1 / 21

GPS-INS resampling VERIFICATION

GPS-INS resampling VERIFICATION. Final Presentation Annual project (Part B) Winter semester תש"ע ( (2009. Students: Oren Hyatt, Alex Dutov Supervisor: Mony Orbach. Abstract.

astin
Download Presentation

GPS-INS resampling VERIFICATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GPS-INSresampling VERIFICATION Final PresentationAnnual project (Part B)Winter semesterתש"ע ((2009 Students: Oren Hyatt, Alex Dutov Supervisor: MonyOrbach

  2. Abstract • A GPS system isn’t fast enough, to meet updating requirements of high speed systems. The algorithm using GPS/INS system, coupled with an integrated particles filter, for error estimation, was developed by Prof. Yaakov Oshman and Mark Koifman, from the Aeronautics faculty of the Technion. • Part A of this project, deals with the implementation the resampling and regularization units, the algorithm uses. Those parts, were defined as a possible “bottle neck”, in terms of time constraints. • In this part (part B), the resampling was brought and verified using the Generic environment.

  3. Project’s goal • Learning the complete system protocol and using it to work with Generic. • Resampling’s verification using Generic Environment. • Time requirements checking. • HW resources requirements checking.

  4. Resampling W[0.0.28] Index_out[0.16.0] Reject insignificant particles. Duplicate remained particles, with respect to their relative weight.* Format’s Notation: X.YY.ZZZ ~ sign ; number ; fraction *see part A for more info

  5. Generic • Generic Program is a testbench for GPS-INS system. • Provides input vectors and stores the results in .BIN file. • Allows to test all parts of the algorithm in different points of time. • Uses the same protocol for all parts of the algorithm.

  6. Generic Interface FPGA selection (We work with FPGA #3) Time point selection Weights input from .BIN/Indexes output to .BIN Number of Indexes in Output Control buttons Propogate 30K weights

  7. Testing environment • IC1 – vhd that was created by ProcWizard for Frame1 and its .bdf file is used by Generic Program. • Frame1 – System main controler. • Generic – a testbench unit. • Resampling – our unit. IC1 Frame1 Generic Resampling

  8. Resampling main controler

  9. Test results (Generic vsMatlab) T=201 Number of indexes misplaced: 829

  10. Test results (HW vsMatlab) T=1001 Number of indexes misplaced: 786

  11. Test results (HW vsMatlab) T=2001 Number of indexes misplaced: 247

  12. Test results (HW vsMatlab) T=3101 Number of indexes misplaced: 1127

  13. T=4301 Number of indexes misplaced: 935

  14. Results Analysis • Only the time points provided by Generic were tested. • Generic test results are very close to the matlab test. • There is an error in indexes caused by rounding (see next slide).

  15. Error source • There is a step in algorithm which adds (1/30K) to the random number. Matlab precision is better than Generic, so there is a misfit in some indexes. • Generic: • Matlab: • Error = • It’s the only error source, next slide will demonstrate it.

  16. Error source demonstration T=201 Different value in Matlab and Generic Same value in Matlab and Generic Number of indexes misplaced: 829 Number of indexes misplaced: 0

  17. Summary of the unit: Summary of the unit: Summary of the unit: Table 2: resampling characteristics Timing and Resources • HW resources (including the new controller) • HW resources (without the new controller) • Timing(without the new controller) • Timing(including the new controller)

  18. Problems and Solutions • There was no written manual about Generic. • Trial and error solution. • Generic has several bugs (see Generic document). • Some were found by Ayal (D1127). • Some were found by us (and again, trial and error apprauch). • Some code passes Quartus simulation but didn’t work on board. • Several code confuguration were tried until it worked.

  19. Summary • All the input vectors were successfully tested. • Error source were found (no HW bug, but accuracy difference between Generic and Matlab). • HW resources slightly increased (we still can manage it). • Because of a new controller and the Generic protocol frequency has been reduced (10 times), but it still meet real-time requirement.

  20. Questions

  21. The END

More Related