slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel Cycle The Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel Cycle The Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel Cycle The Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 473 Views
  • Uploaded on

Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel Cycle The Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan Taro HOKUGO March 23, 2006 This presentation includes his personal views and does not necessarily reflect the policy of Japan The Resources of Electricity Generation in Japan

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel Cycle The Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan' - arleen


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Civil Use of Nuclear Energy with Nuclear Fuel CycleThe Challenge for the Sustainable use of Nuclear Energy in Japan

Taro HOKUGO

March 23, 2006

This presentation includes his personal views and does not necessarily reflect the policy of Japan

slide2

The Resources of Electricity Generation in Japan

New Energy resources

0.5%

geothermal

0.4%

Nuclear

25.7%

Natural Gas

27.9%

Total Production of

Electricity

935.5 billion kWh

fossil fuels

Hydraulic

10.4%

Coal

24.0%

Oil

11.2%

Result in fiscal year 2003

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

From: http://www.atom.meti.go.jp/index.html

slide3

Over View of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan (1)

-State of Nuclear Power Generation-

・53 power plants are in operation (June, 2006,Ministry of Economy Trade, and Industry (METI))

・Capacity of Nuclear Power generation is 47,000MW (id.)

・The government published its policy either to maintain current rate of the dependency on nuclear power in electricity production, 30 – 40 %, or to increase it. (Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy, October 11, 2005, Japan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC))

・The government recognizes that nuclear power generation can contribute to the stable supply of Energy and the prevention of global warming (Id.)

slide4

Over View of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan (2)

-Nonproliferation-

・Japan is a member of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a “non-nuclear-weapon state”, so that its nuclear energy use is limited to peaceful purposes and under the full scope safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA).

・In addition, Japan accepts some restrictions of bilateral atomic energy agreement with some countries which offer nuclear fuels, initial technologies, some services.

・As a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), regulating its export of the devices which could be the key to nuclear technology in consistent with the London Guideline II (http://www.nuclearsuppliersgroup.org/)

slide5

Over View of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan (3)

-The Level of Technology-

・Although the experimental power plant was developed by Japan, all of current operating plants are either BWR or PWR, whose basic designs were those by GE or WH.

・However, some companies such as Toshiba (BWR), Hitachi (BWR) and Mitsubishi (PWR) has substantial technologies to construct civil nuclear power plants by them selves.

・National own technologies for enrichment and reprocessing

・Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) is doing research and development of nuclear technologies, including reprocessing, Fast Breading Reactor (FBR) and nuclear fusion energy.

slide6

The Fundamentals for Civil Nuclear Energy (1)

・The confidenceof international community

- Compliance of the obligations ofNPT

- Restrictions from Atomic Energy Agreements

Ex: Requirement of the approval by supplying

countries

- Informal substantial control of NSG

Core devices and technologies are under its control

- International Politics

Although NPT itself ordains the “inalienable right” to

“develop research, production anduse of nuclear

energy for peaceful purposes” (article IV), the reality of

the world politics has never admitted world distrusted

countries to engage in these activities

slide7

The Fundamentals for Civil Nuclear Energy (2)

・The Basic Legal Structure

- Nuclear Safety Regulation System

Requirement from the Nuclear Safety Treaty

Ex: Regulatory agency functionally separated from the

implementing agency of nuclear energy use

Regulation on each step of decision of the place of the

cite, design of the plant, the construction, and the

operation

- Nuclear Liability Law in which liability for the accident is

channeled to the operators

The establishment and equipment suppliers can not

engaged in the construction and maintenances without

such indemnification.

The practical remedy in the case of accidents

slide8

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Policy

Japan is implementing nuclear fuel cycle program, in which the spent nuclear fuel should be reprocessed and divided into nuclear fuel materials (uranium and plutonium ) and fission products, which should be disposed of as the high level nuclear waste. (Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy, October 11, 2005, JAEC)

The reserve-production ratio for the known amount of deposits of uranium is only about 85 (years) (OECD /NEA-IAEA “URANIUM2003”) , but if we use implement nuclear fuel cycle using FBR, it would rise up to 2,550 (id.).

slide9

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Intended in Japan

ores

yellow cake

uranium hexafluoride

Uranium mine

Refining plant

Conversion

uranium hexafluoride

HLW

Cool down Facility

Reprocessing

Enrichment

Burial facility

Spent fuel

plutonium

Temporary storage facilities

Reconversion

Power plant

low-level radioactive

waste (LLW)

uranium dioxide

fuel bundle

Burial facility

Pellet factory

From the website of METI (http://www.atom.meti.go.jp)

slide10

Reprocessing Factory of JNFL

Processing Capacity per Year: 800t

Max Processing Capacity per Day: 4.8tU

Max Capacity of SF Storage: 3,000tU

Ground Area: 3800,000 m2

Village of Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture

From the website of JNFL (http://www.JNFL.co.jp)

slide11

Light Water Reactor (LWR)

Slowdown

Neutron

Uranium 235

Energy

Uranium 235

Energy

Plutonium 239

Uranium 238

Fast Breeder Reactors (FBR)

Uranium 238

Plutonium 239

Plutonium 239

Plutonium 239

Energy

Energy

From the website of METI (http://www.atom.meti.go.jp)

slide12

Japanese FBR: MONJU

Thermal power: 714MW

Electric power: 270MW

From the website of JAEA (http://www.jaea.go.jp)

slide13

Frameworks Related with Nuclear Fuel Cycle (1)

・Reprocessing by a private enterprise:

Japan Nuclear Fuel limited (JNFL)

・Safety Regulations on Reprocessing Plant

Provisions for Reprocessing – The Nuclear Reactor

Regulation Act

・Strict Inspection of Safeguards

Strict requirement from the non-proliferation concern in

NPT and some additional agreements with IAEA

・Account Reserve for Future Reprocessing Cost

The cost of reprocessing arises after 5-10 years after the

use of the fuel. To make such lag time consistent with the

market system, electricity companies are required

allocate the predicted cost in the reserve at the time of

operation using the fuel.

slide14

Frameworks Related with Nuclear Fuel Cycle (2)

・Reserve Fund for the Disposal of HLW

The Act for the Disposal of HLW (May, 2000) established

the reserve fund for this purpose which is controlled out

side the electricity companies. Each electricity company

has to pay to this fund depending on the volume of the

use of the fuel.

・Process to get the Local Consent

・Government Invested R & D

Reprocessing, FBR, Disposal of HLW, Enrichment, etc.

slide15

The Controversial Issues (1)

・International Concern: non-proliferation

Plutonium could be a material for nuclear weapons.

Reprocessing is always suspected from international

community. In addition to the inspection of IAEA, the plant

of JNFL is designed to produce mixture of plutonium and

uranium, not pure plutonium.

・Safety Concern

Reprocessing is a kind of chemical factory, which is likely

to have leaking. But in this case, leaked liquid would be

radio active.

Current FBR, Monju, uses liquid sodium as refrigerant.

It caused leaking of sodium in Dec 1995, and it caused

suspect on the safety of FBR among public.

slide16

The Controversial Issues (2)

・Economical Efficiency (1)

The economical efficiency of nuclear power is considered to be “by no means inferior to other resources of electricity” (The report on Jan 23, 2005, the Subcommittee on the Cost Analysis, Electricity Utility Industry Council, METI)

On the other hand, lag time and lead time of some parts of the cost, uncertainty of the back end solution, and the relatively high initial investment cost for the facilities were concerned in the deregulation on the electricity industry in the amendment of the Electric Utility Law in 2003. (Ex: the report on Feb.15, 2003, Electricity Utility Industry Council, METI)

slide17

The Controversial Issues (3)

・Economical Efficiency (2)

When the government decided “Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy” (October 11, 2005, JAEC), the different of the cost between two options, Direct Disposal Option to dispose directly the spent fuel without reprocessing, and Nuclear Cycle Option to have reprocessing the spent fuel and dispose of the HLW which dose not include uranium or plutonium.

The conclusion was that the cycle option would be more expensive than the direct option by 10 %, reserving some possibility of change of cost depending on the cost of the policy change. (Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy, October 11, 2005, JAEC)

slide18

Efforts to Solve the Issues under Controversy

(1)

・Non-proliferation

The compliance of international obligations

The reputation as constitutionally peaceful country

・Safety Concern

Since it includes some new technologies, R & D and the accumulated experience of operation, in addition to strict enforcement of regulations, would be important.

Furthermore, without getting public understanding about the issue, the projects would not be forwarded, in the circumstance where the local consent is substantially necessary to do it.

slide19

Efforts to Solve the Issues under Controversy

(2)

・Economical Efficiency of Nuclear Power in General

It has been increased by the growth of size, and improvement of operations. The problem of lead time and lag time of the cost is mostly solved by the accounting system provided by law, so far, although it was an issue in the Deregulation of the industry.

Focus of economic efficiency is now mostly on the cost of nuclear fuel cycle.

・ Economical Efficiency of Nuclear Fuel Cycle

At this point, it depends on how properly the reprocessing factory woks. And as for future FBR, no one can tell the economical efficiency now.

slide20

Conclusion

Nuclear fuel cycle would be a sustainable use of Nuclear Energy, if successful.

On the other hand, there is still strong skepticism on the perspective of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Policy. In addition, it is also a non-proliferation issue.

However, the factors affecting the perspective are the matter of human endeavor, not physical limitations. And they have been solved to some extent.

Thus, I think that Nuclear Energy with fuel cycle would be a “good energy” for Japan, as long as it is the country that is trusted to have the peaceful nature, and that has the ability and the eagerness to continue R & D to solve arisen problems.