Strategy implementation
Download
1 / 36

Strategy Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 356 Views
  • Updated On :

Strategy Implementation. HCAD 5390. Organizational Structure. Organizational design Selecting the structure and control systems that are most strategically effective for pursuing sustainable competitive advantage. The role of structure and control To coordinate strategy implementation.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Strategy Implementation' - arien


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Organizational structure l.jpg
Organizational Structure

  • Organizational design

    • Selecting the structure and control systems that are most strategically effective for pursuing sustainable competitive advantage.

  • The role of structure and control

    • To coordinate strategy implementation.

    • To motivate and provide incentives for superior performance.


The role of organizational structure l.jpg
The Role of Organizational Structure

  • Building blocks of organizational structure

    • Differentiation in the allocation of people and resources to create value.

      • Vertical differentiation in the distribution of decision-making authority.

      • Horizontal differentiation in dividing up people and tasks into functions and divisions.

    • Integration

      • The means used in coordinating people and functions to accomplish organizational tasks.


Differentiation integration bureaucratic costs l.jpg
Differentiation, Integration, Bureaucratic Costs

  • Bureaucratic costs and strategy implementation:

    • Bureaucratic costs increase with organizational complexity.

    • More differentiation = more managers.

    • More integration = more coordination.

    • Better strategy implementation = better bottom-line performance and profitability.


Vertical differentiation l.jpg
Vertical Differentiation

  • Span of control (division of authority)

    • The number of subordinates that a single manager directly manages.

  • Organizational hierarchy choices

    • Flat structures

      • Few organizational levels

      • Wide spans of control

    • Tall structures

      • Many organizational levels

      • Narrow spans of control



Problems with tall structures l.jpg
Problems with Tall Structures

  • Principle of minimum chain of command

    • Maintaining a hierarchy with the least number of levels of authority needed to achieve a strategy.

  • Sources of bureaucratic costs:


Centralization or decentralization l.jpg
Centralization or Decentralization

  • Authority patterns in organizations:

    • Centralized

      • Decision making retained in the hands of upper-level managers.

    • Decentralized

      • Decisions delegated to lower levels in the organization.


Centralization structural choice l.jpg

Advantages of decentralization

Reduced information overload on upper managers.

Increased motivation and accountability throughout organization.

Fewer managers; lower bureaucratic costs.

Advantages of centralization

Easier coordination of organizational activities.

Decisions fitted to broad organizational objectives.

Exercise of strong leadership in crisis.

Faster decision making and response.

Centralization (Structural) Choice?


Horizontal differentiation l.jpg
Horizontal Differentiation

  • Focus is on division and grouping of tasks to meet business objectives.

  • Simple structure:

    • Characteristic of small entrepreneurial companies.

    • Entrepreneur takes on most managerial roles.

    • No formal organization arrangements.

    • Horizontal differentiation is low.


Slide11 l.jpg


Slide12 l.jpg

  • Structure Follows Strategy:

    • New strategy is created

    • New administrative problems emerge

    • Economic performance declines

    • New appropriate structure is invented

    • Profit returns to its previous levels


Slide13 l.jpg


Slide14 l.jpg

  • Simple Structure:

    • Stage I:

      • Entrepreneur

        • Decision making tightly controlled

        • Little formal structure

        • Planning short range/reactive

        • Flexible and dynamic


Slide15 l.jpg

  • Functional Structure:

    • Stage II:

      • Management team

      • Functional specialization

      • Delegation decision making

      • Concentration/specialization in industry


Slide16 l.jpg

  • Divisional Structure:

    • Stage III:

      • Diverse product lines

      • Decentralized decision making

      • SBU’s

      • Almost unlimited resources


Slide17 l.jpg

  • Beyond SBU’s:

    • Stage IV:

      • Increasing environmental uncertainty

      • Technological advances

      • Size & scope of worldwide businesses

      • Multi-industry competitive strategy

      • Better educated personnel


Functional structure l.jpg

Advantages

Task grouping facilitates specialization and productivity.

Better monitoring of work processes, reduced costs.

Greater control over organizational activities.

Disadvantages

Functional orientation creates communication problems.

Performance and profitability measurement problems.

Location versus function problems (coordination).

Strategic problems due to structural (vertical and horizontal) mismatches.

Functional Structure



Mutlitdivisional structure l.jpg

Advantages

Enhanced corporate control by division

Enhanced strategic control of each SBU in portfolio

Growth is easier. New units don’t have to be integrated across organization

Stronger pursuit of internal efficiencies. Performance of individual units is readily measurable.

Disadvantages

Establishing the divisional-corporate authority relationship

Distortion of information by divisions

Competition for resources by divisions

Transfer pricing problems between divisions

Short-term research and development focus

Bureaucratic costs

Mutlitdivisional Structure



Matrix structure l.jpg
Matrix Structure

  • Advantages

    • Flexibility of the structure and membership

    • Minimum of direct hierarchical control

    • Maximizes use of employees’ skills

    • Motivates employees; frees up top management

  • Disadvantages

    • High bureaucratic costs

    • High costs (time and money) for building relationships

    • Two-boss employee’s role conflict


Matrix structure23 l.jpg

Two-boss employee

Matrix Structure


Slide24 l.jpg

  • Network Structure:

    • “non structure” – elimination of in-house business functions

    • Termed “virtual organization”

      • Useful in unstable environments

      • Need for innovation and quick response


Slide25 l.jpg

Packagers

Designers

Suppliers

Corporate

Headquarters

(Broker)

Manufacturers

Distributors

Promotion/

Advertising

Agencies

Network Structure


Slide26 l.jpg


Slide27 l.jpg

  • Staffing follows strategy:

    • Matching the manager to the strategy

      • Executive type

        • Executives with a particular mix of skills and experiences


Slide28 l.jpg

  • Executive Types:

    • Dynamic industry expert

    • Analytical portfolio manager

    • Cautious profit planner

    • Turnaround specialist

    • Professional liquidator


Slide29 l.jpg

Matching Chief Executive “Types” with Strategy

Business Strength/Competitive Position

Strong

Average

Weak

Growth—Concentration

Dynamic Industry Expert

Retrenchment—Save Company

Turnaround Specialist

High

Stability

Cautious Profit Planner

Medium

Industry Attractiveness

Low

Growth—Diversification

Analytical Portfolio Manager

Retrenchment—Close Company

Professional Liquidator


Slide30 l.jpg

  • Managing corporate culture:

    • Corporate culture

      • Affects firm’s ability to shift its strategic direction

      • Strong tendency to resist change

      • Corporate culture should support the strategy


Slide31 l.jpg

  • Strategy-Culture Compatibility:

    • Consider the following:

      • Is the planned strategy compatible with the firm’s current culture?

      • Can the culture be easily modified to make it more compatible with new strategy?

      • Is management willing to make major organizational changes?

      • Is management committed to implementing the strategy?


Slide32 l.jpg

  • Managing corporate culture:

    • Communication

      • Key to effective management of change

      • Rationale for strategic change should be communicated to all


What is organizational culture l.jpg
What Is Organizational Culture?

  • Culture

    • The collection of values and norms shared by people and groups in an organization.

    • Shared values and a common culture increase integration and improve coordination.

  • Values

    • Beliefs and ideas about common goals and proper behaviors.

  • Norms

    • Act as guidelines or expectations that prescribe acceptable behavior by organizational members.


Organizational culture l.jpg
Organizational Culture

  • Ways of transmitting organizational culture:


Culture and strategic leadership l.jpg
Culture and Strategic Leadership

  • The influence of the founder

    • Initial cultural values and management style is imprinted on the organization by its founder.

  • Organizational structure

    • Structure follows strategy. Strategic leadership affects the cultural norms and values that develop in the organization.


Strategic reward systems l.jpg
Strategic Reward Systems

  • Individual reward systems

    • Piecework plans

    • Commission systems

    • Bonus plans

    • Promotion

  • Group and organizational reward systems

    • Group-based bonus systems

    • Profit sharing systems

    • Employee stock option systems

    • Organization bonus systems