330 likes | 564 Views
5 th Steering Group Meeting. 3 main discussion points:. Status Quo report. Status Quo report. Status Quo report. II. Work Plan. I. Communication & Dissemination:. III. Finance & Others. I. Communication & Dissemination. “ Ingrid Rozhon 25th Oct 2013 Toruń / PL. Newsletter 3.
E N D
5th Steering Group Meeting • 3 main discussion points: Status Quo report Status Quo report Status Quo report II. Work Plan I. Communication & Dissemination: III. Finance & Others
I.Communication & Dissemination “ Ingrid Rozhon 25th Oct 2013 Toruń / PL
Newsletter 3 • 3rd newsletterisavailable in EN & DE version • Content of 3rd newsletter • Pleasehelppromotingthe 3rd RECOMMEND newsletter (sending out only link tohomepage)
Newsletter 4 • Deadline: Beginning of December 2013 • Coordinator: LP (Ingrid) • Proposal for content of 4th Newsletter
Project image film • New idea– fordiscussion- nopoint in Applicationtofulfill • Proposal: image film centrope_tt • Why a projectimage film? • Whatcanbeachievedby a project film? • Target groups / Target events?
Project image film CONCEPT: • Target: image film on eco-management & eco-innovation & project RECOMMEND • Duration: 3-5 minutes • Content (tobediscussed) • General impressions on eco-Topic • Introductionby Lead Partner about RECOMMEND • Statement I on RECOMMEND Pilot Action • Statement II on RIP • Statement III on Best Practice Study • Statement IV Best Practice Example • Statement V e.g. „whyourorganisationparticipates in such EU Projects; whatdiedwelearnfromeachother“ • Presentationofsuccessfuleco Best Practice Examples • Images ofcooperation (e.g. at WS 5 in Italy)
Project image film • Timeline / TO DOs • Budget
TO DO List / Pending Summary: main important milestones
TO DO List Nice to have but not compulsory
II. Project Work PlanRECOMMENDRIP and Pilot Action Benjamin Kuscher RECOMMEND Project Manager ConPlusUltra GmbH Benjamin.kuscher@conplusultra.com 25th October 2013
Timing of RIP process and pilot actions RIP self- assessment Peer Review RIP-HOW development WS 4 Torun Implementation of Pilot Actions Pilot action field mission Pilot action field mission Pilot action field mission Press Release News Letter Press Release News Letter
Deliverables of each PP • Dissemination of Newsletter / press releases • Development of RIP-HOW • Stakeholder inclusion • Content / Structure / Target Group • Time plan • Self-assessment of RIP • Template comes from LP • Indicators • Implementability • Impact • Participation at field missions • Feedback on content of field missions • Support the organisation • Send experts
Deliverables of Pilot Action Partners • Implement Pilot Action • Report on pilot action • Template comes from LP • Indicators • Impact • Design of field mission January 2014 • Proposal • Collect input from partners • Organise field mission(training) Spring 2014
Peer review • Time: • Spring 2014 • Place: • Italy • Responsible Partner: • PP7 AP • Purpose: • Peer Review: presentation of RIPs self assessment. Discussion between partners and experts on the implementability of the RIP. Final feedback for RIP
RECOMMEND III. FINANCE / REPORTING 25th Oct 2013 Ingrid Rozhon Toruń / PL
AGENDA • Status Quo: 2nd reportingperiod • Status Quo / Feedback: 3rd reportingperiod • Status Quo of financial status quo of each partner after 3rdReport • Timetablefor 4th reportingperiod • Status Quo: 1st & 2nd & 3rd sharedcosts • Questions
Status Quo of 2nd reporting period: • Reporting period: 01st July 2012 – 31st Dec 2012 • Money transfertopartnersbyleadpartner: DONE • AnyQuestions ?
Status Quo3rd Reporting period reportingperiod: 1st Jan 2013 – 30th June 2013 • 1st Oct 2013: Project reportsto JTS (excl. EE report) • Status quo: nofeedbackby JTS so far
Status Quo: expenditure after 3rd RP *) Note: these figures include also the expenditures which EE made during their 3rd Reporting period although these costs have not been officially reported to JTS so far because the signed 3rd Report was not sent in time to LP.
Time table for 4th reporting period: • Reporting period: 1st July 2013 – 31st Dec 2013 • 15th Feb 2014: Partner report & FLC confirmation to LP Incl. 3rd Sharedcostinvoice2013 • 1st April 2014: Project reportsto JTS • June 2014:Expectedpaymentof ERDF contribution
Shared costs Status Quo: 1st Sharedcosts: 1.048,75 EUR
Shared costs Status Quo: 2nd Shared costs: 5.780,98 EUR *) UK Ceed: total depts to Lower Austria: 1.830,76 EUR (6.829,73 EUR – 4.998,97 ERDF part)
Shared costs Status Quo: 3rd Shared costs: EUR
Others: Open Days BXL 2013 • WHO participatedat Open Days 2013? • Anyfeedbackto Open Days 2013?
Open Days BXL 2014 • WHO will participateat Open Days 2014? • Anypossibilitieshowto promote RECOMMEND there?
Ecomondo fair? • WHO will participateatEcomondo fair? • Anypossibilitieshowto promote RECOMMEND there?
Next RECOMMEND WS 5 • Responsiblepartner: PP 07 • Proposalsfordate • Main topics • Outstanding questions?
TO DO List 25th Oct 2013
Feedback round Question I: What have you learnt so far from being a partner in RECOMMEND? Question II: What do you still expect to learn from your membership in RECOMMEND until the project end?
Thankyou foryourattention