1 / 17

Behavioral Retail Finance: Challenges in Moving from Research to Policy

Behavioral Retail Finance: Challenges in Moving from Research to Policy. Jonathan Zinman Dartmouth College October 28, 2009. From R to D. From research: On specific consumer cognitive biases, limitations On strategic firm responses To development, of “treatments”

axl
Download Presentation

Behavioral Retail Finance: Challenges in Moving from Research to Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Behavioral Retail Finance:Challenges in Moving from Research to Policy Jonathan Zinman Dartmouth College October 28, 2009

  2. From R to D • From research: • On specific consumer cognitive biases, limitations • On strategic firm responses • To development, of “treatments” • Communication (info, marketing, reminders) • Process (defaults, menus, auto/easy-features) • Product terms (commitment contracts) • “Retail financial engineering”; “product development” • Key insight: communication and process may be at least as important as the terms • We’re getting good at these pieces of R to D

  3. From R&D to Policy Increasingly popular premises: • We’re getting good at using “choice architecture” to change behavior • » We’re improving outcomes • Actually this remains uncertain • » We can scale up using policy • This is highly uncertain

  4. Are we improving outcomes? • Not necessarily • We are getting good at treating specific behaviors, but typically we don’t yet know what happens to: • other behaviors • overall financial health • Example…

  5. Are we improving outcomes?Example • Great success story: increasing workplace retirement saving • Via defaults, other process innovations • But what happens to rest of household balance sheet? • Do households reduce rainy-day savings? • Do they borrow more (at high rates)? • Do households actually increase wealth, financial resiliency? • Similar example: text-message reminders to save (Karlan, McConnell, Mullainathan, Zinman)

  6. Are we improving outcomes?General Issues • Is a nudge in the right direction on one side of the balance sheet a nudge in the wrong direction on the other? • Medical analogy: are we pushing the infection from the right arm to the left arm, and declaring victory because we only examine the right arm? • Can you treat consumer biases without a more holistic approach to treatment? • Financial health is the output of very many decisions large and small

  7. Are we improving outcomes?Priority To Do’s • Improve outcome measurements re: overall financial health • Savings rate • Borrowing (expensively), credit scores • *Proxies for overall financial condition • Figure outinteractions • Between biases • Between treatments

  8. Scaling Up To Policy:Additional Challenges Two additional challenges: • Treatment “compliance” • Limited enforcement on regulated firms • Treatment scope • Very difficult to regulate all relevant firms

  9. Treatment Compliance Challenges: Truth-in-Lending Example • Mandated APR disclosure does counter biased underestimation of borrowing costs when faced with “low monthly payments” (Stango & Zinman) • But: enforced better on banks than nonbank finance companies • So biased consumers pay higher rates when they end up borrowing from finance companies • And: (civil) enforcement is quite costly • Civil court case burden in 1970s • So biased consumers don’t actually pay lower rates when TILA better-enforced • I.e., their relative but not absolute outcomes improve

  10. Treatment Compliance Challenges: Defaults for Mortgage, Overdraft • Proposal: make vanilla product the default • 30 year, fixed rate • No overdrafts paid (and hence no fees) • How ensure that lenders offer a “good” vanilla product? • Invest more making expensive “vanilla” products seem deceptively cheap? • Will lenders specialize, and crowd-out the vanilla? • Are defaults sticky when suppliers have strong incentives to change them? • If “reasonableness” standard, how and how expensive to enforce through courts?

  11. Treatment Scope Challenge:Examples • Workplace defaults • Defaults, etc. offered through one broker of one type of savings product • But leave debt markets/decisions untouched

  12. Treatment Scope Challenge:Examples Small-dollar (e.g., payday) loans • Key practical question: can effectively regulate all potential providers (loan sharks, overdrafts, rent-to-own, etc.)? • If not may want to encourage entry • Even biased consumers may be better off borrowing at $15 per $100 if there is an unregulated alternative that’s more expensive

  13. So What Can Government Doin a Behavioral World? • The jury is still out. Be circumspect about: • Ability to treat overall financial health • Treatment scope/interaction issues • Ability to scale up • Treatment compliance and scope challenges • We’re making progress but.. the voice of Mr. Wolf • Best strategy (for now) may be to get out of way • Encourage entry, reduce any barriers to innovation • Example: workplace lending may be best solution to any problems caused by small-dollar loans • Potential for radical cost reductions and choice architecture improvements

  14. What Can Researchers andSocial Entrepreneurs Do? • We’ve been thinking small (nudge revolution) • Probably need to spend more time thinking big E.g., as discussed before: • How to measure overall financial health? • How do various cognitive limitations interact with each other? • How do various treatments designed to counteract limitations interact?

  15. More big issues • Complex pricing: more harm than good? • Given enforcement issues (compliance and scope) to efficient to throw haymaker than to nudge? • What can we learn from other domains where maintenance (daily decisions and big decisions) is important? • Health, cars, housing • (How) can we improve the advice market? • Closest to silver bullet, in theory?

  16. Answering these questions:Need commitment to R&D (No place for shortcuts: social costs of getting policy wrong are quite high) Instead: • Theorize • Develop treatment(s) • Field Test • Evaluate: with right outcome measures • Refine • Repeat

  17. Experiment Evaluate Innovate The Learning Organization:A Virtuous Cycle

More Related