p5 and the particle physics roadmap l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 25

P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 540 Views
  • Uploaded on

P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz Chair of P5 Outline of Talk What is P5 Why is it needed Roadmap Prioritization Activities Activities to Date

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap' - benjamin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
p5 and the particle physics roadmap

P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap

A. Seiden

UC Santa Cruz

Chair of P5

outline of talk
Outline of Talk

What is P5

Why is it needed

Roadmap

Prioritization Activities

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

activities to date
Activities to Date

P5 is a new committee. It is a HEPAP Subpanel, reporting to the DOE and NSF through HEPAP. Charge: Maintain the roadmap for the field and provide prioritization among projects, when requested by the agencies.

Activities to date:

(1) P5 had a major role, along with HEPAP, in providing input for the field for Ray Orbach’s plan for future facilities for the DOE Office of Science.

(2) In 2003 provided first P5 roadmap for the field. The roadmap should be updated every two years. Also, provided prioritization for three projects, all at Fermilab.

(3) In 2004, follow-up on 2003 report, providing more detailed guidance on scheduling for one of the projects at Fermilab.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

p5 membership
P5 Membership

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

p5 and the particle physics roadmap5
P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap

Community Defines

Compelling Science

Projects

If between

$50 M and $600 M

P5 Review

andPrioritization

P5

Roadmap

MatureProject

Significant

Support

Ready for Construction

P5 review looks at Science, Budgets, International Context, and Competing Options

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

projects on the roadmap
Projects on the Roadmap

Objective: To understand the nature of matter, energy, space and time, linking nature on the microscopic and macroscopic levels. Projects on the roadmap provide a diverse and interconnected research program that aims to keep the U.S. among the world leaders in this area of exploration.

Particle Physics has been very successful at developing a theory that explains on a microscopic level the interactions of ordinary matter and we are now confronting the next set of exciting questions: what is the dark matter that is responsible for herding particles into galaxies, what is the dark energy that is accelerating the expansion of the universe, how should we understand the vacuum, how many dimensions does space really have, what is the deeper relationship between the several types of forces and particles that we have discovered and what is their impact on the evolution of the universe?

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

p5 and the particle physics roadmap7
P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap

Why P5? An explosion of opportunities based on new discoveries as well as new technological innovations. Requires stewardship.

Ten years ago the primary expensive particle physics projects were at the national laboratories. These each ran their own autonomous programs, each guided by their own Scientific Policy Committee and Program Advisory Committee, with general policy guidance from HEPAP.

Now the field is much more complex:

(1) Our highest priority project toward the end of this decade will be at a foreign laboratory (LHC at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland with the U.S. having the most participants of any country).

(2) Our highest long term priority is a Linear Collider, which will be an international project where the U.S. institutions must cooperate extensively.

(3) There are many proposals for expensive particle astrophysics projects at the intersection of particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

p5 and the particle physics roadmap8
P5 and the Particle Physics Roadmap

Despite these changes, the laboratory – university partnership that has characterized particle physics brings enormous resources to the full range of experiments: projects at accelerators, in space, under ice and under ground. Innovations in accelerators, detectors, electronics and computing continue to enable scientific advances.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

roadmap as of 2003
Roadmap as of 2003

R&D is marked in yellow, construction in green, and operation in blue.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

slide11
`

During the 20th century the quest to broaden our view of the universe has shown us the vastness of the universe and revealed violent cosmic phenomena and mysteries

slide12

g

e-

e+

GLAST

AGN

particle astrophysics on the roadmap
Particle Astrophysics on the Roadmap

GLAST

GLAST is a project jointly supported by the DOE and NASA with SLAC playing a leading role. It is an example of the important and growing role of interagency collaboration. The primary detector technology used in the experiment, silicon strip detectors, was developed by the particle physics community. The science objectives, spanning astrophysics and particle physics, can be broadly categorized into four themes:

  • Understand the mechanisms of particle acceleration in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), Pulsars, and Super Nova Remnants.
  • Resolve the gamma-ray sky: unidentified sources and diffuse emission.
  • Determine the high-energy behavior of gamma-ray bursts and transients.
  • Probe dark matter and the early Universe.

ICECUBE

This is an NSF initiative sponsored jointly by the Physics Division and the Office of Polar Programs, with LBNL having an important role. As in the case of other projects in the field, many universities as well as international partners are involved, with the University of Wisconsin playing a leading role. The physics objectives are similar to GLAST but neutrinos can come directly from deep in the energy source. Sensitive to the presence of particles that decay into neutrinos within the energy source.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

this seems to be true
This seems to be true!

The universe is filled with something called “Dark Energy” which is accelerating its expansion.

It is also filled with something (called the Higgs field) which gives particles mass.

What are these fundamental “somethings”? Will we some day see a relation? The underlying mechanism for both phenomena are not understood.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

slide16

Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

slide17

LHC on the Roadmap

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a new accelerator scheduled to start operation in 2007, is under construction at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. This accelerator will explore nature at the shortest distances (a factor of seven high energy than the present highest energy machine) ever studied in detail. Scientists throughout the world are participating, and the U.S. Government is making a major contribution through programs funded by the NSF and the DOE. Some of the exciting goals:

  • Study the nature of the vacuum and how it gives mass to particles and breaks the symmetry between forces.
  • Study the physics framework behind the symmetry breaking.
  • Search for extra Spatial Dimensions.
  • Search for Quantum Dimensions (Supersymmetry).
  • Search for the physics responsible for dark matter, for example as occurs in supersymmetry.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

neutrino oscillations

W





NeutrinoOscillations

Quantum Mechanics in Action in the Particle World

Oscillations exist between 3 neutrino types.

Short Journey

W





Detector

Long Journey

Gives  time to change character

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

atmospheric neutrinos



Detector



Cosmic ray

Atmospheric Neutrinos

Diameter of the earth provides “Long Journey”

Super K Detector

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

slide20

The Growing Excitement of Neutrino Physics

American Physical Society Multi-Divisional Neutrino Study over the past year to map out future opportunities has now concluded.

Sponsored by the APS Divisions of:

Nuclear Physics

Particles and Fields

Astrophysics

Physics of Beams

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

neutrino physics agenda
Neutrino Physics Agenda

Craft a program to:

  • Tell us if there are only 3 neutrino families.
  • Complete measurements of masses and mixing parameters for the neutrinos.
  • Tell us if neutrinos are their own antiparticles.

Related theoretical questions:

  • Are neutrinos responsible for the excess of matter over anti-matter?
  • What can neutrinos tell us about new physics beyond the Standard Model?

Use neutrinos as a tool to study Astrophysics:

  • Probe processes that generate energy in the sun.
  • Look at super-nova explosions.
  • Study cosmic sources of very high-energy particles.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

prioritization
Prioritization

I believe the agencies are still learning how to use P5.

The first request for prioritization involved three projects at Fermilab. These needed rapid decisions since any further delays risked jeopardizing the timeliness of the projects.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

prioritization for three projects
Prioritization for Three Projects

Highest Priority: The Fermilab Tevatron Run II Upgrades, which involve two detectors taking data at the energy frontier. P5 advocated that Fermilab try to maximize the physics-quality data recorded by each experiment by the end of 2008. Requires upgrades to the trigger and data acquisition systems of each experiment. Supported the Fermilab management’s decision that the separate silicon detector upgrades not be built given the cost, schedule, and luminosity expectations for the accelerator.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

prioritization for three projects24
Prioritization for Three Projects

The other two experiments were in the area of quark flavor physics. Both were excellent experiments that could start to take data at the end of this decade. These experiments would look at the imprint of the new physics found at the LHC in the decays of heavy quarks, providing a tool to help decipher the character of that new physics. We recommended that the broader of the two move forward and that the second experiment not proceed based on current budgetary models.

Note that budgetary considerations, after many years of funding stringencies for the field, now play a very large role in limiting opportunities.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004

prioritization25
Prioritization

For the future, I believe it would be better to look at a larger set of projects, for example a set that could start construction within a 5 year time window. These compete directly for funds. This is complicated by the fact that some of the projects involve more than just the NSF and the DOE Office of High Energy Physics. However, we can certainly provide the perspective from our own field, to be used in reaching agency decisions.

EPP 2010 November 30, 2004