Comparing Hybrid Peer-to-Peer Systems. based on an article by Hector Garcia-Molina Beverly Yang by Tudor Balan. P2P short survey. P2P advantages
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
based on an article by
Pure data sharing systems
Data sharing systems
Hybrid data sharing systems
Hybrid data sharing systems hugely popular but …
well studied also?
In case of music share g and f might be realistically taken as:
CPU cost variations for chained architecture (batched and incremental)
Client-Server byte costs
Interserver byte costs
expected nr of resultsMusic share systems behaviour
No previous treatment of memory implications
Batch strategies better than the incremental counterparts
NumServers , Memory (for FR)
Mem of incremental=1/ActiveFrac Mem of batch
ActiveFrac incr. strategies come closer to batch.
Memory price may eliminate worries about memory limitations
Ex1.QueryLoginRatio=.75(incr & batch CHN comparison) (69708,26828) vs (12268,28828)
Ex2. QueryLoginRatio=.25(incr & batch CHN comparison) (52088,9190) vs (12268,9190)