1 / 8

David Johnstone Director of Social Services Devon County Council

The value of FAME NP to Social Services and what it means to Local Authorities and Multi-Agency working. David Johnstone Director of Social Services Devon County Council Chair of the ADSS Standards and Performance Committee. MODERNISATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES. Enabling and Empowering

arne
Download Presentation

David Johnstone Director of Social Services Devon County Council

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The value of FAME NP toSocial Services and what it meansto Local Authorities and Multi-Agency working David Johnstone Director of Social Services Devon County Council Chair of the ADSS Standards and Performance Committee

  2. MODERNISATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES • Enabling and Empowering • Integrated/flexible service provision • Customer Focussed • ‘e’ enabled • joint working • information sharing • accessible records • outcome focussed • flexible working • Accountable

  3. FAME WILL FACILITATE • framework for multi-agency information sharing • provision of efficient, effective holistic services • effective and appropriate information sharing • development of national standards and protocols • develop multi-agency toolkits

  4. MAIN DRIVERS • E-GOVERNMENT • NPfIT • Information for Social Care ISA ESCR NCRS ICS SAP CAF

  5. ISA MINIMUM REQUIREMENTBY MARCH 2004 • EVIDENCE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION SHARING BETWEEN HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES • COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF ASSESSMENT, RISK FACTORS, THRESHOLDS AND ELIGIBILITY • COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE DIRECTORY • PUBLISH INFO ABOUT CONFIDENTIALITY AND ACCESS TO RECORDS • DEVELOPED PROTOCOLS FOR INFORMATION SHARING COVERING HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CARE • PUBLISH GUIDANCE ON OBTAINING AND DOCUMENTING CONSENT • UNDERSTANDING OF AUTHORITY’S SPECIFIC BUSINESS NEEDS FOR INFO SHARING • CONSIDERATION TO SYSTEM INTEROPERABILITY AT LOCAL LEVEL

  6. ISA: PROGRESS REVIEWUNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2004 • 69% met the March 2004 requirements • 30% “only a bit behind” • Common barriers: • insufficient/conflicting guidance from central government • complexity of task • time and resources to bring about complex change • uncertainty over legality of information sharing

  7. FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES holistic approach to e-government FOR HEALTH, EDUCATION, SOCIAL SERVICES consistent standards and protocols identify common ground (ESCR/NCRS) focus on tangible wins ISA CAF ICS SAP WHAT NEXT (1) ?

  8. WHAT NEXT (2) ? • FOR GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS • listen to and learn from us • think • be realistic and consistent • talk to each other • FOR FAME AND ODPM • learn from success and failure • publish the findings (multi-media) • standards, tools and protocols to inform strategies • E-Government • NPfIT • Information for Social Care

More Related