1 / 20

By Dr. Abel Léon Kalambay General Secretary for Environment / 1 DRC

Theme 6: Enhancing GEF coordination, consultation, and outreach activities in DRC. Subregional GEF Workshop for West and Central African Countries in Dakar, Senegal, 21-23 May 2007). By Dr. Abel Léon Kalambay General Secretary for Environment / 1 DRC. Contents. Background Key Actors

amory
Download Presentation

By Dr. Abel Léon Kalambay General Secretary for Environment / 1 DRC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theme 6: Enhancing GEF coordination, consultation, and outreach activities in DRC Subregional GEF Workshop for West and Central African Countries in Dakar, Senegal, 21-23 May 2007) By Dr. Abel Léon Kalambay General Secretary for Environment /1 DRC

  2. Contents • Background • Key Actors • Main Accomplishments • Constraints encountered • Lessons learnt • Conclusion & Recommendations

  3. Background • DRC ratification of the three Rio conventions: • 15/11/1994: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) • 08/12/1994: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), • 11/09/1997: UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). • 1994: Creation of an Inter-ministerial Committee in charge of coordination and follow-up of Rio decisions • Elaboration of the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP), • Production of the National Monograph on Biodiversity, • Production of the report on the general status of the national environment, • Priority environmental actions (2006-2011).

  4. Background (cont'd) • 1997: Creation of a National Biodiversity Unit • Implementation of the Convention via the formulation of a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan • Meanwhile, preparation of the Initial National Communication on climate change by the Directorate of Human Settlements and elaboration of specific national reports on desertification by the Inter-ministerial Committee on Environment and Nature Conservation. • Wide variety of entities in charge, hence a scattering of efforts among those three organizations (Biodiversity Unit, Directorate of Human Settlements, Inter-ministerial Committee).

  5. Background (cont'd) • December 2001: Creation of a Directorate of Sustainable Development housing the three Rio Conventions’ Focal Points whose assigned tasks fall along the lines of the major GEF thematic areas. • Directorate of Sustainable Development: GEF Operational Focal Point.

  6. Key actors involved in the coordination of the Rio Conventions • Governmental coordination entity: Directorate of Sustainable Development, including the GEF OFP, the World Sustainable Development Commission FP and the three Rio Conventions FP’s • Its mandate: (1) Ensure NEAP monitoring; (2) Negotiate NEAP project and programme funding; (3) Ensure implementation of the Rio Conventions and regional commitments made by DRC.

  7. Key actors (cont'd) • Private sector : Federation of Congo Enterprises (FEC) and Federation of Wood Industries (FIB). • Both advisory role and participatory role as regards strategies to be developed.

  8. Key actors (cont'd) • Parastatals: • ICCN and IJZBC, dealing respectively with in situ and ex situ conservation of biological resources; • INERA, dealing with the development of sustainable production systems while taking into consideration current constraints and future stakes in connection with the three Conventions; • METTLSAT, dealing with collecting data and other information on climate and meteorology.

  9. Key actors (cont'd) • NGOs: partners in the implementation of the three Rio Conventions, in view of the guidance they provide targeting the general public. • Universities and research institutions: advisory role in the conduct of specific studies aimed at elaborating strategies to combat or prevent harmful environmental impacts.

  10. Results and Accomplishments • Harmonization and programming integration of the various national plans and strategies • Updating of the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) • Preparation of the First and Second National Communications on climate change • Updating of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan • Elaboration of the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change

  11. Results and Accomplishments (cont'd) • Additional enabling activities in the areas of biodiversity and climate change, • Elaboration of the document of the National Programme of Action (NPA) to Combat Desertification, • Elaboration of the National Biosafety Framework, • Preparation of the draft legislation on biotechnology safety

  12. Results and Accomplishments (cont'd) • National Capacity Self-Assessment (NCSA) Project: production of three thematic reports on capacity-building for the Rio Conventions, • Project for the rehabilitation of protected areas with the World Bank as IA • Project for the rehabilitation of protected areas with UNDP as IA.

  13. Constraints encountered • Complex procedures for project approval and extensive delays in obtaining funding • Difficulty understanding the “incremental cost” concept • Difficulties in connection with harmonization of policies for implementation of the Conventions and complex approval procedures of funding requests submitted to GEF • Insufficient funding levels

  14. Constraints encountered (cont'd) • Lack of national policies on access to resources for NGOs, grassroots organizations and private sector, in particular for MSPs and small-scale projects, • Documentation in English • Lack of implementation of National Action Plans (Biodiversity, Climate Change, Desertification, etc.).

  15. Constraints encountered (cont'd) • Non-acceptation by Implementing Agencies of project concepts and/or projects developed at national level • Insufficient documentary support to allow effective participation in the coordination process

  16. Solutions advocated • Streamlining of project approval procedures and accelerated provision of funding • Specific training on “incremental cost” concept • Capacity-building for harmonization of Rio Conventions implementation policies • Expedited response to funding requests submitted to GEF

  17. Solutions advocated (cont'd) • Definition of appropriate policies to enable civil society and the private sector to access medium-size and small-scale funding • Revision of the approval mechanism for project concepts or developed projects with priority granted to those formulated by national institutions

  18. Lessons learnt • The creation of a single coordination entity (Directorate of Sustainable Development) promoted synergies between the GEF OFP and the three Conventions FPs, in particular for the submission of ecosystem-level projects covering two or three focal areas in line with GEF objectives. • Establishment of the National GEF Committee in DRC by way of Decree no. 001 of 22 January 2007.

  19. Conclusion & Recommendations • Define priority needs for capacity-building (NCSA) • Establishment of a consultation framework (National GEF Committee) and a coordination framework (Directorate of Sustainable Development) • Development of a website at the coordination entity level.

  20. Thank you for your kind attention

More Related