1 / 7

General Rapporteur’s Feedback

General Rapporteur’s Feedback. Lawrence Pratchett Council of Europe Symposium on e-Democracy: New opportunities for enhancing civic participation Strasbourg: 23-24 April 2007. Overall . Broad themes The added value Overarching conclusions . Broad themes 1. Why do we need e-democracy?

bandele
Download Presentation

General Rapporteur’s Feedback

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. General Rapporteur’s Feedback Lawrence Pratchett Council of Europe Symposium on e-Democracy: New opportunities for enhancing civic participation Strasbourg: 23-24 April 2007

  2. Overall • Broad themes • The added value • Overarching conclusions .

  3. Broad themes 1 • Why do we need e-democracy? • Political disengagement • The ICT opportunity • Issues of supply and demand • If we build it they will come • The unable willing or the able unwilling • The scope of e-democracy • From e-Parliaments to Web 2.0

  4. Broad themes 2 • Revolution or evolution? • Change is happening but traditions also endure • Top down and bottom-up democracy • What governments do matters • Understanding democratic processes • The relationship between online and offline democratic processes

  5. The added value! • What type of democracy do we want? • What values do we want e-democracy to emphasise? • How do individual devices affect behaviour (citizens, politicians, other stakeholders)? • How can individual devices link to policy decisions and outcomes? • What criteria should we use for evaluating democracy and how can evaluations help democratic development? • What rules should we be developing (Rules in form or Rules in use)?

  6. Overarching conclusions • Enacted democracy – a limited number of devices but a great variation in their use and impact • We are not involved in an end game – democracy will need to be constantly renewed

  7. Thank you lap@dmu.ac.uk www.dmu.ac.uk/lgru

More Related