1 / 8

Discussion: Data Systems Looking Forward

Discussion: Data Systems Looking Forward. Jason Hyon, Frank Lindsay NASA Earth Science Data System Working Groups 8 th Joint Meeting October 20-22, 2009 Wilmington, Delaware. Observations. Accomplishments from each group should be quantitative Need to vet requirements at this meeting

avent
Download Presentation

Discussion: Data Systems Looking Forward

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion: Data Systems Looking Forward Jason Hyon, Frank Lindsay NASA Earth Science Data System Working Groups 8th Joint Meeting October 20-22, 2009 Wilmington, Delaware

  2. Observations • Accomplishments from each group should be quantitative • Need to vet requirements at this meeting • Bottom-up and top-down technology directions need balancing • What I would like to see in the next workshop • Reuse: cost saving successes • Technology: what new science or missions was enabled? • Matrices: New discovery, cost, risk, and time by users • Standards: what will take 3 instrument products to merge to produce level 4 data. • Working group meetings • Very productive, but lacks actions or follow-up • Directed req. is disappearing.. • No industry participation – they invent, we enhance! • Need to create a shared vision for innovation to occur

  3. Assessment and Moving Forward • What are the challenges and opportunities? • Were the information presented in a right manner to learn requirements from missions and others? • Were missions and science community exposed in a right manner to learn technology options? • What is a right venue to address application requirements? • What are some of the common approaches across the DS missions? • Can use cases be developed to inform future needs of the data systems? • Does the funding opportunities from NASA map to technology and infusion needs? • ESDS/ESTO – Service enabler and/or Service enhancer? • Do we need to change? As it is, Modify, or Overhaul • Do we have a right support organization to communicate with your needs? • Create a top-down shared vision for DSDS

  4. AIRBORNE & FLIGHT MISSIONS Science Working Group EOS Decadal Survey VENTURES R&A NOAA DS Mission MISSIONS ESDIS DS MISSION DAAC APPLICATION MISSIONS & PARTNERS MISSIONS & PARTNERS AIST & ACCESS MEASURES & APPL R&A, PARTNER R&A MEASURES HPC & MEASURES Data System Technology Opportunity Mapping GIS/APPLICATION PROCESSING DATA PRODUCTION DATA MANAGEMENT Mission Operation VISUALIZATION/REPRESENATION ANALYSIS/MODEL SBIR across all technologies AIST & R&A MAP * DECISION SUPPORT NOAA & EPA & LOCAL GOV NEW MEASUREMENTS SCIENCE COMMUNITY R&A NEW SCIENCE/APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS R&A *Opportunity *Funding Organization

  5. Opportunity Generation • When is a right time and place to infuse technology? • Mission science team meetings • Instrument on-board technologies • Ground IT technologies • Application technologies • NASA ESDS, NOAA, NCAR, CEOS, GEOSS • Models and science research • Operational needs • Industry • Partner, Collaborate, or Buy

  6. MISSION Process For Implementing New Data and/or Services (As Is) at PDR, Anomaly of Instrument, and Extended Review New Request Mission Phase Only. No Other Time is allowed. Start Return to Start End 3.1 NASA HQ review required? Complete Product Assessments 2.1 Mission review required? Identify request for supporting new data type/service Review/Update Rejection Justification Implement New Data Type or Service 2.3 Modify Request? Review Holdings, Product Templates and Impact Assessments 1.1 Recommend Implementation 2.2 DAAC Review Required DAAC Generate Rejection Justification 3.2 Approve Request? Flight Program Research Applied Science Review New Request 4.0 Approve Request? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No MIssion GSFC ES Mission Program Office No Mission Requirement Flow 4.0 NASA HQ Earth Science Executive 1.0 ESDIS 2.0 Science Team 3.0 Mission Yes

  7. DAAC Requirement Flow

More Related