1 / 56

Gameplay and Design Issues in Outdoor Augmented Reality Games

Gameplay and Design Issues in Outdoor Augmented Reality Games. SPEAKERS: Assoc. Prof. Bruce Thomas Director of Wearable Computer Lab, UniSA Chief Technical Officer, a_rage pty ltd Dr. Wayne Piekarski, Assoc Director, WCL Director of Research, a_rage pty ltd Benjamin Avery

atira
Download Presentation

Gameplay and Design Issues in Outdoor Augmented Reality Games

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gameplay and Design Issues in Outdoor Augmented Reality Games

  2. SPEAKERS: Assoc. Prof. Bruce Thomas Director of Wearable Computer Lab, UniSA Chief Technical Officer, a_rage pty ltd Dr. Wayne Piekarski, Assoc Director, WCL Director of Research, a_rage pty ltd Benjamin Avery UniSA Computer and Information Science Honours student, WCL Lead Game Programmer, a_rage pty ltd Joe Velikovsky Creative Director & Game Design Lead, a_rage pty ltd

  3. OVERVIEW: 3 AR Game Case Studies ARQuake – Assoc Prof Bruce Thomas 3-D Moon Lander & the ARAGE Hardware – Ben Avery 3-D Sky Invaders – Joe Velikovsky

  4. Gameplay & Design Issues in Outdoor Augmented Reality GamesCase Study:ARQuakeAssoc. Prof. Bruce Thomas, WCL UniSA

  5. What do people like & dislike about ARQuake? • What aspects of the game should be highlighted? • What should be avoided?

  6. ARQuake in a nutshell: • Built in 2000, first `Outdoor AR GPS’ game • Take a desktop pc First-Person-Shooter game and modify it - to be used as an indoor/outdoor AR game. • Track the user’s head orientation and position in an indoor/outdoor setting. • Player, NPCs (Critters, Monsters), & Game Objects (Health, Guns, Armour, Ammo) are all rendered normally. • Model physical buildings - and render the game walls black, co-located with physical walls.

  7. ARQuake in a nutshell: • Black will appear transparent in HMD to the user, but the rendered black graphics will occlude monsters, critters and game objects. • Virtual walls, corridors, pillars, and doors are all still rendered. • As the user walks around the physical world moving their head, the game will update with this orientation and position information.

  8. Original/Desktop Quake

  9. Augmented Reality:

  10. Non-AR View:

  11. AR View:

  12. Example Critters:Quake vs ARQuake

  13. demon New textures Old textures

  14. enforcer

  15. soldier

  16. zombie

  17. ARQuakeIn-Game Footage: Video 1

  18. Field of View (FOV) • FOV of the HMD was 24 degrees horizontal • Necessitated excessive head-turning by the users. • thought to be “extremely narrow”. • FOV of 90 degrees • commented that this felt much better. • Registration problems. • FOV of 120 degrees. • “weird”; difference in parallax: physical  virtual - uncomfortable.

  19. Visuals That Worked Well • Floating objects worked well: • “they looked like they belonged in the game world.” • Users simply accepted them as part of the game. • One effect the users liked was flames: • “the fire in ARQuake looked pretty good” and “it looked genuinely like fire.”

  20. Walking Around • Users were able to walk through the virtual walls. • “Walking through walls, while being an interesting idea….. It looked solid, but I wasn't worried about walking through it because I knew that there was a room on the other side. Strangely enough, I didn't want to go out the other side….” • One user noticed at one point, they were physically walking up a hill, but the game depicted flat ground. They stated it seemed to feel, while unexpected, easier to walk up because it looked flat.

  21. Interaction • Users experienced difficulties picking objects up. • Objects “tantalizingly” within arm’s reach, but could not be picked up. • This problem became quite frustrating for some of the users. • Opening and closing doors - not difficult • Flying monsters require the correct weapon and strategy

  22. Conclusion: • Users overall, enjoyed ARQuake • Issues with Field Of View. • Small orientation errors - quite noticeable. • The standard shape of doors & corridors in Quake worlds - not well-suited to ARQuake. • The world feels better to the user, if it is brightly-lit. • Use of skybox/sky colour should be avoided. • Users did not like the use of shadows. • Floating objects work quite well in ARQuake.

  23. A Study of Performance of Consumer Level HardwareforOutdoor Augmented Reality Gaming by Benjamin Avery Supervisor: Assoc Prof Bruce Thomas Assoc. Supervisor: Dr Wayne Piekarski

  24. This Presentation: • Background • AR On-The-Cheap • Game Technology • Example AR Game: 3D Moon Lander • Conclusion

  25. a-rage • Research for a-rage AR game dev company • a_rage & ITEK provided scholarship for studies

  26. Background: • Augmented Reality is: the overlay of computer-generated images onto the real world, using a Head Mounted Display

  27. Other Indoor AR Games Examples of Indoor AR games: • AquaGauntlet • AR2Hockey • MIND-WARPING • TouchSpace • etc

  28. Indoor is Easy: • Trackers can be tethered • Very accurate trackers available • Controlled environment Image courtesy polhemus.com

  29. Outdoor is Harder: • Unpredictable environments • Lower-accuracy trackers • Limited computer power • Limited power • Mobility and reliability • OST vs VST HMDs

  30. Outdoor AR Games Only two real examples: • ARQuake • Human Pacman

  31. …I want one at home? • Expensive systems exist • Accurate tracking(50cm), high-resolution, compact • Cost: AU$20,000 • Too expensive for kids to play games on! • Need a consumer- level alternative

  32. The Question: Can AR games be designed and implemented, in such a way as to make them playable on low-performance level hardware?

  33. AR `On-The-Cheap’ Our consumer-level hardware system: Possible cost: ~$500

  34. What problems does this cause? • Cheap GPS is only accurate to 5 meters • Trackers ‘drift’ • PAL/NTSC resolution • Limited input so: • in your backyard is not yet possible… 

  35. Game Design vs AR Technology! • Make the game fit the hardware limitations • eg. OST - ‘ghosts’ in Ghosts of Sweet Auburn • GPS ‘snap-to’ grid system, with hysteresis • Picking the correct tracker • Avoid registration with the real world

  36. 3-D Moon Lander • Example AR game - demonstrating the concepts • Based on 1979 Atari game Lunar Lander - and pc clones

  37. GPS Snap-To: Video

  38. Conclusion • Many games can be designed to work on this hardware platform • Problems do exist, but careful Game Design can work around these • We have tested the system outdoors and the GPS snapping and tracker work well • Further play-testing by a_rage will reveal any other problems this system may offer, which we can then improve on.

  39. AR Game Design • joe velikovsky [Game Design Lead]game designer former national games market analyst, InformBACS, AFTRS JOETEEVEE.COM10 years in the games industry

  40. HMV PROTOTYPE

  41. Design Elements • 3-D AR `port’ of Space Invaders • 5 m GPS = • 2 locations 5m apart • (Turret & Bunker) • Immersive game space = N,W,E, • Flames & floating objects = UFO FPS! Set in 1950’s • UI = intuitive = HMV is pointing device as per ARQuake • Content = TV set! • Directional sound • Dev cycle = short

  42. 5m GPS TURRET 5m BUNKER

  43. In-Game Video

  44. AR OUTDOORS/INDOORS

  45. "I hope that peripheral companies start to look at opportunities for getting the joystick out of peoples’ hands and doing something different, - or getting us away from the TV screen with something like Head-Mounted Displays. I would love to see someone take on this challenge of establishing a real virtual environment with the power that the new consoles should provide." Ted Price, CEO, Insomniac Games Spyro, Ratchet & Clank from IDG 2003 Games Industry White Paper p. 94-95 IDG 2003 GAMES INDUSTRY WHITE PAPER

  46. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY 1) Port `hit’ games over to AR [Space Invaders: Old Games, New Platform] 2) K.I.S. - Keep It Simple! [Games low on Graphics / high on Gameplay] 3) Play-Balance/Flow Theory - `Challenge & Reward’ 4) 10 Mini-games (like EyeToy bundle) 5) Risk management - Shorter Dev Cycle! Later: bigger budgets, and longer games

  47. GAME DESIGN 1) USER-FOCUSED GAMES (`Plug & Play’) 2) SIMPLE ADDICTIVE GAMEPLAY = FUN FACTOR 3) HIGH REPLAY VALUE 4) Age: 15+ - for physical co-ordination 5) SAFETY - in goggle view is never `off’

  48. Shoot-em-up: 3-D

  49. Arcade Platform

  50. Adventure Puzzle

More Related