuring of time–space distanciation relies on such social relations as “presence-availability ”—the organization of presence, absence proximity and availability, and the degree of co-present activities in relation to “tele-present” activities.

  32. Notion that students in the digital age are ‘never away’ but permanently networked

  33. the five minute universityFr. Guido Sarducci, rock critic, l’Osservatore Romano, Vatican. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO8x8eoU3L4

  34. impact on academic estate

  35. public/private continuum • displacement of slow time to the domestic sphere • domestic privacy compromised by 24/7 digital

  36. Liminality & troublesome knowledge (Meyer and Land 2006) liminality, the transformative threshold space and process in which (necessarily) troublesome knowledge is negotiated and conceptual difficulty encountered and overcome (Perkins 2006, Meyer and Land 2006) seems truncated by fast time and the linear, trouble-free ‘consumptive’ academy it ushers in.

  37. asking for trouble The liminal state permits an integration of new knowledge into a new way of seeing, a re-conceptualisation. It is the state of trouble, stuckness, letting go and changed subjectivity, without which the possibility of things being otherwise is unlikely to come into view. It is the space of meaning-making.

  38. Troublesome knowledge • ritual knowledge • inert knowledge • conceptually difficult knowledge • the defended learner • alien knowledge • tacit knowledge • troublesome language EARLI 2007 Budapest August 31st

  39. Liminality • a transformative state that engages existing certainties and renders them problematic, and fluid • a suspended state in which understanding can approximate to a kind of mimicry or lack of authenticity • liminality as unsettling – sense of loss EARLI 2007 Budapest August 31st

  40. looking for trouble • Knowledge is troublesome for a variety of reasons (Perkins 2006). It might be alien, inert, tacit, conceptually difficult, counter-intuitive, characterised by an inaccessible ‘underlying game’, or characterised by supercomplexity. • such troublesomeness and disquietude is purposeful, as it is the provoker of change that cannot be assimilated, and hence is the instigator of new learning and new ontological possibility. EARLI 2007 Budapest August 31st

  41. East of Eden through the threshold EARLI 2007 Budapest August 31st

  42. Janus – divinity of the threshold epistemological ontological EARLI 2007 Budapest August 31st

  43. ‘Strangeness’ as the new universal (Barnett 2005) “The new universal is precisely the capacity to cope, to prosper and to delight in a world in which there are no universals.” Barnett, 2005 contestability and challengeability radical uncertainty and unpredictability teaching: from knowledge to being

  44. prometheus bound? Can the 21st academy appropriate and re-purpose social technologies to discover new contemplative, transformative and perhaps creative liminal spaces? Or are such notions a nostalgic residue of print culture? Does digital culture usher in (fast) new modes of thinking, creativity and decision-making?

More Related