1 / 20

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 22 April 2014- Manila

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 22 April 2014- Manila. Agenda. Introduction Guidance on the provision of hand tools ( FAO) Consolidated FSAC output monitoring report (Nov to March ) FSAC presentation to the Government Livelihood Cluster

armand
Download Presentation

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 22 April 2014- Manila

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Food Securityand Agriculture- Philippines22 April 2014- Manila

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Guidance on the provision of hand tools (FAO) • Consolidated FSAC output monitoring report (Nov to March) • FSAC presentation to the Government Livelihood Cluster • Follow-up on the seeds post distribution monitoring • AOB

  3. FSAC Overal Approach • In line with the SRP and Early Recovery Livelihoods and Agriculture plan: • Complement and support Govt efforts • Closely coordinate with Govt task forces and agencies throughout, both operationally and strategically.

  4. Implementation Plan FFA/CFA

  5. FAO projects on supporting small-scale coconut farmers

  6. FAO projects on supporting small-scale fisheries

  7. Other FSAC Partners Planned projects on Support to Fisheries

  8. FSAC Plans-Way Forward • Fostering resilience and supporting the most vulnerable • Workshop on livestock integration planned in Iloilo on 23/24 April • Working closely with BFAR to ensure sustainability of fishery resources and safe fishing • FAO scaling up operations & technical assistance, also with the aim of building back better • Partners scaling up fishing gears, other inputs, cash support, mariculture • Partners scaling up cash for assets activities • Fisheries Technical working group in Tacloban & Roxas (BFAR-lead and FAO co-lead). • Working closely with DA/PCA/BAI and DAR to ensure sustainability of livelihoods of small-scale coconut farmers • Coconut Technical working group being established (PCA-lead and FAO co-lead). • Partners scaling up intercropping and livelihood diversification activities

  9. SRP -Outputs Data received so far

  10. Output Indicator 1.1.1 - # of individuals receiving food assistance (through general food distribution) Partner(s): WFP, CARE, PIN, FH

  11. Output Indicator 1.1.2 -#of persons receiving continued food assistance Partner(s): FH

  12. Indicator 1.1.3 - # of persons reached with cash transfers Partner(s): SI, CRS, FH, LWR

  13. Output Indicator 3.2.1 - #of affected farmers receiving agricultural inputs Partner(s): FAO, PIN, FH, E_W Seed

  14. Output Indicator 3.2.2 - # of affected farmers with key agricultural assets Partner(s): FH

  15. Output Indicator 3.2.4 - # of fisherfolk with boats repaired and built Partner(s): BFAR

  16. Indicator 3.2.5 - # of Barangays with agriculture support infrastructures repaired Partner(s): CRS

  17. Indicator 3.2.6 -# of women trained in food preservation OR fish processing OR seaweed farming Partner(s): E_W Seed

  18. Cross cutting issues Request for inputs

  19. How gender, age, disability, protection and AAP were taken forward in the response by FSAC partners? Sex and Age Disaggregated Data collection • Could your organization collect SADD? • If yes, at what level SADD was collected and reported – beneficiary registration, reporting and monitoring and cluster 3Ws • If no, what were the challenges you faced in collecting SADD? Assessments • Did your assessments capture the needs across gender, age, disability and diversity; and protection (including Do No Harm)? • If yes, can you share those findings and also explain how did findings influence your programming? • If no, what were the challenges in reflecting these aspects in your assessments?

  20. Programming to address specific needs • What steps/good practices you took to address the specific needs of affected populations especially during the delivery of assistance? • How were the specific needs of people addressed in cash for work? Were any preventive measures taken for protection? Did these projects design the activities suitable for people of different ages, genders and physical abilities? Feedback and complaint mechanisms • Could your agency address any of these? If yes, how and can you provide examples. If no, what were the challenges? • Humanitarian accountability including appropriate feedback mechanisms and following up on the feedback from the affected populations • Protection from harm and exclusion, • Dignified and meaningful engagement with men and women of all ages and various diversities; and especially those who remain unreachable in the communities due to lack of access, communication/knowledge gaps.

More Related