1 / 9

WP3: Policy recommendations and report on feedback from SMEs and Investors

WP3: Policy recommendations and report on feedback from SMEs and Investors Presenter : William Stevens Organisation : Europe Unlimited YMIR Project Review Meeting Brussels, 13 March 2011. 4.2.4 T3.7 Policy Recommendations Workshop Objectives:

badu
Download Presentation

WP3: Policy recommendations and report on feedback from SMEs and Investors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP3: Policy recommendations and report on feedback from SMEs and Investors Presenter: William Stevens Organisation: Europe Unlimited YMIR Project Review Meeting Brussels, 13 March 2011

  2. 4.2.4 T3.7 Policy Recommendations Workshop Objectives: • Main findings of moving ICT Research & Innovation Projects to Venture Investment • Recommendations for methodologies improving • Investment readiness • Matching with investors

  3. 4.2.4 T3.7 Policy Recommendations Workshop Participants (ongoing): • EC : David Harmon, Steve Rogers, Pierre Marro, ... • National: office PT State Secr. Innovation, ViolettaGerasymenko (NOVA), InnovCapital, ... • 5 SMEs that took part (ongoing) • 5 investors that took part (ongoing)

  4. 4.2.4 T3.7 Policy Recommendations Workshop Agenda Workshop Lisbon 26 March 2pm: 14.00 - Welcome to to the workshop by the moderator 14.10 - Round Table introductions14.30 - Presentation of the Findings & Recommendations of the YMIR project in the ICT Finance Marketplace14.50 - Feedback and suggestions15.30 - Wrap up and conclusions15.45 - End of the meeting

  5. Main Findings - Demand of SMEs/Start-ups • High demand of SMEs/Start-ups for Matching (Forum) • Demand is across Europe for (cross-border) funding • Higher demand of earlier stages/start-ups vs. later stages • Lower demand of SMEs taking part in Framework Programmes • Promising SMEs (highest rated) ready to join multiple events • Demand to review Business & Investment Potential • Demand for Investment Readiness (Academy) • Demand mainly to prepare for Matching • Great to improve Presentations & Propositions/Expectations • Can avoid continued Matching of poor quality companies

  6. Main Findings – InvestmentSupply Trends • Supply of independent VC goes down (see fact# ..) • both national and cross-border • Role of government funding/VC increases • even for the funding (of independent) VC • Increasing importance of corporate venturing • is much more cross-border and interested in earlier stages • Role of angels increases • but fragmented and regional/national • Role of advisory increases (& matching)

  7. Main Findings – Investors • Matching • Confirmed interest, especially for quality & investment ready • Agnostic to source of SMEs (FP or not) • Interest to follow most promising SMEs (Award winners) • Willing to rate/review Business&Investment Potential • Demand for Investment Readiness • Investors push for better investment readiness & selections • Investors are willing to help as coaches on a goodwill basis • Government investors accompany portfolio companies seeking Matching through to follow-on funding

  8. Recommendations – Matching • SMEs/Start-ups • Continue to offer frequent Matching Events • Link these events in a Contest programme • Accompany for 6 -12 months to eventual funding • Envisage prizes/grants for the most promising? • Investors • Involve all investors in an ongoing format across the events and contest programme • Work together with government/regional investors • Promote more corporate venturing • Envisage (cross-border) co-financing facility?

  9. Recommendations – InvestmentReadiness • Broader & deeper selection & feedback • More review & feedback online and onsite by broader group of investors leads to stronger investment readiness & matching • Accompany through to funding • Accompany with selected pooled quality/sector peer groups to eventual funding with“interested” coaches (angels, non-execs) • Make eco-system more transparent • Transform “events “ into a “community” • News, case studies and guidance animated online as an open platform

More Related