1 / 14

Project Management Review: Implementing Consistency and Enhancing Presentation Quality

Reviewer feedback on project dry run responses include the need for a project manager, labor and contingency planning, consistency in apparatus use, and avoiding cartoons. Suggestions for timing rehearsals, official picture files, and magnet design. Key topics like Cerenkov optimization, Shashlyk enhancements, polarimetry involvement, GEM tracking, and hardware timing issues are discussed in detail with reviewer critiques and suggestions by Kees, Steve Wood, Eugene, Cardman, Mack, and Pavel. Recommendations for addressing systematic errors, calibration, and rate dependence are highlighted.

ardara
Download Presentation

Project Management Review: Implementing Consistency and Enhancing Presentation Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reviewer’s Comments From the dry run

  2. Responses from • Kees • Steve Wood • Eugene • Cardman • Mack • Kistenev • Pavel

  3. General • Budget Comments • Need project manager • Include labor and contingency • Consistency • Everyone use the same apparatus (We are headed that way) Cartoons didn’t go over well. • Timing of talks: Need rehearsal for review

  4. Helpful figure

  5. Not Helpful Where’s their Sense of humor???

  6. How to Proceed • Need (ppt?) file of all official pictures that may appear in more than one talk. • File gets frozen before rehearsal. • All talks use the same pictures.

  7. Magnet • Even with coil, it is expensive. • There are serious engineering issues. • Therefore, detailed design and cost estimate must be a high priority. • See magnet talks.

  8. Cerenkov • Many interesting ideas for optimizing PMT’s • Need background rates to compare with dark current. • Need prototyping • Super-Bialkali cathode, UV Glass??

  9. Shashlyk • New Pre-Rad options? • Improve pion rejection? • Readout options? • Concern about clear fibers.

  10. Polarimetry • Does it belong? YES (Major PVDIS systematic) • Eugene endorsed our errors.

  11. GEM’s, Tracking, and Simulations • Reviewers list and our list are similar.

  12. Hardware Timing Issues • Each detector has different timing properties. • How are these time constants handled in the DAQ with its own time constants (Filters??). • Can timing be used to reduce backgrounds? (Exploiting the pulsed beams structure?) • What gate widths do we use to estimate accidentals?

  13. Pavel’s Suggestions • Does PVDIS need cooling? • Activation? • Radiation Monitors Had many ideas that I hadn’t thought of.

  14. Little Discussion of Systematic Errors • Calibrations • Rate dependence Where do these topic belong? Separate presentation?

More Related