250 likes | 424 Views
E N D
1. Les Normes IFRS seront-elles un jour le référentiel comptable mondial? Colloque CSOEC-INTEC 26/11/2010
2. 2
3. FONDATION IFRSMission et gouvernancewww.ifrs.org
4. 4 Une citation pour commencer..
5. 5 Who we are and what we do The IFRS Foundation and the International Accounting Standards Board
Our objective
To develop a single set of high quality, understandable, enforceable and globally accepted financial reporting standards based upon clearly articulated principles.
How do we do this?
An independent standard-setting board, overseen by a geographically
and professionally diverse body of trustees, publicly accountable to a Monitoring Board of public capital market authorities
Supported by an external IFRS Advisory Council and an IFRS Interpretations Committee to offer guidance where divergence in practice occurs
A thorough, open, participatory and transparent due process
Engagement with investors, regulators, business leaders and the
global accountancy profession at every stage of the process
Collaborative efforts with the worldwide standard-setting community
6. 6
7. 7 The Monitoring Board
Trustees’ meeting in New Delhi, January 2009: decision to enhance the organisation’s public accountability by establishing a link to a Monitoring Board of public authorities.
Members of the Monitoring Board are, at this moment: the Emerging Markets and Technical Committees of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the European Commission, the Financial Services Agency of Japan (JFSA), and US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision participates in the Monitoring Board as an observer.
Through the Monitoring Board, securities regulators that allow or require the use of IFRS in their jurisdictions will be able to more effectively carry out their mandates regarding investor protection, market integrity, and capital formation.
Monitoring Board’s main responsibilities: to ensure that the Trustees continue to discharge their duties as defined by the IFRS Foundation Constitution, as well as approving the appointment or reappointment of Trustees. For more information on the Monitoring Board, including details of members, meeting dates, press releases and contacts, please see the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) website.
8. 8 Les membres de l’IASB au 1er Octobre Members are appointed by the Trustees. Following a decision at the January 2009 Trustees meeting, the IASB will be expanded to 16 members by 2012 with a required balance of geographic origins and professional backgrounds.
Sir David Tweedie *(UK)
Stephen Cooper (UK)
Philippe Danjou *(F)
Jan Engström (Sw)
Patrick Finnegan (US)
Amaro Luiz de Oliveira Gomes (Br)
Prabhakar Kalavacherla (‘PK’) (India)
Dr Elke König (D)
Patricia McConnell (US)
Warren McGregor*(Aus)
Paul Pacter (US)
Darrel Scott (RSA)
John Smith (US)
Tatsumi Yamada *(Jap)
Zhang Wei-Guo (China)
Hans Hoogervorst et Ian MacIntosh nommés à effet du 01/07/2011
2 recrutements en cours (mais un membre rééligible)
(*) Mandat expire le 30 Juin 2011
9. Retour sur 2001-2010
10. 10 Resolution du Comite Technique IOSCO de Mai 2000 In order to respond to the significant growth in cross-border capital flows, IOSCO has sought to facilitate cross-border offerings and listings. IOSCO believes that cross-border offerings and listings would be facilitated by high quality, internationally accepted accounting standards that could be used by incoming multinational issuers in cross-border offerings and listings. Therefore, IOSCO has worked with the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) as it sought to develop a reasonably complete set of accounting standards through the IASC core standards work program.
IOSCO has assessed 30 IASC standards, including their related interpretations (“the IASC 2000 standards”), considering their suitability for use in cross-border offerings and listings. IOSCO has identified outstanding substantive issues relating to the IASC 2000 standards in a report that includes an analysis of those issues and specifies supplemental treatments that may be required in a particular jurisdiction to address each of these concerns.
The Presidents’ Committee congratulates the IASC for its hard work and contribution to raising the quality of financial reporting worldwide. The IASC’s work to date has succeeded in effecting significant improvements in the quality of the IASC standards. Accordingly, the Presidents’ Committee recommends that IOSCO members permit incoming multinational issuers to use the 30 IASC 2000 standards to prepare their financial statements for cross-border offerings and listings, as supplemented in the manner described below (the “supplemental treatments”) where necessary to address outstanding substantive issues at a national or regional level.
IOSCO notes that a body of accounting standards like the IASC standards must continue to evolve in order to address existing and emerging issues. IOSCO’s recommendation assumes that IOSCO will continue to be involved in the IASC work and structure and that the IASC will continue to develop its body of standards. IOSCO strongly urges the IASC in its future work program to address the concerns identified in the Assessment Report, in particular, future projects.
11. 11 Retour sur 2001-2010: une dynamique de succès (1973-2000: Travail fondateur de l’IASC et cooperation avec IOSCO)
2001 : création de l’IFRS Foundation a l’initiative de l’UE+SEC+IOSCO; premier IAS Board nommé; programme initial de 9 sujets a traiter; création IFRIC et SAC
2002 : Réglement Européen IFRS (>2005); FASB et IASB annoncent une initiative de convergence des normes et de coopération; annonce d’un programme technique plus complet aprés consultation du SAC et des régulateurs boursiers; scandales comptables (Enron etc) aux USA
2003 : publication IFRS1; Australie, HK, NZ, RSA adoptent IFRS
2004: plate-forme stable de nouveaux standards; accord de coopération avec normalisateur comptable japonais; publication d’IFRS 2 (Share-based payments) qui servira de base à la norme US SFAS 123; IFRS 4 (Insurance Contracts)
12. 12 Retour sur 2001-2010: une dynamique de succés 2005: transition aux IFRS en Europe; SEC publie une “roadmap” décrivant les étapes pour aboutir à une adoption des IFRS aux USA
2006: FASB et IASB signent un “Memorandum of Understanding” pour faire progresser la convergence; la Chine adopte de nouvelles normes substantiellement alignées sur les IFRS
2007: Brésil, Canada, Chili, Inde, Japon et Corée publient des calendriers d’adoption ou de convergence avec les IFRS
13. 13 Retour sur 2001-2010: une dynamique de succés 2007: La SEC autorise les émetteurs étrangers à accéder au marché financier US avec des comptes établis en IFRS sans reconciliation US GAAP, et lance une consultation sur l’adoption des IFRS aux USA
2008 : Israel, Malaisie et Mexique adoptent IFRS; l’IASB adapte son programme de travail en réponse à la crise financière et devient un membre du Financial Stability Board; première nouvelle norme commune IASB-FASB (>IFRS 3R)
2009 : Publication des “IFRS pour les PME”
14. 14 Retour sur 2001-2010: une dynamique de succés Communiqué du G20 Pittsburgh (26 Septembre 2009)
“We call on our international accounting bodies to redouble their efforts to achieve a single set of high quality, global accounting standards within the context of their independent standard setting process, and complete their convergence project by June 2011. The International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) institutional framework should further enhance the involvement of various stakeholders”
15. 15 Retour sur 2001-2010: une dynamique de succés 2009 : L’IASB conclut la première phase de son programme de travail en réponse a la crise financière (IFRS 9); le Japon publie un calendrier pour l’adoption des IFRS et autorise certaines sociétés japonaises à reporter en IFRS; accélération des travaux de convergence avec le FASB en réponse a la demande des leaders du G20 (nouveau MoU, joint meetings, progress reports)
2010: la SEC publie un “statement’ réaffirmant son soutien aux IFRS et confirmant son plan à long terme d’adoption aux USA
16. 16
17. 17 Country Status for listed companies as of April 2010 Argentina Required for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2011
Australia Required for all private sector reporting entities and as the basis for public sector reporting since 2005
Brazil Required for consolidated financial statements of banks and listed companies from 31 December 2010 and for individual company accounts progressively since January 2008
Canada Required from 1 January 2011 for all listed entities and permitted for private sector entities including not-for-profit organisations
China Substantially converged national standards
European Union All member states of the EU are required to use IFRSs as adopted by the EU for listed companies since 2005
India India is converging with IFRSs over a period beginning 1 April 2011
Indonesia Convergence process ongoing; a decision about a target date for full compliance with IFRSs is expected to be made in 2012
Japan Permitted from 2010 for a number of international companies; decision about mandatory adoption by 2016 expected around 2012
Mexico Required from 2012
Republic of Korea Required from 2011
Russia Required for banking institutions and some other securities issuers; permitted for other companies
Saudi Arabia Not permitted for listed companies
South Africa Required for listed entities since 2005
Turkey Required for listed entities since 2008
United States Allowed for foreign issuers in the US since 2007; target date for substantial convergence with IFRSs is 2011 and decision about possible adoption for US companies expected in 2011.
18. 18 Modified joint strategy and work plan (October 2010) Prioritise major projects to permit sharper focus on those areas in most urgent need for improvement in both IFRS and US GAAP
Phasing of publication of EDs and related consultations to enable broad-based, effective stakeholder participation
Publication of separate consultation document seeking stakeholder input about effective dates and transition methods (Request for views; 19/10/2010)
19. 19 The major joint projects Financial Crisis (MoU)
Financial instruments
Fair value measurement
Consolidation
Derecognition
20. 20 The major projects
21. 21 The major projects
22. 22
23. DIFFICULTES A SURMONTER
24. 24 Nos principaux challenges pour 2011 et après “Réconciliation” avec l’Union Europeenne et adoption de la norme IFRS 9
Achever de clarifier le role de la comptabilité dans la stabilité financière
Gérer une nouvelle plate-forme normative stabilisée
Revue post-implementation de plusieurs standards
Participation plus active des investisseurs
Convaincre les dirigeants d’entreprise
Convergence ou adoption des IFRS?
2011= fin du calendrier de convergence…la SEC décidera-t’elle
d’adopter les IFRS aux USA?
Impact de la décision de la SEC sur d’autres juridictions?
Consultation publique par l’IASB sur le work program post 2011
Trustees and Monitoring Board: Strategic Reviews
25. 25
26. 26