1 / 27

Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies: A Territorial Impact Assessment

This research project explores the governance of territorial and urban policies and its impact on territorial cohesion, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The project seeks to identify factors that characterize good governance and assess their effects on GDP/GVA, employment, welfare, and public services sustainability. It also examines territorial features, dynamics, and institutional frameworks of territorial policies. The project provides policy recommendations and comparisons through benchmarking and evaluation of results.

arnoldd
Download Presentation

Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies: A Territorial Impact Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Territorial Impact Assessment of Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies in ESPON Space ESPON PROJECT 2.3.2: GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL Luxembourg, 14th October 2005 Joaquín Farinós Dasí University of Valencia

  2. A very particular topic of research • Governance is not a policy but a way of design and applies different policies with territorial impact • Territorial and urban are spatial based policies • Tailored application of TIA, adapted to … unavailability of statistical data and indicators … difficult to define an ‘a priori’ hypothesis … not possible nor convenient to ‘encapsulate’ governance ‘a priori’ …inductive/qualitative approach especially appropriate … integration inductive (hypothesis formulation) and deductive (test) …benchmarking in order to learn about reasons of good and failed examples and their possible transferability • Appropriate level: State (National vs. State). Regions/NUTS 3? • Original project that uses experience we are gaining as a source and base to help build the theory concerning governance and territorial cohesion

  3. Two ways to understand the topic • Territorial Governance can be seen as a simple application in the urban and territorial field of general principles of governance or, • As a process with specific features because its object is the territory and its aims to manage territorial dynamics through the pilotage of a multiplicity of actors sharing a common agreed objective (spatial visions to improve territorial cohesion at different levels ) • The second one is more strategic but much more difficult to assess for which qualitative data and inductive methods can be very useful • We try to cover both perspectives in our project, however constraints of data, time and resources impose limits that only allows, in some cases, to find out hypothesis for future developments

  4. Operational definition of governance and formulation of hypothesis

  5. Primary Hypotheses • principles of good governance have positive impact over a territory; that is, governance practices should improve territorial cohesion objective - impacts in GDP/GVA, employment, welfare and public services and sustainability • it is possible to recognize and assess factors that characterize good governance (prerequisites, “mechanisms”); they could be “transferables” • some specific territorial features and dynamics also as institutional frameworks of territorial and urban policies have positive effects - good governance is mainly to be assessed on a territory-basis

  6. Context Territorial features and dynamics To describe Favourable territorial preconditions To evaluate Policies Institutional frameworks of territorial policies To describe TGAs Processes To evaluate Results Types of indicators/criteria

  7. Methodological Overview

  8. The need of integrating Quantitative – Qualitative Approaches S C A L E S BENCHMARKING POLICY RECOMENDATIONS COMPARISON: Analyse potential impacts of Good Governance on Urban & Territorial Policies Available Data + Data collection

  9. Method in National Overviews: Context update • NOs and CSs constitute, as sequential steps, the way in which we try to know territorial governance in its three dimensions: as structure (or preconditions for governance), as process and as results. • Information from the NOs was exploited and organized in a systematized way, mainly through tabulation in semi-closed tables with limited alternatives for answers. - as a result a Synthesis Report was elaborated - national information was tested in a second round with national writers - this information was placed by countries into a matrix (‘yes/not’) - the matrix was again circulated among TPG members - this matrix was the starting point to mapping

  10. Mapping Exercise *Governance Score calculated summing up the result of the Score components of five headers of National Overviews: 1) officialacceptance of governance and principles, 2) changes in formal government in the direction of governance, 3) Experience with participation processes, 4) experience with partnerships, 5) extent of financial dependence of local government on central government.

  11. Method in National Overviews: Context update • So, it was followed a continued system of mutual assessment (insider investigator triangulation method) between TPG (broadest in ESPON1), Working Package responsible and Project Coordination • Open questions for NOs: - improve systematisation of all amount of information & identify main/key issues - contrast for agreement following a Delphi method (closer to theory triangulation method) between: 232 project, other related ESPON projects and national experts from ESPON Contact Points • Limits: time and resources, and previous failed experiences in otherESPON projects. • Next research steps concentrated on specific issues considered more consistent (in a comparative way) while others remain for future developments.

  12. Specific Issues from National Overviews for Case Studies ·As structural conditions - Changes in formal government in the direction of governance ·      - Priority emphasis on governance objectives as indicated in NO ·     - Conditions leading to shifts towards governance: Positive elements are: · long tradition of “working together” and citizens’ participation, · innovations in the field of partnership creation, · reorganization of spatial planning system and · introduction of new instruments and agencies ·      -  Catalysts and barriers to changes to governance ·CSs mainly focus in governance as process

  13. Collecting Data from EU and National Statistical Sources (1/2)

  14. Collecting Data from EU and National Statistical Sources (2/2)

  15. Matrix for Case Studies Proposal

  16. Case Studies Map

  17. Guidelines for Case Studies

  18. ‘Numeric’ approach towards Case Studies(1/5)

  19. ‘Numeric’ approach towards Case Studies(2/5)

  20. ‘Numeric’ approach towards Case Studies (3/5)

  21. ‘Numeric’ approach towards Case Studies (4/5)

  22. ‘Numeric’ approach towards Case Studies (5/5)

  23. Looking for Data and Indicators * Space has to be seen as an encompassing category

  24. Starting set of Indicators

  25. Starting set of Indicators (*) Delta valuates difference between two data or two reference points) ** The indicators on spatial aspects are used to further differentiate the regional situation. Source: IRPUD

  26. LOOKING FOR A REGIONAL TYPOLOGY • By combining the structural with the dynamic indicators we might at least achieve a typology of regions

  27. Thank you for your attention!!

More Related