slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 10

System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on

System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs. Satoru Hori, Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata, Masahiro Morikura NTT [email protected] Approach to 100 Mbps WLAN. PHY Layer Requirements for Next Generation WLAN - Data rate above 100 Mbps - Enough cell radius

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs' - anila


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs

Satoru Hori, Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata, Masahiro Morikura

NTT

[email protected]

slide2
Approach to 100 Mbps WLAN

PHY Layer Requirements for Next Generation WLAN

- Data rate above 100 Mbps

- Enough cell radius

- Large system capacity

Comparison between several candidates

- Extension of IEEE 802.11a

- Data rate of 108 Mbit/s (twice as 54 Mbit/s in IEEE 802.11a)

slide3
Four candidates extending IEEE 802.11 a

A: double clock rate

clock rate of the system is twice as fast as that of IEEE 802.11 a

e.g. clock rate: 20 MHz 40 MHz

B: double sub-carrier numbers

number of sub-carriers is twice as many as that of IEEE 802.11 a

e.g. 52 sub-carriers 104 sub-carriers

C: 4096 QAM-OFDM

increasing the number of bits in M-ary QAM on each sub-carrier

e.g. 64 QAM 4096 QAM

D: OFDM/SDM (multi-carrier MIMO) system

using multiple transmit and receive antennas

each antenna transmit different data to increase transmit data rate

e.g. 2 transmit antennas and 2 receive antennas

Reference

A. van Zelst, R. van Nee, and G. A. Awater, “Space Division Multiplexing (SDM) for OFDM systems,” Proc. IEEE VTC2000-spring, vol. 2, pp.1070-1074, May 2000.

P.Vandenameele, L. V. D.Perre, M. G. E.engels, B. Gyselinckx, and H. J. D. Man, “A Combined OFDM/SDMA Approach,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, Nov. 2000.

slide4
Parameters of each system

A: double

clock rate

B: double

sub-carriers

C: 4096 QAM-

OFDM

D: OFDM/

SDM

Data rate

108 Mbit/s

108 Mbit/s

108 Mbit/s

108 Mbit/s

Band width

33.1 MHz

33.1 MHz

16.6 MHz

16.6 MHz

6 channels

(USA)

6 channels

(USA)

12 channels

(USA)

12 channels

(USA)

Number of

channels

52

104

52

52

Number of

sub-carriers

2 ms

symbol length

4 ms

4 ms

4 ms

GI length

400 ns

800 ns

800 ns

800 ns

Mod. scheme

64 QAM

64 QAM

4096 QAM

64 QAM

receiver : 2

(diversity)

receiver : 2

(diversity)

transmitter : 2

receiver : 2

Number of

antennas

receiver : 2

(diversity)

slide5
Cell Radius Calculation

d = (l / 4p) 10(Lp /10 a) [m]

Lp = Pt + Gt + Gr - Pr [dB]

Pr = Np + Cr + Df [dBm]

Np = Nf + 10log10(kBwT) + 30 [dBm]

d : cell radius

l : wave length ( = c/f = 0.0576923 [m] for 5.2GHz )

a : propagation loss coefficient

Lp : allowed propagation loss

Pt , Pr : transmit power and required received power, respectively

Gt, Gr : the gain of transmit antenna and receive antenna, respectively

(was assumed to be 0 dBi)

Np : noise power

Nf : noise figure of the receiver (was assumed to be 7 dB)

Df : degradation due to various factors (was assumed to be 6 dB)

Bw : bandwidth of signals

T : temperature (was assumed to be 300 K)

k : Boltzman coefficient (= 1.38 * 10-23 [J/K] )

Cr : required CNR to realize PER of 1%

slide6
Cell space

Interference area

System Capacity Calculation

Th=(R * h * Nch)/C=3sqrt(3) * Nch * R * h/(2p * 102CIR/10a)

Th : Maximum throughput

R : data rate of PHY layer ( = 108 Mbit/s)

h : MAC efficiency for throughput (was assumed to be 1.0)

Nch : Number of channels ( = 12 for 20MHz band width and

6 for 40MHz band width ) (Lower, Middle and Upper UNII bands)

C : Cluster size ( = Interference area / Cell space )

CIR : Required CIR to achieve PER of 1%

slide7
0

10

B:double sub-carriers

C: 4096 QAM-OFDM

-1

10

D: OFDM/SDM

PER

-2

10

A:double clock rate

-3

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

CNR [dB]

Required CNR

Data rate 108 Mbit/s

Packet size 64 byte

Exponentially decaying

Rayleigh fading

(delay spread 100 ns)

No space correlation

Ideal synchronization

Ideal channel estimation

FEC

coding rate = 3/4

constraint length = 7

5 bit soft-decision

diversity (A, B, C)

Maximum ratio combining

slide8
0

10

A:double clock rate

C: 4096 QAM-OFDM

-1

10

PER

-2

10

D: OFDM/SDM

B:double sub-carriers

-3

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

CIR [dB]

Required CIR

Data rate 108 Mbit/s

Packet size 64 byte

Exponentially decaying

Rayleigh fading

(delay spread 100 ns)

No space correlation

Ideal synchronization

Ideal channel estimation

FEC

coding rate = 3/4

constraint length = 7

5 bit soft-decision

diversity (A, B, C)

Maximum ratio combining

slide9
Performance Comparison

A: double

clock rate

B: double

sub-carriers

C: 4096 QAM-

OFDM

D: OFDM /

SDM

Required CNR

19.5 dB

18.8 dB

36.1 dB

29.2 dB

Transmit

power

13 dBm

13 dBm

13 dBm

13 dBm

Propagation loss

coefficient a

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

11.4 m

12.0 m

4.1 m

6.9 m

Cell radius

Required CIR

20.3 dB

20.0 dB

37.2 dB

29.8 dB

Cluster size

24.7

23.6

303.7

101.2

System capacity

26.4 Mbit/s

27.6 Mbit/s

4.2 Mbit/s

12.9 Mbit/s

slide10
Conclusion

Systems with 40 MHz band width (A and B)

- CNR and CIR are pragmatic.

- Total number of channels is one half of that of

IEEE 802.11 a.

e.g. 6 channels in USA, only 2 channels in Japan

Systems with 20 MHz band width (C and D)

- Total number of channels is same as that of IEEE

802.11 a.

- CNR and CIR must be improved significantly.

ad