1 / 36

One-Stop Shopping for Journal Holdings: The Ideal and the Reality

One-Stop Shopping for Journal Holdings: The Ideal and the Reality. Presented by Janet Crum Head, Library Systems & Cataloging Oregon Health & Science University Library http://www.ohsu.edu/library/staff/crumj December 5, 2006. What I’ll Cover.

ashton
Download Presentation

One-Stop Shopping for Journal Holdings: The Ideal and the Reality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. One-Stop Shopping for Journal Holdings: The Ideal and the Reality Presented by Janet Crum Head, Library Systems & Cataloging Oregon Health & Science University Library http://www.ohsu.edu/library/staff/crumj December 5, 2006

  2. What I’ll Cover A. The universe of serial information, how it has changed in recent years, and why that causes problems for users (I may not have a solution, but I can certainly admire the problem) B. User expectations, usability, and user interfaces C. What happens when we try to put A and B together: What can we do now? And what remains a problem? D. A quick tour of OHSU’s imperfect solution

  3. Every day at the reference desk… Let me see if the library owns that journal… How can I get this article?

  4. A complex answer to a simple question • Library owns journal in print or microform • Library has purchased electronic access to journal • Library has purchased aggregator database that includes journal • Journal (or desired article) may be freely available online • Article may be available via consortial arrangement with another library (near or far) • Article may be available via interlibrary loan

  5. So where does the patron have to look? • Catalog – print and microform holdings, some electronic holdings • A-Z list of electronic journals • Online resources outside library: • Google • Publisher site • Open access database (e.g. DOAJ) • Institutional repository • Preprint archive/PubMed Central/other article repository • Union/consortial catalog, WorldCat, etc. • ILL request form

  6. The $64,000 question(s) • Should we provide one-stop shopping for all (or nearly all) of these cases? • If so, is it possible? • If so, how?

  7. But first, what is one-stop shopping? • User only needs to know about one place to look • Integrate physical and electronic collections • Move seamlessly from discovery to delivery (D2D chain – Lorcan Dempsey) • What matters isn’t where the user starts but where the user finishes

  8. Why one-stop shopping? • Aggregate demand: Every book (or journal) its reader1 • Lower transaction costs for user and library: Save the time of the reader – and the library staff2 • Consider principles of web usability • Consider principles of user behavior 1-2. Dempsey, Lorcan (2006). Libraries and the long tail: some thoughts about libraries in a network age. D-Lib Magazine 12(4).

  9. Web usability:Don’t make me think! • Principles of web usability relevant to this discussion1: • “Don’t make me think” • “Instructions must die” • “Satisficing” = satisfy + suffice • “It doesn’t matter how many times I have to click, as long as each click is a mindless, unambiguous choice.” • Bottom line: If they have to ask for help – or read instructions – we’ve failed. 1 Krug, Steve. Don’t Make Me Think. 2nd ed. New Riders. 2005.

  10. Why one-stop shopping? User behavior • From 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: • Focus on user’s point of view, not the library’s • Users like self-service applications in libraries • “Librarians cannot change user behavior and so need to meet the user”

  11. The Dilemma • We need to design systems that guide users to journals without making them think, read, attend an instruction session, or ask a librarian for help • The process can’t be overly complicated or require (much) training, but… • Serials are inherently complicated and have become more so in recent years What to do…

  12. How far should we go?

  13. How far can we go? What we can do now Consider one-stop shopping an ideal to be approached but never quite reached • Integrate print and electronic holdings, including aggregator titles and some free things • Use link resolvers to direct users to print and electronic holdings, some free stuff, consortial catalogs, ILL request forms, search engines

  14. Integrate print and electronic2 options • Journals database separate from catalog • Print and electronic in the catalog

  15. The case for the catalog • Allows library collections to be truly integrated • More sustainable over the long term • Devote local efforts to partnering with vendors rather than developing ever-more-complicated local systems • Exciting advances in the works for catalogs. Shouldn’t our journal collections be included?

  16. How far can we go?

  17. Two challenges • Bibliographic control (or lack thereof) Bibliographic control (n.): “The operation or process by which recorded information is organized or arranged and thereby made readily retrievable.”1 • Tradeoff between selection and workload 1. Chan, Lois Mai. Cataloging and Classification: An Introduction. 2nd ed. 1994.

  18. A continuum of bibliographic control Individual electronic journals Cooperatively-owned titles Aggregated collections Print journals Free titles Free articles Good Poor

  19. Tradeoff between selection and workload • Big aggregated collections often contain titles outside the library’s usual collecting scope (e.g. Jack and Jill) • Easier to load them all than to pick and choose • But loading them all clutters your catalog/journal list • And scope doesn’t always predict use (e.g. OHSU’s People problem)

  20. Link resolver as compromise? • Link resolver offers compromise approach • Link to some materials with poor bibliographic control - but may be difficult to offer article-level linking • Way to provide access to some aggregated collections with less work • Could link to holdings available via consortial arrangements • Not quite one-stop shopping but still provides access • BUT too many links confuse users – where to draw the line? • AND link resolvers don’t always work correctly

  21. OHSU’s solution • http://catalogs.ohsu.edu • ERM • Have loaded all electronic journals purchased or acquired via aggregated collections • Plan to load selected collections of free journals soon • Web interface • Journal scope • A-Z browse from catalog data • EBSCO A-Z list for free journals • Usability testing underway • Link resolver – WebBridge • Article-level linking when possible; • otherwise journal-level linking for all holdings • Journal-level linking for free collections

  22. Front page of OHSU journal scope

  23. Journal bibliographic display

  24. Resource and license display

  25. Back to the journal scope for another title search…

  26. ERM brief bibliographic record

  27. Title browse from journal scope

  28. A-Z browse with live data from catalog • Uses Cold Fusion to query catalog via Oracle tables • Can limit to electronic or limit by location for print • Links to catalog record so we don’t have to parse holdings data • Enables us to offer title browse without maintaining data in more than one place

  29. Link to free e-journals Link to free e-journals from EBSCO A-Z

  30. Free e-journals from EBSCO A-Z

  31. WebBridge link in PubMed

  32. WebBridge menu of links • OHSU-only links go directly to article • Free links go to journal – compromise between workload and access

  33. To Sum Up • Today technology allows us to • Integrate print and electronic in a single resource (preferably the catalog) • Use link resolvers to direct users to print and electronic holdings, some free stuff, consortial catalogs • But many barriers and questions remain • What should we do? Philosophical questions about the mission and purpose of the library and its catalog • What can we do? • Technical limitations • Lack of bibliographic control • Workload

  34. Key points • The landscape of journal literature is more complex now than it was in the print-only world • But users expect more simplicity and do not want to think (much) • One-stop shopping is a Good Thing if it can be done without excessive complexity for the user • One-stop shopping is an ideal we’ll never fully achieve (think universal bibliographic control for journal articles) • We can achieve a certain amount of one-stop shopping now, but there’s much that’s still difficult • How far we go toward this goal should be based on library mission and user needs

  35. Questions and comments? For more information: • Download slides and notes: http://www.ohsu.edu/library/staff/crumj/nwiug2006/one_stop_shopping.zip • E-mail me! crumj@ohsu.edu • Read the long version of this presentation: • Crum, J. One-stop shopping for journal literature. Manuscript submitted for publication. Submitted for inclusion in Yu, H. & Breivold, S. (Eds). (in press). Handbook of Research on Library Electronic Resource Management. Idea Group Reference.

  36. Thanks!

More Related