1 / 23

Equality & Diversity: A Case Study – Rotherham MBC Zafar Saleem

Equality & Diversity: A Case Study – Rotherham MBC Zafar Saleem Community Engagement & Cohesion Manager Derby Equality & Diversity Network. Introduction. Rotherham – The Borough context 2. Weakness Solutions Current performance The future. Rotherham - Context. Rotherham in Context.

Download Presentation

Equality & Diversity: A Case Study – Rotherham MBC Zafar Saleem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Equality & Diversity: A Case Study – Rotherham MBC Zafar Saleem Community Engagement & Cohesion Manager Derby Equality & Diversity Network

  2. Introduction • Rotherham – The Borough context 2. Weakness • Solutions • Current performance • The future

  3. Rotherham - Context

  4. Rotherham in Context • Metropolitan borough in the South Yorkshire conurbation, adjoining Sheffield, Barnsley and Doncaster • 285 square kilometres • Over 50% rural • 253,000 population • 13400 employees • Economic transformation • Unemployment 3.22% (2.99% nationally)

  5. Rotherham in Context • BME population – 5.2% • Disabled people – 22.4% • Women in Rotherham earn £40 per week less than national average for women • Very small recognisable LGBT community • Gypsy & Traveller • Older People – 34% of population age 50+ • Diverse religious community • Migrants workers- growing (2000+ Roma)

  6. Rotherham in Context Population: 250,000 Non-white ethnic minority : 3.1% Asylum Seekers: 751 50 different countries unemployment rate: 3.75% The largest n/w ethnic group is Pakistani: 1.9% Disabled in community :18.86% Iranian Community LGBT 70% Rural Disabled employees: 2.06% 88%n/w/e below 50 37% children (0-15) Main Languages Spoken: English, Urdu, Arabic, French 52% is inactive

  7. Weaknesses - Our starting point

  8. “At the time of the Corporate Governance Inspection there was evidence of green shoots of improvement. The Council started from a low base, much still remains to be done and some hard decisions need to be taken” Corporate Governance Inspection Report – March 2002 • Council vision unclear with no strategic direction • Lack of confident corporate management team • Mixed quality service management teams • Limited performance management arrangements • Council operated in silos • Weak – Benefits, Public Housing Stock, Access, Education, Governance • CPA position December 2002/03 – Weak

  9. Equality & Diversity – where we started • Lacked strategic direction • Few resources • Application: ad hoc, no corporate or systematic approach • Initiatives piecemeal and non-sustainable • No impact on organisation or externally (community/partners) • Non-compliant (RES not implemented; reserved BVPIs; ESLG (Level 0); work mainly employment focussed

  10. Solutions

  11. What did we do? • Leadership and commitment • Challenge • Focus on priorities • (outcome based approach) • Capacity building • Partnership working • Embedding performance management culture – accountability • Celebrating success

  12. Leadership and commitment • Full commitment of Leader and Chief Executive • Cabinet lead for community cohesion and equalities • Strong Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) • Reporting mechanisms • Corporate Management Team • Cabinet • Democratic Renewal Scrutiny Panel • Performance and Scrutiny Overview Committee

  13. Challenge • Accelerated targets (Equality Framework for Local Government) • Self Assessment • Role of Scrutiny • Performance clinics • Corporate Equality and Diversity Strategy Group

  14. Focus on priorities • Community Strategy published 2005 - 5 key themes and 2 cross cutting themes • Equality agenda based on legal, national and local priorities • Engagement with stakeholders and communities of interest • Promotion of vision – Faces of Rotherham campaign

  15. Capacity Building - Internal • 700+ managers attended workshops in year 1 • Briefings to all employees • Member Development Programme • Reviewed and restructured Corporate Equality Strategy Group • Equality Champions and Directorate Coordinators • 215 employees trained on equality impact assessment • Corporate support through policy development, processes, guidance and toolkits. • Workforce planning • Equality and diversity competencies for all employees (PDR) • Community of interest networks and support

  16. Capacity Building - External • LGBT community groups • RCM & Inter-Faith network • Diverse BME sector • Anchor groups (VAR, REMA, RWN) • Voice & Influence (YP) • Organisations of Disabled People • Effective & Committed LSP

  17. Partnership working • Local Strategic Partnership • Shared vision – equality and fairness built into all strategies and policies (Community Strategy, NRS etc) • Joint working with partner agencies and voluntary community sector • Examples of partnership working: • Community Cohesion Group • Rotherham Ethnic Minorities Alliance • Women’s Strategy Group • Mosque Liaison Group

  18. Performance Management Culture • Raised profile (equality targets adopted as CX commitments) • Clear roles and accountability • Best practice • Service Planning Framework • Performance Management Framework • Robust performance information, monitoring, research • External audit • Focus on positives

  19. Achievements “ To stop a decline is impressive. To reverse it within just a few years and climb towards the top of the ladder is altogether a different achievement, but that is just what Rotherham MBC has done” IDeA

  20. E&D Achievement • First council or public body of any size to be recognised as achieving “excellence” under the Equality Framework for Local Government • Level 0 (2004) to Excellent (2009)

  21. What Still Needs ToBe Done ……. • EFLG improvement plan implementation • EA 2010 • Staying relevant? • Big Society • Localism Bill • New language: integration, fairness, equity • Challenge to do more for less/CSR • Place based budgets: Borough wide integration with PCT and SYP via Community Strategy and LSP • Community Cohesion • Development of communities of interest/place

  22. Thank You For Listening

More Related