150 likes | 233 Views
This analysis focuses on correcting energy deposits to improve kinematics accuracy, with specific corrections for proton and pion energy losses in the IH. Includes event selection with varied cut conditions and correction methods.
E N D
γ+ d → p + p + π-Analysis Y.C.Han@NKS2 Meeting Jan10, 2008
Contents • Energy deposit Correction • Select/Cut Conditions
Energy Deposit Correction • Motivation: get more accurate kinematics • p/pi energy loss in IH bg 0.25~1.6 for proton, 0.5~6 for pion
Energy deposit correction Event Select with loose cut Particle E/p from DC Energy deposit Correction Event Select with tight cut Analysis W/ Correction Energy Deposit Correction Method
Appendix-3 Event Select Condition • Time: |IH-TagF| <2.5nsec; • 2TrVertex: Track Distance<1.5 cm; • 3TrVertex: Triangle length<3.0 cm; • 3TrVerPos: -3<X<2, -1.64<Y<1.44, -1<Z<1 (cm); • Mass: 0.8<ppiMM <1.17, 1.66<LVTarM<2.1 (GeV/c2); • LVTarMom: 119.6<Px<80.4, -103.7<Py<96.3, -50<Px<50 (MeV/c);
Appendix-2 Fig. Effect of Energy Deposit
Appendix-3 Simulation Set GENETYPE: 3BPS ppp - /4BPS ppp -p 0 Gamma E:0.8~1.1 GeV (uniform); Beam Size: YZ-Plane Gaussian distribution w/ σ=0.5 cm; Target: LD2 w/ -3.61<X<0.39 cm Event #:1e6; SDCRES: 150μm ; CDCRES: 200μm ; HDTRES: 0.2 cm; OHZRES: 2.0 cm; DCEFF: 99%; DCEFFREG: 1.2;
Appendix-4 TABLE I. Materials of NKS2 on the Particles’ Trajectory (inside CDC)