1 / 22

Grundtvig learning partnership project

Grundtvig learning partnership project „ EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES OF OFFENDERS”. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.

amma
Download Presentation

Grundtvig learning partnership project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grundtvig learning partnership project „EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES OF OFFENDERS” This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

  2. MADRID(6-11 thMay 2013) MEETING EVALUATION

  3. Team Coordinator Assessment Number of participants: 6 Focus on 4 themes: 1) Communicationamong the partners 2) Activities 3) Mobilty 4) Involvement of local Community

  4. 1) Communications among the partners • All the coordinatorssharedinformations with partners • All the groupssharedinformations via e-mail • Group meetingswere made weeklyor close to the deadlines.

  5. 2) Activities The onlytwoactivitieswhichshould be improved are ‘’Study/Research’’ and ‘’On Field Work’’

  6. The main problems to cope with for the team. Maybe the onlyproblems for the team were ‘’Lack of time and human resources’’ and ‘’Financial problems’’

  7. 3) Mobility What grade of difficulty will your group face in order to accomplish the programmed mobility activities? Most of the groupsanswered the groupwouldhavehad no problems in facing the mobiltyactivities. ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL PROBLEMS THE GROUP COULD FACE:

  8. Problems in mobility Therewere no realproblems in mobility

  9. Preparatoryactivities for mobility

  10. 4) Involvement of local Community In this part of the questionnairethe focus was on the organizations of each country, involved in the making of thisproject.

  11. Commitment for eachinstitution

  12. The localgovernment and othersimilarorganizationswere the mostinvolved. In particulartheygavetheircontribution to the ‘’implementation of the activities’’ and to the ‘’organization of events’’.

  13. SatisfactionAssessment Number of participants: 15 • Itconcerned general informationsabout the meeting in Spain and the satisfactionabout some aspects of the meeting • Section 1: General informationsabout the meeting • Section 2: Satisfaction of participants

  14. 1) General informationsabout the meeting The first part of the questionnaireinvestigated the intensity of the activitiespresentedduring the meeting

  15. The highestintensitywas for ‘’Educational trips’’, ‘’Social/Cultural activities’’ and ‘’On desk study/Research’’ • Weshouldhaveimproved the intensity of ‘’Laboratoryactivities’’ and ‘’On field work’’

  16. 2) Satisfaction of Participants This part of the questionnairefocused on the satisfactionupon: • Project Coordinator • Meeting Coordinator • Team Leader

  17. The satisfaction, in this case, ispretty high for all the items, apart from the ‘’Involvement of the groups’’ and the ‘’Trasparency on aims’’

  18. Regarding the Madrid Meeting Coordinator, almostall the participantswerefullysatisfied with ‘’Logistics’’, ‘’Group Involvement’’, ‘’Key partnership relations development’ and‘’Materialsprovided’’

  19. The results of this schedule didn’t show anycriticpointsregarding the team leaders

  20. Summary Team Coordinator: • More Study/Research and on field work • Mainproblems for the group: Lack of time and human resources/ Financial problems To improve: • On field work • Involvement of the groups by developing open dialogue • Trasparency on aims

  21. Team coordinator: • Perfect comunicationsamong the partners • No realproblems for the group • No problems in mobility • Goodpreparation for mobility • High involvement of Local Government and Organizations Satisfaction: • Educational trips, Social/cultural activities, On desk study/research • Satisfactionwith the Project Coordinator • High Satisfaction with the Team Leaders • High Satisfaction with the Madrid Meeting Organization

  22. ThankyouMinistry of JusticePRAP Campania

More Related