Loading in 2 Seconds...

CityDrive: A Map-Generating and Speed-Optimizing Driving System

Loading in 2 Seconds...

172 Views

Download Presentation
##### CityDrive: A Map-Generating and Speed-Optimizing Driving System

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

**CityDrive: A Map-Generating and Speed-Optimizing Driving**System Yiran Zhao, Yang Zhang, Tuo Yu, Tianyuan Liu, Xinbing Wang, XiaohuaTian Department of Electronic Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China XueLiu School of Computer Science, McGill University, Canada**Outline**• Introduction • Motivations • Objectives • Android smartphone capabilities • City map construction • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding Remarks**Motivation I/II**• Without traffic signal schedule information, vehicles’ accelerating and stopping cause increased fuel consumption, air pollution and accidents. Fuel burned Energy wasted**Motivation II/II**• Smartphones are ubiquitous, it’s easy to deploy intelligent transportation system on a smartphone in each vehicle.**Objective – I/II**In our work, we design an infrastructure-less speed advisory driving system that tries to make vehicles arrive at intersections in green phase. Our system only runs on Internet server and smartphones, using crowd-sourced smartphone sensor data to infer traffic signal schedule. Our system also provides foundations for many other applications: Commercial map revision and refinement Traffic signal planning advisory service Driving behavior and road condition estimation Red light violation advisory 5**Objective – II/II**We first construct city map using crowd-sourced smartphone data from GPS, accelerometer, and magnetometer. Then in each identified intersection, we design a method to merge traffic movements and infer traffic signal schedule from vehicles’ acceleration events. After the traffic signal schedule of a certain intersection is successfully deduced, our system provides speed advisory service for vehicles heading toward this intersection. 6**Outline**• Introduction • Android smartphone capabilities • Various sensing modules • Coordinate system transformation • City map construction • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding Remarks**Various sensing modules in smartphones**• 3-axis Accelerometer • Measures the acceleration applied to the device in device’s body coordinate system, including the force of gravity. • We need acceleration data to infer intersection location and traffic signal phase transition. • 3-axis Magnetometer • Measures the geomagnetic field in device’s body coordinate system. • We need magnetometer data when transforming acceleration vector into different coordinate systems. • Global Positioning System (GPS) • Devices’ position (longitude and latitude), speed (m/s), bearing (heading direction, in degrees), UTC time (in milliseconds since January 1, 1970), accuracy (in meters). • Average accuracy of position is about 4 -11 meters.**Coordinate system transformation**Coordinate systems: Measurements of accelerometer and magnetometer are in device’s body coordinate system. We have to transform acceleration vector from body coordinate system into local NED coordinate system using two reference vectors: gravity and geomagnetic field. North Earth device East Down (a) Body coordinate system (b) Local NED coordinate system 9**Coordinate system transformation**• Using Android library function to get rotation matrix: • Transform acceleration vector from body coordinate system () to Local NED coordinate system (): • Transformed acceleration data are easier to be processed and mapped to a geological map. 10**Outline**• Introduction • Android smartphone capabilities • City map construction • Locating candidate intersections • Clarifying intersection structure • Linking intersections • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding Remarks**Locating candidate intersections**• Assumption: during map-construction phase, vehicle acceleration after a sufficient long halt only happens at intersections when red light turns into green light. • Then it’s reasonable that locations with high acceleration vector density are likely to be intersections with traffic signals. • We use an approach similar to mean shift, in which successive computations of the mean shift yield a path leading to a local acceleration density maximum.**Locating candidate intersections**• Using mean shift to localize possible intersections: Possible locations of intersections.**Locating candidate intersections**• The result of mean shift may contain false positives, so we analyze the vector pattern in each intersection to confirm its validity. • We group acceleration vectors with approximately the same direction into one cluster, and each cluster should represent one branch of the intersection. • Then intersections with cluster (branch) number less than 3 or greater than 5, or with out-pointing mean vectors, are invalid. (a) Invalid intersection(b) Valid intersection**Clarifying intersection structure**• GPS traces between intersections are further analyzed to clarify branches. Traces starting and ending with the same pair of intersections are grouped into one road segment. Road segments (with direction) connected to each intersection are indexed. • GPS traces within each intersection are then analyzed to clarify the structure of that intersection, resulting in a connectivity table which supports one-way traffic situation. (a) Raw GPS traces within an intersection. (b) Clarified connectivity information of the intersection.**Linking intersections**• We want to use several directed points (Anchor Points) to represent the road segment between two neighboring intersections. • We use an algorithm similar to weighted mean shift that finds the centroid point and mean direction of a cluster of GPS points sharing approximately the same direction. Such points are anchor points. Intersections (blue circles) Anchor points (red circles), stored in database**Linking intersections**• How to generate road segment from a set of anchor points? – Second order B-spline curves to fit those points. • E.g. For every two successive anchor points (A and B in (a)), the control points of the B-spline curve are D, C and E, such that , =. Note in some cases especially when A and B are on a straight line, the B-spline curve on longer applies, so we use a straight line between A and B instead (like (b)).**Linking intersections**• The constructed map of our test bed is shown below, with comparison to real map from Google Map. The blue segments are B-spline curves and the magenta segments are straight lines.**Outline**• Introduction • Android smartphone capabilities • City map construction • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Vehicle acceleration data structure • Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference • Traffic signal timing calibration and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding Remarks**Vehicle acceleration data structure**• Future vehicle acceleration at a specific intersection will generate a data package sent to the server to help infer traffic signal schedule. A vehicle stops and waits for green light. Waiting at time T0. On detection of acceleration, smartphone records time T1. On detection of entering another branch, smartphone records time T2. Smartphone sends {wait time:(T1-T0); acc. time: (T2-T1); branch: I1,O3; ID} to the server.**Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference**• Denote () as the traffic movement from branch to branch. • At the beginning of traffic signal schedule inference, each () is called a state, . • Some states start at approximately the same time, so we merge them into one state. We simplify the subscript and denote the states as , , N is the total number of states. • As the number of states (N) decreases due to merging, we try to find the traffic signal cycle length (denoted as Tc). (Assume that each state only happens once in each cycle.) • Denote as the minimum time gap between consecutive acceleration events of state . • So, does min{, } necessarily equal to Tc? • -- We calculate the probability.**Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference**• Let be the probability that does NOT equal to Tc after n cycles. And the probability of an event of in one traffic signal cycle is . • Then probability is equal to probability if the (n+2)thcycle has no event plus probability if (n+2)thcycle has an event and (n+1)thcycle has no event: • Solving this equation yields: • The is estimated to be the ratio of the two-minute intervals that have an event to all such intervals.**Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference**• Let denotes the probability that equals to Tc. • The relationship between ,, and n is shown. We want >0.8, so that the probability that • min{, } equals to Tc is 1-(1-0.8)^N=0.9984 if N=4. • So we can almost • make sure that Tc • is correctly obtained • after 2n minutes of • data collecting, n is • solved by =0.8.**Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference**• Once the traffic signal cycle length Tcis obtained, the sequence of states {} are to be determined. • Ideally, and typically, there are four states after complete merging: • And the above four states should happen in sequence: • … • We give a new name to states that are in sequence and in closed loop: phase.**Traffic signal phase and phase sequence inference**• How to find such phases? – Linking states and see if their time interval adds up to Tc. • For each state , we find the nearest following state , which means in the entire set of recorded events at server side, there is an event of that most closely follows an event of . We make the two states into a link: , and the time interval is . • Moving on to finding the nearest following state after , and so on. If at some point, it loops back to , and sum{}, then we say that a loop chain is formed: . And each state is then called a phase. • Note that merging of states is still happening, we skip the details of this process.**Traffic signal timing calibration and update**• Given a loop chain, we calculate the timing schedule of each phase in this loop chain. • E.g. for a loop chain of N phases: , and . • Notation:**Traffic signal timing calibration and update**• The server collects smartphone reports and store the events in the table below: • is obtained from (), , and Tc. And we are going to calibrate , and get . • We resolve the above table into (N+1) columns, each forming a vector, namely: ,. The size of each vector is M.**Traffic signal timing calibration and update**• We formulate a target function that represents the mean square error (MSE) of predicted time: • Note that , , are known variables, and are to be calculated. • Minimize this target function by taking partial derivative of each variable in Equ.(1): • Solving the above equations yields calibrated and . And these values are used to predict future traffic signal schedule.**Outline**• Introduction • Android smartphone capabilities • City map construction • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding remarks**Route planning**• The system has to know whether to turn left or go straight at each intersection in order to get the corresponding traffic signal timing. So prior knowledge of route is required. • Dijkstra algorithm is employed on smartphones to calculate a route with the least travel time. • If the average speed of the planned road segment is available in real-time, then the travel time can be predicted more accurately. If not, system assume that the speed limit is 60 km/h. • On finishing one road segment, smartphone also reports the average speed of that road to the server, so the server can provide real-time routing service to other vehicles.**Best speed calculation**• Once the route is determined, the smartphone requests traffic signal schedule information of the next intersection. • Server returns: • Traffic signal cycle length: Tc; • The remaining time for the desired phase to turn green: ; • The remaining time to turn red: ; • Thus the time of reaching the intersection should be • and are time intervals used to reduce the impact of prediction error, and are empirically set to 10 seconds.**Best speed calculation**• To calculate the remaining distance to the next intersection, the smartphone integrates the B-spline curves or straight lines formulated in the City Map Construction section. • Once the distance (d) and travel time is obtained, the optimal speed should be such that: • n should be the least integer number that does not exceed speed limit. • d can be calculated multiple times on a road segment to provide constantly adjusting optimal speed to the driver.**Outline**• Introduction • Android smartphone capabilities • City map construction • Traffic signal schedule inference and update • Routing and speed advising • Concluding remarks**Conclusion**• In this paper, we have devised and implemented CityDrive, a software service that utilizes a collection of smartphone sensor and GPS data to continuously provide advisory speed for drivers. • Such speed-advisory service significantly reduces energy consumption and the number of complete halts. • But CityDrive requires a large proportion of running vehicles to use our system, and it may not work if the GPS signal is blocked by dense high buildings. Also, to avoid too much load on a single server, the central server system should be distributed to different regions. • Future work should figure out a way to identify flyovers, and to properly assign road lanes to vehicles moving with different speeds. In addition, incentives to use our service has to be explored, and proper punish mechanism is needed if drivers run the red light.**Reference (partial)**• [9] O. Servin, K. Boriboonsomsin, M. Barth, “An Energy and Emissions Impact Evaluation of Intelligent Speed Adaptation,” in Proc. IEEE ITSC’06, Toronto, Canada, September 17-20, 2006. • [10] K. Perera, D. Dias, “An Intelligent Driver Guidance Tool using Location Based Services,” in Proc. IEEE ICSDM’11, June 29-July 1, 2011. • [11] M. Krause, K. Bengler, “Traffic Light Assistant - Driven in a Simulator,” in Proc. IEEE IV’12, 2012. • [12] E. Koukoumidis, L.-S. Peh, and M. R. Martonosi, “SignalGuru: lever-aging mobile phones for collaborative traffic signal schedule advisory,” in Proc. MobiSys’11, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 127-140. • [13] G. Mahler, A. Vahidi, “Reducing idling at red lights based on probabilistic prediction of traffic signal timings,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2012 (pp. 6557-6562). • [14] M. Kerper, C. Wewetzer, A. Sasse, M. Mauve, “Learning Traffic Light Phase Schedules from Velocity Profiles in the Cloud,” in NTMS’12, pp. 1-5, 2012. • [15] P. Mohan, V. N. Padmanabhan, R. Ramjee, “Nericell: Rich Monitoring of Road and Traffic Conditions using Mobile Smartphones,” in Proc. ACM SenSys, pp. 323-336, 2008. • [16] S. Schroedl, K. Wagstaff, S. Rogers, P. Langley, C. Wilson, “Mining GPS traces for map refinement,” in Data mining and knowledge Discovery, 2004, 9(1): 59-87.