1 / 37

AEROSPACE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 9100

AEROSPACE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 9100. Dale K. Gordon Past Chairman Americas Aerospace Quality Group SAE Aerospace Committee G-14 March 14th 2002. Aerospace Quality Standards Numbering System. International Standards - 91xx

benjamin
Download Presentation

AEROSPACE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 9100

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AEROSPACEQUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 9100 Dale K. Gordon Past ChairmanAmericas Aerospace Quality Group SAE Aerospace Committee G-14 March 14th 2002

  2. Aerospace Quality StandardsNumbering System • International Standards - 91xx • Are planned for harmonization across all 3 aerospace sectors and are recognized globally • Americas Standards - 90xx • Are published for use by AAQG, may become an 91XX standard at a later date • “AS” Standards - Americas • Published by Society of Automotive Engineers • “EN” Standards - Europe • published in Europe by AECMA • “JIS Q”or “SJAC” is the Japan / Asia Equivalent Dale K. Gordon

  3. Aerospace Quality System Standards • INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS • 9100 - Quality System for Aerospace Manufacturers • 9101 - Checksheet for 9100 • 9110 - Quality System for Aerospace Repair Stations • 9111 - Checksheet for 9110 - EAQG only • 9120 - Quality System for “Pass-Through” Distributors • 9121 - Checksheet for 9120 Dale K. Gordon

  4. International First Article Inspection (9102) Management of Key Characteristics (9103) Record Retention (9130) Nonconformance Documentation (9131) 2D Bar Coding (9132) Part Qualification Process 9133) Americas AS9003 - “Less than” 9100 Production Process Planning Verification (software) Software Quality (Embedded / Product Acceptance) Internal Auditing Requirements Sub-tier Supplier Control Direct Shipments (ARP 9004) Electronic Signatures Aerospace Quality Standards (cont.) Dale K. Gordon

  5. HISTORY OF 9100

  6. Background - Early to mid-1990s • DoD canceled quality system specifications • FAA lacks a definitive description of a quality system • Primes began to flow ISO 9000 series plus unique requirements to suppliers • Suppliers asked industry to standardize • Needed to operate a single quality system • Already adopting ISO 9000 series Dale K. Gordon

  7. U.S. Industry Response - 1995 Supplier Management and Quality Assurance professionals from: AlliedSignal Pratt & Whitney Boeing Rockwell Collins GE Engines Rolls-Royce Allison Lockheed Martin Sundstrand McDonnell Douglas Northrop Grumman Sponsors • Aviation/Space & Defense Division of American Society for Quality • SAE Aerospace Council Dale K. Gordon

  8. Writing Team Formed Company Specific Req’mts D1-9000 Inputs ISO-9001 MIL-I NASA FAA MIL-Q DoD AS9000:1997 Dale K. Gordon

  9. Global Quality Standard Activity Dale K. Gordon

  10. ISO TC20 - WG11 ISO Technical Committee 20 - Aircraft & Space Vehicles • Established Working Group 11 (April 1997) • Chartered to develop and publish an international quality system standard based upon ISO 9001 for the aerospace industry • United States (Gene Barker) Convener • Members: Brazil ChinaFrance GermanyJapan Mexico United Kingdom United States Dale K. Gordon

  11. International Quality SystemStandard Creation 1998 Americas Standard European Standard ISO 9001 1994 AS9000 prEN 9000-1 World Aerospace Quality Standard ; AS/EN/JIS Q 9100 ISO TC 20 WG11 AS9100 EN 9100 Dale K. Gordon

  12. TC20 / WG 11 to IAQG • Upon completion/approval of the new standard, WG 11 transfers responsibility for technical content to newly formed International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG). • WG11 is disestablished (June 1999). • IAQG takes responsibility for 91XX documents and publishes 9100 in each of the 3 Sectors (1999) • AMERICAS - SAE AS9100 • EUROPE - AECMA-STAN EN9100 • ASIA - JIS Q9100 (Japan) Dale K. Gordon

  13. Why 9100? • To standardize Aerospace quality expectations on a global level • To achieve improvements in quality and reduce costs throughout the value stream • ISO 9000 model for quality does not capture regulatory requirements or importance of safety, reliability or maintainability • Captures aerospace supplements agreed to at an international level Dale K. Gordon

  14. Aerospace Quality System 9100Standard versus ISO 9001 • 9100:1999 added 83 additional and specific requirements to the 20 elements of ISO 9001 • 11 amplifications of ISO 9001 paragraphs are also inserted • Emphasis is placed on Design Control, Process Control, Purchasing, Inspection & Testing and Control of Nonconformances • All areas that have the greatest impact on safety and reliability for aerospace products Dale K. Gordon

  15. Year 2000 ISO 9000 Revisions A moving target . . . Dale K. Gordon

  16. 9100 Standard Alignment with ISO 9001:2000 • IAQG had the responsibility • Aligned aerospace requirements with the new ISO 9001:2000 • Incorporated lessons learned - clarified requirements • Coordination and resolution was by geographic sectors Americas (AAQG) Europe (EAQG) Asia (SJAC) • Goal to publish revision to 9100 - est. June 2001 • AS9100A published by SAE in August 2001 • JIS Q 9100:2001 published by JSA in November 2001 Dale K. Gordon

  17. 9100:2001 Highlights (cont.) • Intent of aerospace-unique requirements are not changed in new version of 9100 • ISO 9001:2000 revision now has requirementsdesired by industry, eliminating somerequirements from 9100:1999 version • Some requirements from ISO 9001:1994 are desired by industry and were added back to 9100:2001 version • 9100:2001 contains 80 aerospace unique requirements and 18 amplifications/notes Dale K. Gordon

  18. ISO 9001:2000 / 9100:2001Timeline 2000 2003 2001 2002 DEC. 2003 ISO 9001:1994 ISO 9001:2000 9100 : 1999 9100 : 2001 9100:2003 ? 9100A:2001 will include both ISO 9001:1994 and ISO 9001:2000 models until December 2003 Dale K. Gordon

  19. FAA Endorsement of AS9100:1999 “The Aircraft Certification Service believes that the effective implementation of AS9100 will enhance an organization’s overall performance, as long as the statement...Other Quality System requirements imposed by the applicable Regulatory Authorities shall be included or referenced in the Quality System documentation is strictly adhered to. Though the FAA does not require the use of the additional elements found in AS9100, it recognizes their benefits to the aviation in increasing an organizations’ efficiency and reducing product and system variance.” Dale K. Gordon

  20. Current USA DoD Position • Proposed Department of Defense (DoD) Adoption of the AS9100: 2001 Quality Management Systems - Aerospace -Requirements (Nov. 2001) • prepared ... DoD adoption notice for the AS 9100:2001 to provide information for document visibility and facilitate document availability to DoD personnel. • International Aerospace Quality Standard AS 9100, 2001 edition, Quality Management Systems--Aerospace Requirements, was adopted on March 1, 2002 for use by the Department of Defense (DoD). The standard specifies additional requirements identified by the aerospace industry specifically for an aerospace quality management system based on ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems Requirements. Dale K. Gordon

  21. Current NASA Position on AS9100 • “AS 9100 is identified in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as a higher-level quality standard, has been recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration, is being adopted by the Air Force, and is currently used by a number of NASA programs.” • Office of Procurement are presently reviewing ...intent for NASA to adopt this standard. After (a) thirty-day comment period, ... the Office of Procurement (may) implement this change in acquisition policy. Dale K. Gordon

  22. SPACE CONSIDERATIONS • ISO TC20 / SC14 and IAQG haveon-going project to supplement9100 w/ special considerations forSpace needs • Includes Risk Management & Safety and Mission Assurance emphasis • Use as supplement to 9100 • Consideration for full inclusion at next revision of 9100 • Other Space considerations with IAQG process / documents to be considered as appropriate Dale K. Gordon

  23. 9100 Checklist - 9101 • IAQG developed 9101 Common Checklist to be used by industry to cover all ISO 9001 & 9100 elements - allows industry to share audit information • Must be used by Certification Bodies when performing 9100 audits • Optional scoring feature iscurrently used by AECMA-EASE Dale K. Gordon

  24. 9110 Repair Station Quality System • EN 9110 developed and implemented in Europe for facilities that perform maintenance and repairs of aircraft and aircraft products • Based on 9100 requirements and FAA / JAA - JAR 145 requirements • Corresponding 9111 checklist has also been developed and published • International harmonized version for is being worked Dale K. Gordon

  25. 9120 Distributor Quality System • EN 9120 developed and implemented in Europe for “pass through” stockists / distributors that handle parts and supplies that are used in aerospace products • Checklist 9121 is also availablein Europe • Based on 9100, but only appliesnecessary system requirements. • Americas already has several distributor standards (ASA 100, AS7103) • International harmonized standard is being worked Dale K. Gordon

  26. Industry Leaders are Listening • Agreed to improve the overall approach to quality • Major Aerospace Companies have agreed upon Quality Management System approval approaches • A key objective is to reduce the number of audits • There are significant benefits to the Aerospace Industry • Working to develop our International processes to incorporate the new approach • International approach is based on a single agreed standard, harmonization of system application and shared information

  27. Industry Acceptance / Usage • The IAQG implementation metrics show that; • 50+% of members have implemented 9100 internally and to their suppliers • 20+% of members have implemented 9102, FAI, internally and to their suppliers. • 8% of companies have implemented the recently published 9103, Component Proving, internally and to their suppliers. • Implementation is gaining momentum and this will increase, particularly when the new Boeing Quality System is reissued. • The sector implementation approaches are also making good progress but the benefits from global mutual recognition of Quality System audits is still not quite there yet - we need the global database. Dale K. Gordon

  28. International Aerospace Sector Certification Scheme Each geographic region or area needs to establish a system, based on a set of agreed criteria, which defines how 9100 will be implemented We will then have agreed and compatible systems acceptable to all, which allows us to share audit results and approvals resulting in multiple assessment reduction and process improvement Dale K. Gordon

  29. What is the Goal of the System? The goal of the system is for a supplier to receive one 9100 quality systems approval that will be acceptable to all aerospace OEMs throughout the world. The key element in this is confidence. The aerospace OEMs must have confidence in the approvals being given in other Sectors. Dale K. Gordon

  30. International Requirements for Certification Single global standards 9100 Oversight/control by IAQG and Sectors Harmonised systems of application Inter-National Aviation Authority endorsement Inter-National Accreditation control International Aerospace Supplier Quality System Evaluation/Certification One audit accepted by all Primes Approved Cert. Bodies& Registrars Active Industry participation Approved Aerospace Auditors Data easily available to all participants Global acceptance by supplier base Dale K. Gordon

  31. Basic structure of the system International Aerospace 3rd Party Accreditation IAQG Scheme issued by SAE / AECMA / SJAC WHAT requirements IAQG “oversight” Americas Asia Europe (equivalent) (equivalent) HOW Americas Scheme Asia Scheme Europe Scheme oversight oversight oversight Accreditation Body Registrars Auditors Assessment Suppliers data Data Base Accreditation Body Registrars Auditors Assessment Suppliers data Data Base Accreditation Bodies Registrars Auditors Assessment Suppliers data Data Base Access Usage Aerospace Industry Participants

  32. Aerospace Supplier Quality System Certification by the IAQG Sectors • Based on Deployment of Sector Processes • AIR5359 / 5493 (Americas) • AECMA (Europe) • SBAC TS157 (UK) • SJAC 9010 / 9011 (Asia) • IAQG Document 104 Released Jun ‘01 • Industry Database Under Construction Dale K. Gordon

  33. IAQG Procedure 104Important Considerations • Includes requirements for AB’s and CB’s • Includes requirements for auditors • Training requirements are stated • Includes requirements for reporting results of audits • Includes minimum audit times and guidelines • Industry involvement • Must require suppliers to notify OEM’s of status of Registration and any changes thereto • Must report problems with Registrars • Should track suppliers vs. Registrars vs performance Dale K. Gordon

  34. IAQG 104 - Oversight • Establishes industry Oversight Function (IAQG OT) • The following is not part of IAQG 104: • IAQG OT will: 1.) Monitor each Sector’s administration of their plan 2.) Review IAF peer evaluation of ABs 3.) Monitor feedback from IAQG members, CRBs, suppliers using the system 4.) Periodic review of Lessons Learned & any changes to Sector schemes 5.) Ensure data base effectiveness 6.) Provide summary report to IAQG at Council meetings Dale K. Gordon

  35. 9100 Registration Attributes • Salient Points about Registration • OEM’s are not absolving themselves of any responsibilities with respect to the supply chain / products • Registration increases the level of surveillance by covering suppliers that the OEM’s do not cover directly. • Provides for consistent application of requirements throughout the supply chain (9100). • Provides for active industry participation and control. • Provides for data sharing amongst primes and benchmarks the industry in terms of Quality System compliance. • Supplements OEM’s own surveillance process and allows for more focused process and products audits. Dale K. Gordon

  36. Summary • Industry Co-operation on Quality System Requirements • A single global 9100 Aerospace standard • An agreed International process for procedure creation • Sector processes for 2nd or 3rd party approvals • Individual sector plans launched / global plans in work • Implementation planned progressively during 2001 • Establish a mechanism for data exchange • International auditor training and qualifications • Communication to Authorities and Stakeholders • Industry will Monitor results and maintain momentum Dale K. Gordon

  37. QUESTIONS Dale K. Gordon

More Related