organization development n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Organization Development

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 71

Organization Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Organization Development. Professor Alexandre Ardichvili Module 3. Topics and Activities for Session 3. Definition of Organization Development (OD) OD and planned change models vs. other forms of organization change Roots of OD

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Organization Development' - avram-french

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
organization development

Organization Development

Professor AlexandreArdichvili

Module 3

topics and activities for session 3
Topics and Activities for Session 3
  • Definition of Organization Development (OD)
  • OD and planned change models vs. other forms of organization change
  • Roots of OD
  • Introduction to the planned change model (action research model)
  • Types of OD interventions
  • Case study
  • Video cases
burke s definition of od
Burke’s Definition of OD

OD is a planned process of change in an organization’s culture through the utilization of behavioral science technology, research, and theory.

Cummings & Worley 9e, (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

beckhard s definition of od
Beckhard’s Definition of OD

OD is an effort (1) planned, (2) organization-wide, and (3) managed from the top, to (4) increase organization effectiveness and health through (5) planned interventions in the organization’s “processes,” using behavioral science knowledge.

Cummings & Worley 9e, (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

  • What is OD? Provide your definition
  • Is OD practiced in Brazilian organizations? Can you share any examples?
organization development is defined as
Organization Development is defined as
  • the system-wide application and transfer of
  • behavioral science knowledge
  • to the planned development, improvement, and change
  • of strategies, structures, and processes
  • that lead to organizational effectiveness

(Cummings & Worley, 2009)








Work Design







Developing Talent

Managing Work-force Diversity & Wellness





& Group








Transformational Change

Continuous Change

Transorganization-al Change

Special Topics in Organization Development

Organization Development OD in Nonindustrial Future Directions

in Global Settings Settings in OD

Cummings & Worley 9e, (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

models of planned change
Models of Planned Change
  • Lewin’s Model (Unfreeze, Move, Refreeze)
  • Positive Model
  • Action Research Model
lewin s change model
Lewin’s Change Model




Cummings & Worley,9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

action research model
Action Research Model

Problem Identification

Joint diagnosis

Consultation with a

behavioral scientist

Joint action planning


Data gathering &

preliminary diagnosis

Data gathering after action

Feedback to Client

Cummings & Worley,9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning


Positive Model

Initiate the Inquiry

Inquire into Best Practices

Discover Themes

Envision a Preferred Future

Design and Deliver Ways to Create the Future

Cummings & Worley,9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning


General Model of Planned Change













Cummings & Worley,9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

mcgregor s theory x theory y
McGregor’s Theory X & Theory Y

Theory X:

Managers assume that people:

  • Have a genuine distaste for work; Therefore: Must be prodded, coerced or threatened into work
  • Prefer to be closely supervised; Avoid as much responsibility as they can
  • Have little ambition; Value security above all else

Theory Y:

Leaders assume that people:

  • Want to work
  • Will exercise self-control if they are committed to the results
  • Will be motivated to achieve goals if they value the outcomes to be achieved
  • Have imagination & creativity (these are not traits reserved for those in leadership positions)
  • Are capable of realizing more potential than are typically given
the organization development practitioner
The Organization Development Practitioner
  • Internal and External Consultants
  • Professionals from other disciplines who apply OD practices (e.g., TQM managers, IT/IS managers, compensation and benefits managers)
  • Managers and Administrators who apply OD from their line or staff positions

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western Cengage Learning

competencies of an od practitioner
Competencies of an OD Practitioner
  • Intrapersonal skills
    • Self-awareness
  • Interpersonal skills
    • Ability to work with others and groups
  • General consultation skills
    • Ability to manage consulting process
  • Organization development theory
    • Knowledge of change processes
  • Business knowledge
  • Research methods

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western Cengage Learning

flawless consulting peter block
Flawless Consulting (Peter Block)
  • Partnering with clients
  • Developing commitment for change
  • Acting authentically
  • Trusting yourself and your experience
action research model1
Action Research Model




Assessment and Feedback


Action Planning

and Change Management



  • Take 3 minutes to write down answers to these questions:
  • What are the important activities on the entry stage?
  • What are some important issues to be mindful of at this stage?
  • Share your thoughts with the large group.
the entry process
The Entry Process
  • Clarifying the Organizational Issue
    • Presenting Problem
    • Symptoms
  • Determining the Relevant Client
    • Working power and authority
    • Multiple clients
    • Specify the mission for the project

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

interpersonal issues of entry
Interpersonal Issues of Entry
  • Client Issues
    • Exposed and Vulnerable
    • Inadequate
    • Fear of losing control
  • OD Practitioner Issues
    • Empathy
    • Worthiness and Competency
    • Dependency
    • Over identification

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

types of clients
Types of Clients
  • Contact clients: approach the consultant initially
  • Intermediate clients: get involved in early meetings, provide some information
  • Primary clients: own a problem for which they need help
  • Ultimate clients: may or may not be directly involved with the consultant, but their welfare and interests must be considered in planning the interventions Shein (1988)
proposal questions to consider
Proposal: Questions to Consider
  • What is the organization after?
  • How deep does the problem go?
  • How many people & levels will be touched?
  • What kind of organizational culture exists?
  • Who are the decision makers?
  • Are there differences of opinion in the firm?
  • Has the firm used consultants in the past?
starting an action research project
Starting an Action Research Project
  • Begins when contract is signed
  • Building working relationships
  • Becoming oriented to client’s world
  • Complete preliminary diagnostic scan
  • Develop project plan
information gathering and analysis
Information Gathering and Analysis
  • Brainstorm a list of all things you need to know about the problem (Q: What information would you need to collect in the Falcon case?)
  • Prioritize the list (Use the Pareto rule: 80/20)
  • Think how you can collect data about the things you need to know (Falcon Case)
information gathering find the real problem and facts
Information gathering: find the real problem and facts
  • Literature search: published company and industry information; government sources
  • Document review:
    • Internally generated: mission statements and related materials, financial statements, org. charts, operating plans, operating manuals and procedures books, job task analysis reports, safety procedures handbooks
    • Externally generated: banks, auditors, government offices (OSHA, EPA, etc.), but circulated within the company
information gathering cont
Information gathering (cont.)
  • Interviews:
    • internal personnel directly and indirectly related to project,
    • internal personnel unrelated to project, but who may have insights into it,
    • external stakeholders: customers, suppliers, investors
  • Surveys: internal and/or external stakeholders; standardized or created by you
  • Direct observation
  • Other, non-related information

Qualitative and quantitative

Qualitative--content analysis :

- comparing individual answers to the same question

- thematic analysis: identify common themes

Quantitative: statistical analysis of survey results. Caution: are the “significant” topics really significant?

Use the Pareto principle in your analysis

Develop sketches, cause-effect diagrams, and flow charts to analyze the situation

Ask: why? why? why? why? why?

techniques for analyzing data
Techniques for Analyzing Data
  • Qualitative
    • Content Analysis
    • Force-Field Analysis
  • Quantitative
    • Descriptive statistics
    • Correlations
    • Differences between groups

Force-Field Analysis of Work Group Performance

Forces for Change

Forces for Status Quo

Group performance norms

New technology

Better raw materials

Fear of change

Current Performance


Competition from other groups

Member complacency

Well-learned skills

Supervisor pressures

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

organizational diagnosis
Organizational Diagnosis
  • Three levels:
    • organization-wide
    • group
    • individual job
  • Using systems thinking
    • Inputs
    • Design Components (Process/Transformation)
    • Outputs
organization level diagnosis
Organization Level Diagnosis
  • Inputs
    • External environment
    • Industry Structure
  • Design Component: Strategic Orientation
    • Strategy (Mission, Goals/Objectives, Intent/Policies)
    • Organization Design (Core Activities, Structure, Measurement, HR, Culture)
  • Outputs
    • Org. Performance
    • Productivity
    • Stakeholder Satisfaction


Diagnostic Model



Design Components


Strategy Structure

HR Measurement

Systems Systems








Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

key alignment questions
Key Alignment Questions
  • Do the Design Components fit with the Inputs?
  • Are the Design Components internally consistent? Do they fit and mutually support each other?

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

organization design components
Organization Design Components
  • Strategy
    • the way an organization uses its resources (human, economic, or technical) to gain and sustain a competitive advantage
  • Technology
    • the way an organization converts inputs into products and services
  • Structure
    • how attention and resources are focused on task accomplishment

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

organization design components1
Organization Design Components
  • Human Resource Systems
    • the mechanisms for selecting, developing, appraising, and rewarding organization members
  • Measurement Systems
    • methods of gathering, assessing, and disseminating information on the activities of groups and individuals in organizations

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

  • Organization Performance
    • e.g., profits, profitability, stock price
  • Productivity
    • e.g., cost/employee, cost/unit, error rates, quality
  • Stakeholder Satisfaction
    • market share, employee satisfaction, regulation compliance

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

  • Diagnosis involves understanding each of the parts in the model and then assessing how the elements of the strategic orientation align with each other and with the inputs.
  • Organization effectiveness is likely to be high when there is good alignment.

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning


Group-Level Diagnostic Model


Design Components


Goal Clarity

Task Group

Structure Functioning

Group Performance

Composition Norms





Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

group level diagnosis
Group-level Diagnosis
  • Inputs
    • Organization Design
  • Design Components
    • Goal Clarity, Task Structure, Group Composition, Group Norms, Team Functioning
  • Outputs
    • Team Effectiveness, as measured by: Quality decisions, productivity, team cohesiveness, etc.
group level design components
Group-Level Design Components
  • Goal Clarity
    • extent to which group understands its objectives
  • Task Structure
    • the way the group’s work is designed
  • Team Functioning
    • the quality of group dynamics among members
  • Group Composition
    • the characteristics of group members
  • Performance Norms
    • the unwritten rules that govern behavior

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

group level outputs
Group-Level Outputs
  • Product or Service Quality
  • Productivity
    • e.g., cost/member, number of decisions
  • Team Cohesiveness
    • e.g., commitment to group and organization
  • Work Satisfaction

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

job level diagnosis
Job-level Diagnosis
  • Inputs
    • Org. Design, Group Design, Personal Characteristics
  • Design Components
    • Skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback about results
  • Outputs
    • Individual effectiveness, as measured by: performance, absenteeism, job satisfaction, personal development, etc.

Individual-Level Diagnostic Model


Design Components


Skill Variety


Identity Autonomy

Task Feedback

Significance about Results





Group Design



Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

individual level design components
Individual-Level Design Components
  • Skill Variety
    • The range of activities and abilities required for task completion
  • Task Identity
    • The ability to see a “whole” piece of work
  • Task Significance
    • The impact of work on others
  • Autonomy
    • The amount of freedom and discretion
  • Feedback about Results
    • Knowledge of task performance outcomes

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

individual level outputs
Individual-Level Outputs
  • Performance
    • e.g., cost/unit, service/product quality
  • Absenteeism
  • Job Satisfaction
    • e.g., internal motivation
  • Personal Development
    • e.g., growth in skills, knowledge, and self

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

data feedback
Data Feedback
  • Purpose of Feedback
    • create energy
    • direct energy
    • turn energy into action

Possible Effects of Feedback

Feedback occurs

Is the energy created

by the feedback?




Energy to use

data to identify and

solve problems


What is the direction of the feedback?


to deny or

fight data

Do structures and

processes turn energy

into action?



no change




no change



Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

determining the content of feedback
Determining the Content of Feedback
  • Relevant
  • Understandable
  • Descriptive
  • Verifiable
  • Timely
  • Limited
  • Significant
  • Comparative
  • Unfinalized

Cummings & Worley, 9e (c) 2008 South-Western/Cengage Learning

kirkpatrick s levels of evaluation
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
  • Reactions. (At point 3 mostly). "Reaction may best be defined as how well the trainees liked a particular training program." (Kirkpatrick, 1959)
  • Learning. (At points 1,2,3) "What principles, facts, and techniques were understood and absorbed by the conferees?“ (Kirkpatrick,1960)
kirkpatrick s levels of evaluation1
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation

3. Behavior. Changes in on-the-job behavior. (No formal definition). (At point 4).

4. Results. "Reduction of costs; reduction of turnover and absenteeism; reduction of grievances; increase in quality and quantity or production; or improved morale which, it is hoped, will lead to some of the previously stated results." (Kirkpatrick, 1959). (At point 4).

questions to ask at each of the levels
Questions to Ask at Each of the Levels

Level 1 (Reaction): Were the participants pleased? What do they plan to do with what they learned?

Level 2 (Learning): What skills, knowledge, or attitudes have changed? By how much?

Level 3 (Behavior): Did the participants change their behavior based on what was learned in the program?

Level 4 (Results): Did the change in behavior positively affect the organization?

learning objectives
Learning Objectives
  • To understand the elements of a successful change program
  • To understand the role of an OD practitioner in a change program
  • To understand the process of institutionalizing OD interventions and the factors that contribute to it
od practitioner s role
OD Practitioner’s Role

Three minute paper

Write down:

  • What are some major change management activities?
  • What can an OD practitioner do to help an organization implement a change initiative?
change management activities
Change Management Activities

Motivating Change

Creating Vision





Political Support

Managing the Transition

Sustaining Momentum

motivating change
Motivating Change
  • Creating Readiness for Change
    • Sensitize the organization to pressures for change
    • Identify gaps between actual and desired states
    • Convey credible positive expectations for change
  • Overcoming Resistance to Change
    • Provide empathy and support
    • Communicate
    • Involve members in planning and decision making
creating a vision
Creating a Vision
  • Discover and Describe the Organization’s Core Ideology
    • What are the core values that inform members?
    • What is the organization’s core purpose or reason for being?
  • Construct the Envisioned Future
    • What are the bold and valued outcomes?
    • What is the desired future state?
developing political support
Developing Political Support
  • Assess Change Agent Power
  • Identify Key Stakeholders
  • Influence Stakeholders
managing the transition
Managing the Transition
  • Activity Planning
    • What’s the “roadmap” for change?
  • Commitment Planning
    • Who’s support is needed, where do they stand, and how to influence their behavior?
  • Change-Management Structures
    • What’s the appropriate arrangement of people and power to drive the change?
change as a transition state
Change as a Transition State








sustaining momentum
Sustaining Momentum
  • Provide Resources for Change
  • Build a Support System for Change Agents
  • Develop New Competencies and Skills
  • Reinforce New Behaviors
  • Stay the Course
institutionalization processes
Institutionalization Processes
  • Socialization
  • Commitment
  • Reward Allocation
  • Diffusion
  • Sensing and Calibration
indicators of institutionalization
Indicators of Institutionalization
  • Knowledge
  • Performance
  • Preferences
  • Normative Consensus
  • Value Consensus
od practitioner s role in change process
OD Practitioner’s Role in Change Process

What roles can OD practitioners play in change management?

od practitioner s roles
OD Practitioner’s Roles
  • Strategy and implementation: Help the organization to manage the change process (using Kotter’s steps or other models)
  • Human systems: Work with employees to change their attitude towards change, provide empathy, support
od practitioner s role1
OD Practitioner’s role

“What do I do? I turn people’s anxiety into fear”

Harry Woodward, Woodward Learning International

definition of anxiety wikipedia
Definition of Anxiety (Wikipedia)

“Anxiety is a generalized mood condition that can often occur without an identifiable triggering stimulus.

As such, it is distinguished from fear, which is an emotional response to a perceived threat.”

perceptions of change h woodward
Perceptions of Change (H. Woodward)

Common view:


More realistic View of Change:




LOSS – Something we used to do that we don’t do anymore.

GAIN – Something we’re doing that we haven’t done before.

context meeting
Context Meeting
  • Present the Model
  • List and Answer
    • What things are staying the same?
    • What things will we lose?
    • What things will we gain?

Additional Questions:

  • What do we need to invent?
  •  What are the “new rules?”

From now on we need to …

  • Given the change, we should consider …
  • We can no longer assume …