1 / 16

E-justice Portal and a European Database of Legal Interpreters and Translators

Learn about the European e-Justice Portal and the Training for the Future conference in Madrid. Explore the interconnection projects, challenges, and recommendations for improving access to justice through ICT and simplifying procedures. Discover the centralized vs decentralized approach and the available features in the portal. Contact the European Commission for more information.

bakerr
Download Presentation

E-justice Portal and a European Database of Legal Interpreters and Translators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. E-justice Portal and a European Database of Legal Interpreters and Translators TRAFUT – Training for the Future Madrid, 15 & 16 March 2012 Philippe Vlérick European Commission, DG Justice

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Interconnection Projects • Insolvency Registers • Challenges & Recommendations

  3. Introduction • European e-Justice • European e-Justice Portal • Centralised VS Decentralised

  4. European e-Justice • Use of ICT at the service of judicial systems • Simplify procedures • Improve access to justice • Reduce costs

  5. European e-Justice Portal

  6. General Philosophy • Single point of e-Services • Step by step approach • Multilingual from day one • Decentralised as much as possible • Ambitious!

  7. In Short…

  8. Centralised VS Decentralised From e-Justice Portal point of view: • Centralised: only one system, content ownership to the Commission • Decentralised: only one system, content ownership to MS or third parties • From a technical point of view: • Centralised: only one system • Decentralised: multiple systems connected

  9. Centralised (technical)

  10. Decentralised (technical)

  11. Interconnection Projects • Insolvency Registers (IRI) • Find a Lawyer (FAL) • Find a Notary (FAN) • European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) • Business Registers (by DG-MARKT)

  12. Insolvency Registers • Simple Search: on “Name” propagated to all interconnected registers

  13. Insolvency Registers (2) • Advanced Search: different search page for each MS (dynamic)

  14. Challenges & Recommendations • Harmonised Data Set • Should be feasible for Interpreters and Translators • Data Protection • Interoperability • Available Features at Register Level • Translation (to be kept in mind)

  15. Available Features at Register Level • Transliteration? • Transcription? • Phonetic Search?

  16. Thank you for your attentionAny questions? • https://e-justice.europa.eu • philippe.vlerick@ec.europa.eu • JUST-E-JUSTICE@ec.europa.eu

More Related