1 / 106

The Insurance Cycle is Alive and Well and Ready to Kill Your Company: Are Actuaries to Blame?

The Insurance Cycle is Alive and Well and Ready to Kill Your Company: Are Actuaries to Blame?. Casualty Actuarial Society Ratemaking Seminar New Orleans, LA March 10, 2005. Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, Senior Vice President & Chief Economist

babette
Download Presentation

The Insurance Cycle is Alive and Well and Ready to Kill Your Company: Are Actuaries to Blame?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Insurance Cycle is Alive and Well and Ready to Kill Your Company:Are Actuaries to Blame? Casualty Actuarial Society Ratemaking Seminar New Orleans, LA March 10, 2005 Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, Senior Vice President & Chief Economist Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 Tel: (212) 346-5520 Fax: (212) 732-1916 bobh@iii.org  www.iii.org

  2. Presentation Outline • P/C Financial Overview & Outlook: The Cycle Returns • Premiums • Underwriting Performance • Pricing, Profits • Capital/Capacity • Investments • Financial Strength/Ratings • Will it Be Different This Time Around? • Actuaries: Are They to Blame? • 3 Case Studies: PPA, Homeowners & WC • Investment Income Influence Considerations • Exogenous Influences • Possible Solutions • Summary • Q & A

  3. P/C FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

  4. Highlights: Property/Casualty,9-Months 2004 vs. 9-Months 2003 Growth rate less than half that of a year earlier An underwriting profit? What’s that? Record Surplus! *2003 surplus figure is as of 12/31/03 **The combined ratio for full-year 2003 was 100.1 Combined < 100

  5. CYCLICAL EVIDENCE:PREMIUMS

  6. Strength of Recent Hard Markets by NWP Growth* 1975-78 1984-87 2001-04 Real NWP Growth During Past 3 Hard Markets 1975-78: 8.6% 1984-87: 11.2% 2001-04E: 6.8% Premium growth is faltering. Real growth in 2005 will approach ZERO. Note: Shaded areas denote hard market periods. Source: A.M. Best, Insurance Information Institute *2004 based on 1st half results from ISO. 2005 figure is III forecast.

  7. CYCLICAL EVIDENCE:UNDERWRITING PERFORMANCE

  8. P/C Industry Combined Ratio 2001 = 115.7 2002 = 107.2 2003 = 100.1 2004: 9 mos. = 97.9 2005F = 99 Combined Ratios 1970s: 100.3 1980s: 109.2 1990s: 107.8 2000-04E: 106.5 The industry has just experienced its most remarkable recovery in recent history *9-month result. Sources: A.M. Best; ISO, III

  9. Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975-2004F 2004 is likely to produce the first underwriting profit since 1978 $ Billions *Based on 9-month result. Source: A.M. Best, Insurance Information Institute

  10. Commercial vs. Personal Lines Combined Ratios Compression of results is due to low interest. Underwriting is now more important in long-tail commercial lines 10-Year Average Combined Ratios* Commercial: 109.9 Personal: 104.4 Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute *1994-2003 average

  11. Combined Ratios:2004 vs. 2005E Combined ratios are expected to change very little in 2005, masking a deterioration of about 2 to 3 points associated with 2004’s catastrophe impacted results Commercial auto, CMP, Inland Marine results remain reasonable, but WC, GL still problematic Source: A.M. Best Review/Preview, January 2005; Insurance Information Institute.

  12. Combined Ratio: Reinsurance vs. P/C Industry • 2001’s combined ratio was the worst-ever for reinsurers; 2002 was bad as well. • 2003: Big improvement in primary and reinsurer segments *Through 2004:Q3 Source: A.M. Best, ISO, Reinsurance Association of America, Insurance Information Institute

  13. Underwriting Expense Ratio* Insurers are keeping expenses under control *Ratio of expenses incurred to net premiums written. Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute

  14. CYCLICAL EVIDENCE:PROFITABILITY

  15. P/C Net Income After Taxes1991-2004E* ($ Millions) • 2001 ROE = -2.6% • 2002 ROE = 1.0% • 2003 ROE = 9.4% • 2004 ROE = 11.5%F *9-Month results; F = Full Year forecast/estimate. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.

  16. ROE: P/C vs. All Industries 1987–2004E Source: Insurance Information Institute; Fortune

  17. ROE vs. Equity Cost of Capital: US P/C Insurance:1991 – 2004F The p/c insurance industry likely achieved its costs of capital in 2004 for the first time in many years +1.6 pts -1.2 pts -10.2 pts -14.6 pts US P/C insurers missed their cost of capital by an average 6.5 points from 1991 to 2003 Source: The Geneva Association, Ins. Information Inst.

  18. THE CYCLE LIVES:IT REALLY WILL BE DIFFERENT THIS TIME Won't It?

  19. YES!

  20. YES!It Be Different This Time Around! • New Management: Benefit of 20/20 Hindsight • Most (re)insurer CEOs have been replaced over past 5 years • New management teams not eager to repeat past mistakes • Management Mantra: Preaching Disciplined UW & Pricing • Information Flow: • Many insurers have now implemented MIS systems that reduce recognition lags & reaction times and increase info flow • Compensation Structure: Not Just Volume Based • Stock incentives playing a lesser role • Strict adherence to UW manual and pricing • Sarbanes-Oxley • CEO/CFO’s personal assets on the line • Board of Directors quality enhanced; less chummy • Reserves become more adequate • Actuaries, UWs, accountants all on board & getting tough

  21. YES!It Be Different This Time Around! • Ratings Agencies • Have become de facto regulators • Keeping a tight leash on upgrades and paying a lot of attention to capital/reserve adequacy & profitability-industry disciplined • Investment Analysts • Subject insurers to greater scrutiny • Regulators • Finally waking up • Quasi-Regulators • Spitzer, other AGs, SEC will keep industry on its toes • Tort reform is finallyhappening • Republican Domination of Congress/White House Good for Industry • We’re Better at Anticipating New/Emerging Risks • Better at Managing Existing Risks/Reducing Volatility

  22. NO!

  23. NO!It Won’t Be DifferentThis Time Around! • Management Never Learns: Hindsight Means Nothing • 80 years of history show management repeats same mistakes • Quarterly earnings and growth targets are still king • Mantra of UW & Pricing discipline is just lip service • P/C Insurance Will Always Be an Impossible Business • Impossible to use past information to determine prices today for a product sold tomorrow for claims that may arise in the distant futureAND expect to be right • Investor Fatigue • Wall Street is fed up with low returns; no capital for you • Capital is now highly opportunistic; not committed to long run • Investments: Still Used to Paper Over Poor UW & Pricing Decisions • Cash flow underwriting is back in vogue (or soon will be)

  24. NO!It Won’t Be DifferentThis Time Around! • Regulators Still Asleep at the Switch • E.g., Piling on to Spitzer investigation • Vehement defense on status quo regulatory environment • Still do Bad Job Managing Variability/Volatility • 2004 hurricane season, D&O, Products Liability • Constantly blindsided • Tort Reform: Keep on Dreamin’ • Big loopholes in Class Action Fairness Act • Act was watered down (no atty. fee limits or damage caps) • Forum shopping at the federal level still possible • Republican Congress/White House Don’t Care About Us • Except CAFA, little success in Washington over past few years • Spitzer investigation = opportunity to heap scorn on industry

  25. What Wall Street Thinks • *The commercial insurance market is softening as prices decline, particularly in short tail lines, and competition increases. • Company X [name omitted] said that it would reduce pricing for its best customers in what we view as a potentially troubling trend because it’s a slippery slope. • Falling pricing, less restrictive terms and conditions, and a shift innegotiating leverage away from the insurers to the commercial insurance buyers should result in a challenging operating environment for the commercial insurers in 2005, as well as lower premium growth and deteriorating margins • Demand for reinsurance is flat, while supply has increased. Source: Prudential Securities’ P/C insurance analyst, Jay Gelb, March 9, 2005

  26. CAUSE FOR CONCERN? THE CYCLE IS A NATURAL BORN KILLER

  27. FINANCIAL STRENGTH, SOLVENCY & SECURITY

  28. Downgrade/Upgrade Ratio* Downgrade to upgrade ratio is falling (primarily because the number of downgrades is falling; only a small increase in upgrades) Sources: Impairment Rate and Rating Transition Study—1977 to 2002, A.M. Best & Co. *U.S. property/casualty and life/health insurers before 2000; P/C only 2000-2004.

  29. P/C Company Insolvency Rates,1993 to 2002 • Insurer insolvencies are increasing • 10-yr industry failure rate: 0.72% • Failure rating for B+ or better rating: 0.49% • Failure rate for D through B rating: 1.29% 10-yr Failure Rate = 0.72% 30 30 38 Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute

  30. Reason for P/C Insolvencies(218 Insolvencies, 1993-2002) Reserve deficiencies account for more than half of all p/c insurers insolvencies Source: A.M. Best, Insurance Information Institute

  31. RESERVING PROBLEMS:ARE ACTUARIES TO BLAME?

  32. P/C Insurance Industry Reserve Development from Prior Year* Adverse reserve development totaled $47.8 billion from 2000 through 2003 Adverse reserve development is the #1 killer of p/c insurance companies: Strength Matters *Negative numbers indicate favorable development; positive figures represent adverse development. Source: A.M. Best, Morgan Stanley, Dowling & Partners Securities, Prudential Securities, Ins. Info. Inst.

  33. CALENDAR Year Loss & ALAE Reserve Development Through 2003* Adverse reserve development is a perpetual problem NA *Negative numbers indicate favorable development; positive figures represent adverse development. Figures represent total development relative initial calendar year reserves Source: A.M. Best; Ins. Info. Inst.

  34. ACCIDENT Year Loss & ALAE Reserve Development Through 2003* AY1998-2001 claims source of great pain in the industry NA *Negative numbers indicate favorable development; positive figures represent adverse development. Figures represent total development relative initial accident year reserves Source: A.M. Best; Ins. Info. Inst.

  35. P/C Insurance Industry Prior Year Reserve Development by Line, 2002-03* Why did most lines develop so adversely in 2003? Major adverse development in casualty segments Who’s to blame? *Negative numbers indicate favorable development; positive figures represent adverse development. Source: A.M. Best, Ins. Info. Inst.

  36. Combined Ratio:Impact of Reserve Changes (Points) Prior-year adverse reserve development totaling nearly $14 billion in 2003 added 3.5 points to the p/c combined ratio in 2002 Source: ISO, A.M. Best, MorganStanley, Prudential Securities.

  37. PRICING PROBLEMS:ARE ACTUARIES TO BLAME?

  38. POLL: Who’s to Blame for Problem Pricing? (by Applause) • Actuaries • Senior Management of Company • Your Underwriting Department • Your Marketing Department • Regulators

  39. Cost of Risk vs. Commercial Lines Combined Ratio Source: RIMS, A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute

  40. World Rate-On-Line Index(1990 = 100) Reinsurance prices rising, limits falling: ROL up significantly, though not as much as after Hurricane Andrew in 1992 Source: Guy Carpenter

  41. P/C Soft Spots: % Accounts With Negative Price Change(4th Qtr. 2004) Casualty/Liability/Terrorism Property Significant moderation now evident in the commercial casualty lines Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute

  42. P/C Soft Spots: % Accounts With Negative Price Change(4th Qtr. 2003) Casualty/Liability/Terrorism Property Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute

  43. P/C Soft Spots: % Accounts With Negative Price Change(4th Qtr. 2002) Casualty/Liability/Terrorism Property Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute

  44. Commercial Premium Rate Changes Are Sharply Lower Is moderation due to realization of performance and profit goals, increasing capacity/ capital, or market- share strategies? Source: MarketScout.com

  45. A TALE OF THREE PRICING STRATEGIESPPA: Pricing Success StoryWC: Slow MoTrain Wreck?HO: Jury’s Out

  46. Private Passenger Auto

  47. *Insurance Information Institute Estimates/Forecasts Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute Average Expenditures on Auto Insurance Countrywide auto insurance expenditures are expected to rise 1.5% in 2005

  48. Private Passenger Auto Combined Ratio PPA is the profit juggernaut of the p/c insurance industry today Average Combined 1993 to 2004= 102.7 Many auto insurers have shown sig-nificant improvements in underwriting performance since mid-2002 Sources: A.M. Best; III

  49. Private Passenger Auto:Incurred Loss Ratios, 1999-2004:Q3 Loss ratios for all major coverage are trending downward Source: ISO Fast Track; Insurance Information Institute.

  50. Pure Premium Spread: Personal Auto PD Liability, 2000-2004:Q3 Margin necessary to maintain PPA profitability 2003 PPA Combined = 98 2000 PPA Combined = 110 Source: Insurance Information Institute calculations based ISO Fast Track and US BLS data.

More Related