1 / 54

Oral Agents in Management of Type 2 Diabetes

Oral Agents in Management of Type 2 Diabetes . Nemanja Stojanovi ć Consultant Endocrinologist Queen’s Hospital, Romford . We will talk about. T2DM in general… Metformin Sulphonylureas + PPG regulators α - Glucosidase Inhibitors Statistics Glitazones and meta- analysis

arnie
Download Presentation

Oral Agents in Management of Type 2 Diabetes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oral Agents in Management ofType 2 Diabetes Nemanja Stojanović Consultant Endocrinologist Queen’s Hospital, Romford

  2. We will talk about • T2DM in general… • Metformin • Sulphonylureas + PPG regulators • α-Glucosidase Inhibitors • Statistics • Glitazones and meta- analysis • DPP-4 inhibitors and meta- analysis • GLP-1 analogues

  3. Definition • Fasting plasma glucose 7mmol/l- 2 occasions • 2 h plasma glucose or random glucose of 11.1 mmol/l

  4. BM’s

  5. Normal 24h profile

  6. T1DM: Relationship between HbA1c and Mean Glucose Dia Care2002: 25: 275-8

  7. “Drug therapies are replacing a lot of medicines as we used to know it…” George W Bush

  8. Treatment Diet, Exercise

  9. Medications:Metformin SulphonylureasPPGsAcarbose

  10. Metformin NH NH2 C NH2 Guanidine NH NH CH3 C NH2 N C NH CH3 Galega officinalis Metformin

  11. Metformin : Non- Glycaemic Effects • Abdominal obesity- stabilizes body weight; reduces weight gain and can facilitate weight loss • Reduces progression of IGT to type 2 diabetes • Dyslipidaemia: VLDL-TG, LDL-C, HDL-C • Procoagulant state: PAI-1,fibrinogen and platelet aggregation

  12. Metformin :contraindications • Cr> 150 umol/l • Hypoxic states- CCF/acute heart failure- sepsis- Severe COPD • Severe liver disease • Alcoholism • History of lactic acidosis • Radiological contrast

  13. Insulin Secretaguoges • SU • Repeglanide • Nateglinide • Glibenclamide

  14. Insulin Secretaguoges: Concerns • Hypoglycemia • Weight gain • Cardiovascular disease risk

  15. α-Glucosidase Inhibitors • Take within 15' of a major meal • Increase the dose gradually • SE/benefit dose 50mg tds

  16. α-Glucosidase Inhibitors: Side effects • Deranged LFT’s high doses • Ileus Japanese. • Contraindications:- IBD- Malabsorption- Bowel obstruction- Liver failure- Cr clearance<25 ml/min

  17. Thiazolidinediones Pharmacokinetics of TZD’s Pioglitazone Rosiglitazone

  18. Reduce HbA1c by 1-2% Peripheral vascular resistance : 4mmHg in 24-h mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure Lipids - Convert small, dense LDL particles to large, buoyant LDL particles - Increase plasma HDL cholesterol - Decrease plasma triglycerides if they are elevated (>200 mg/dl) Thiazolidinedions (Glitazones)

  19. Pioglitazone vs Rosiglitazone Dia Care 2005: 1547-54

  20. Rosiglitazone

  21. Before We Start • Rofecoxib • Muraglitazar • Rosiglitazone • Rofecoxib= Vioxx • SE Nissen

  22. Odds Ratio • Odds of an event occurring in a patient in the experimental group relative to that of a patient in the control group

  23. Confidence Interval and Odds Ratio • Odds ratio, for the result to be statistically significant, the 95% confidence interval should not overlap 1 (i.e. the odds ratios within the confidence interval should all be >1 or <1, the no difference point)

  24. Nissen SE, Wolski K. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2457-2471 • Analysed 42 out of 48 trials • 6 trials without CVS events ruled out of analysis • Trial duration ≥ 24 weeks • No time to event analysis • Mean age 57 years

  25. Nissen SE, Wolski K. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2457-2471 Caution about use… Limitations of the study acknowledged May increase CVS risk

  26. Interim analysis at 3.9 yrs Non- inferiority Study !! 4447 patients 40- 75 years A1c 7.1-9% BMI> 25 2220 Rosi + Met or SU 2227 Met + SU Primary Outcomes - Myocardial infarction - Congestive heart failure Stroke TIA Unstable angina Unplanned CVS revascularization Amputation of extremities Death from CVS cause RECORD Trial

  27. RECORD Study : Problems • Expected event rate 11% p.a. • Actual event rate 2% p.a. • Expected study dropout rate 2% p.a. • Actual study dropout rate 3% p.a. • As a result the study is underpowered

  28. RECORD: Conclusion • Rosiglitazone association with an increased risk of heart failure acknowledged • As the study was underpowered, it is nit possible to determine whether the drug was associated with anincrease in the risk of myocardial infarction

  29. Pioglitazone

  30. PROactive • 5238 patients • HbA1c above 6.5% • At least one of the following • Previous MI • Previous CVA • PTCA • ACS> 3months prior to the study entry • History of intermittent claudication Lancet; 366: 1279-89

  31. Primary Endpoints - Composite of all cause mortality, MI, CVA, unstable angina, PTCA, Revascularisation procedures, amputations Secondary Endpoints Time to death of any of the disease endpoints - MI CVA Unstable angina etc PROactive Lancet; 366: 1279-89

  32. PROactive • NNT 49 over 3 years to prevent an event • 21 first MI would be saved in 1000 patients started on pioglitazone • Heart failure was increased in pioglitazone group( Odds ratio 1.38), but LVF mortality was equal

  33. Pioglitazone Meta-analysis • 16390 Patients • Pioglitazone n= 8554; Control n= 7836 • Primary Endpoint: Composite of Death, Non-fatal MI and Non-fatal CVA • Secondary Endpoint Heart Failure

  34. Primary endpoint Pioglitazone 4.4% vs Control 5.5% p=0.05 HR= 0.82; CI 0.72- 0.94 Time to event apparent after 1 year Heart Failure: Pioglitazone 2.3% vs Control 1.8% p=0.02 HR 1.4 No difference in fatal HF!!! Pioglitazone did well…

  35. The PERISCOPE Trial • 547 patients randomised: pioglitazone vs glimepiride • Age 35- 85 • HbA1C 6-9% • Angiographic Coronary a stenosis 20-50% • Target vessel stenosis had to be less than 50% throughout 4cm segment JAMA 2008; 299: 1561- 73

  36. The PERISCOPE Trial JAMA 2008; 299: 1561- 73

  37. ACCORD Trial • Intensive glycaemic management • Target HbA1c 6.4% • Stopped a month ago… • Increased mortality in active treatment group • Analysis is awaited

  38. New Kids on the Block DPP-4 inhibitors GLP-1 mimetics

  39. Of Men and Mice • Dipeptidyl Peptidase – 4 (DPP-4) degrades • Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Peptide (GIP):improves glycaemic control in mice - Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ( GLP-1): improves glycaemic control in mice and men

  40. DDP-4 Knock Out Mice • Improved glucose tolerance • Elevated GLP-1 and GIP levels • Resistance to diet induced obesity and hyperglycaemia

  41. DDP-4 Knock Out Mice • Increased pain threshold • Reduced stress like responses • Reduced number of CD4 cells in spleen • Immune and inflammatory responses increased in experimental arthritis

  42. DPP-4 other Biological Activities • Loss of DPP-4 in tumours: > aggressive behaviour • Implicated in control of immune and lymphocyte function • Cell migration

  43. Sitagliptin Studies

  44. Vildagliptin Studies

  45. Sitagliptin In addition to TZD OR Metformin OR SU ± Metformin Dose 100mg OD Vildagliptin In combination with - TZD OR Metformin SU: 50mg OD Indications 50 mg BD

  46. Exenatide • GLP-1 analogue • 5-10 ug BD • Injection • Licensed with SU/Metformin or in combination • Induces ~2kg weight loss

More Related