Download
high resolution numerical modeling of cohesive sediment transport in estuary and continental shelf n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
High Resolution Numerical Modeling of Cohesive Sediment Transport in Estuary and Continental Shelf PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
High Resolution Numerical Modeling of Cohesive Sediment Transport in Estuary and Continental Shelf

High Resolution Numerical Modeling of Cohesive Sediment Transport in Estuary and Continental Shelf

14 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

High Resolution Numerical Modeling of Cohesive Sediment Transport in Estuary and Continental Shelf

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Taiwan-U.S. Source-to-Sink Research Workshop – NSYSU, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Feb 2008. High Resolution Numerical Modeling of Cohesive Sediment Transport in Estuary and Continental Shelf Tom T.-J. Hsu,Assistant Professor Civil & Coastal Engineering University of Florida

  2. Wright & Nittrouer [1995], Estuaries. Fate of Terrestrial Sediment in the Coastal Ocean • Initial Deposition 2. Negatively buoyant plume: Occurrence of hyperpycnal flow in Taiwan’s rivers: • 1. Positively buoyant plume: • Stable density stratification. • Flocculation process. •  Estuarine Turbidity Maximum (ETM); • frontal trapping. • Resuspension Dadson et al. 2005, JGR-Earth Surf.

  3. Need detailed field measurements and theoretical/numerical modeling on boundary layer flow and sediment transport dynamics near the bed. ~10m ~20cm Motivation Large-scale coastal models, e.g.Delft3D, Mike21, NearCoM, NOPP-CSTM, … and many others, require accurate parameterization on wave boundary layer processes. NOPP-CSTM (Community Sediment Transport Model): NOPP-CTSM, figure provided by Dr. John Warner (USGS) NearCoM, figure provided by Dr. Fengyan Shi (U Delaware).

  4. Eel Shelf slope ≈ 1/200 Wave-supported gravity-driven mudflows Overview: a recent review paper Wright & Friedrichs (2006), Cont. Shelf Res. e.g., STRATAFORM at Eel river: Traykovski et al. [2000], Cont. Shelf Res.

  5. z dilute turbulent suspension  < o lutocline mobile fluid mud o < < gel Consolidating bed > gel ~10g/l ~100g/l Fluid Mud Modeling Develop a 1DV numerical modeling framework for fluid mud transport based on Fast Equilibrium Eulerian Approximation (Ferry & Balachandar 1994) to the Eulerian Two-phase formulation – Mixture Approach • Existence of fluid mud: Hsu et al. (2007).turbulence-sediment interaction, downslope gravity-driven mudflow. • Floc properties and floc dynamics: Winterwerp (1998), Khelifa & Hill (2006) • Erodibility (Type I erosion): critical bottom stress depends on cumulative eroded mass, which is due to consolidation. • Rheological stress: e.g., Bingham-plastic. Wave-mud interaction. • Directly resolve bed consolidation and fluidization (e.g., Gibson et al. 1967). Evolution of floc aggregate structure. Winterwerp & van Kesteren (2004)

  6. z y, along-shelf α=0.002 x, cross-shelf Sherwood et al. [2004] Wave-supported Gravity-driven Mudflows Fluid mud at Po Prodelta EUROSTRATAFORM: Traykovski, Wiberg and Geyer [2007], Cont. Shelf Res. Case 1: Moderate Concentration Event Hydrodynamic Condition: r.m.s. wave velocity=0.52 m/s, weak currents Floc Properties: D=24 mµ,a = 1440 kg/m3,  nf =2.26 Erodibility: Type I erosion with Stevens et al. (2007): Rheology: OFF Floc dynamics: OFF EUROSTRATAFORM data obtained in collaboration with Peter Traykovski.

  7. Case 2: High Concentration Event Hydrodynamic Condition: r.m.s. wave velocity=0.51 m/s, weak currents Floc Properties: D=21 mµ,a = 1440 kg/m3,  nf =2.2 Erodibility: Type I erosion with Stevens et al. (2007): Rheology: ON Bingham rheology with Floc dynamics: OFF Large erodibility and rheological stress are required to model the observed wave-supported gravity-driven mudflows

  8. Summary - Wave-supported Gravity-driven Mudflows • Based on our numerical model study, we find: • critical mechanisms controlling wave-supported gravity-driven mud flows are: • Total amount of available unconsolidated mud • Turbulent-sediment interaction (density stratification) • Floc properties (fractal dimension) • Rheology • detailed intra-wave time-dependent erodibility and floc dynamics are of less importance • need concurrent measurements on floc properties and rheology