1 / 23

Mini Tower Preliminary Results

Mini Tower Preliminary Results. Xin Chen and Eduardo do Couto e Silva July 14 , 2003 Ground Software Workshop. Minitower Test. All results are PRELIMINARY These data are not intended for MC validation but to debug the data analysis chain and to study the experimental set-up.

Download Presentation

Mini Tower Preliminary Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mini Tower Preliminary Results Xin Chen and Eduardo do Couto e Silva July 14 , 2003 Ground Software Workshop

  2. Minitower Test • All results are PRELIMINARY • These data are not intended for MC validation but to debug the data analysis chain and to study the experimental set-up

  3. The Minitower Geometry LAT-TD-00582-02 Maintained by X. Chen 3% W GTFE Si layer GTRC F G G G F F Y3 X3 X2 Y2 Y1 X1 X0 Y0 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V5 V5 no silicon detectors no silicon detectors There are 8 layers instrumented with Front-End Electronics (MCMs) but only 6 layers instrumented with silicon detectors

  4. minitower minitower Data Taking Configurations Cosmic Rays Cosmic Rays 17.6 MeV g Vertical position Expected CR trigger rate 13 Hz Horizontal position Expected CR trigger rate ~ 4 Hz Expected g trigger rate ~ 0.02 Hz

  5. The Experimental Setup minitower BGO crystals Cosmic ray telescope VDG beam pipe EGSE (VME crate)

  6. The Coordinate System X Based on position of disabled or dead channels in every layer, this region (~1/8 of minitower active area) is expected to have the highest trigger efficiency Y Z Position VDG pipe at negative X and Y coordinates

  7. Event rates – TKR trigger There is reasonable agreement between MC and DATA since we assume about 20% uncertainty in the MC rates due to the knowledge of the flux.

  8. Strip Map Y layers X layers This layer with about 300 “live” strips, strongly constraints the parameter space available for triggering

  9. Muons with vertical tracker – TKR trigger only Hit Multiplicity Normalized rates in Hz DATA MC

  10. Muons with vertical tracker – TKR trigger only TOT in each layer Normalized rates in Hz DATA MC

  11. Muons with vertical tracker – TKR trigger only Track multiplicity Normalized rates in Hz

  12. Muons with vertical tracker Dead Channel list from DATA is used as input for MC Reconstructed direction DATA MC X X Y Y Z Z

  13. Muons with vertical tracker Dead Channel list from DATA is used as input for MC MC Reconstructed direction DATA X X Y Y Z Z

  14. Muons with horizontal tracker Dead Channel list from DATA is used as input for MC MC Reconstructed direction DATA X X Y Y Z Z

  15. Muons with horizontal tracker X Z Dead Channel list from DATA is used as input for MC MC Reconstructed Position DATA X X Y Y Z Z

  16. VDG DATA Taking Mode P + Li ---> Be ---> Be + gamma ( 66% 17.6 MeV, 33% 14.6 MeV ) Experiment x Mini tower Pb shield z proton Li target MC Simulation photons Only the Pb shield is implemented in the simulation

  17. Photons + Muons with horizontal tracker MC (photons only) Reconstructed Direction DATA (photons + muons) X X Y Y Z Z

  18. Photons + Muons with horizontal tracker MC (photons only) DATA (photons + muons) Reconstructed Position X X Y Y Z Z

  19. VDG Calibration Minitower : ebf0306040204959 46002 events 8158 s Rate 5.6 Hz BGO crystals : VG13.dat 46907 events 6160 s Rate 7.6 Hz calculated spectrum Used the BGO and estimate the photon rate in the minitower to be 5.7 Hz ± 30% (preliminary) measured spectrum with BGO crystals G. Godfrey Energy (MeV) cosmics

  20. Signal + Background (1) VDG g signal + C.R. background ~ 2 hours of data taking Trigger rate VDG + C.R. ~ 5.6 Hz C.R. ~ 0.5 Hz Cosmic ray background (mm) (mm) We understand the coordinate system of our set-up since both X and Y reconstructed positions are negative 58% of triggered signal + background events were reconstructed 81% of triggered cosmic ray background events were reconstructed The VDG provides valuable DATA to study reconstruction efficiencies of photons

  21. Signal + Background (2) VDG g signal + C.R. background Y m Z g Cosmic ray background cos(q) Photons impinging on top face of minitower

  22. Photon candidate Top of minitower Top of minitower Reconstructed photon direction Y Z View X Z View

  23. Plans • Continue to look at these data until the next hardware (TKR+CAL) is delivered (mid to end of August) • Analyzing the TKR data at different detector thresholds • Studying possible time effects • The focus now is to develop all the online and offline infrastructure necessary for the next mini tower tests

More Related