slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Olga L. Mayol-Bracero Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Olga L. Mayol-Bracero Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

Olga L. Mayol-Bracero Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 128 Views
  • Uploaded on

Impact of African Dust on Clouds and Precipitation in a Caribbean Tropical Montane Cloud Forest (PRADACS). Olga L. Mayol-Bracero Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus Kickoff Meeting University of Puerto Rico – Río Piedras Campus

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Olga L. Mayol-Bracero Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies' - alodie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Impact of African Dust on Clouds and Precipitation in a Caribbean Tropical Montane Cloud Forest (PRADACS)

Olga L. Mayol-Bracero

Institute for Tropical Ecosystem Studies

University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus

Kickoff Meeting

University of Puerto Rico – Río Piedras Campus

28.February.2010

slide2

Outline

  • Introduction
    • Aerosols-Cloud-Precipitation Interactions
    • Mineral Dust
    • Caribbean Region and Puerto Rico
  • Scientific Question and Hypotheses
  • Experimental Design
  • Education and Outreach
  • Participants
aerosol cloud precipitation climate interactions
Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation-Climate Interactions

Interactions among aerosols, clouds, and precipitation are thought to shape the behavior of the climate system (ACPC).

Aerosols – leading source of uncertainty in the climate forcing

Clouds – largest source of uncertainty in estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity

Precipitation – most poorly quantified yet essential climate variable.

ACP interactions are key aspects for tropical climate research, yet lack of data has limited our understanding of processes occurring in these pristine regions of the world, especially for the Caribbean.

We propose to meet this need by performing field measurements to provide a comprehensive data set on clouds, precipitation, and on cloud-influencing aerosols, particularly from African dust (AD), in a TMCF in the Caribbean.

We envision that our findings will apply not only to the TMCF and PR, but also to other tropical islands and coastal tropical regions that are highly vulnerable to climate change.

ACPC Science Plan and Implementation Strategy

why the interest in tropical montane cloud forests tmcfs
Why the Interest in Tropical Montane Cloud Forests (TMCFs)?

TMCFs that are tightly coupled to the atmospheric hydrologic cycle.

TMCFs are believed to be the most sensitive and vulnerable of the world’s ecosystems to climate change (Lugo and Scatena, 1992, Loope and Gambelluca, 1998).

Relative to lowland tropical forests, TMCFs have persistent cloud or fog cover, reduced solar isolation, low temperatures, low nutrient availability, saturated soils, impeded root respiration, high winds, high humidity, and lower productivity (e.g., Tanner et al. 1992; Scatena, 1995).

Hotspots of biodiversity associated with high levels of endemism (Brown and Kapelle, 2001).

Atmospheric warming is raising the altitude of cloud cover that provides TMCF species with moisture via predictable and prolonged immersion in clouds or rainfall (Pounds et al. 1999), shifting habitats upslope and forcing TMCF species into an increasingly smaller area and even to extinction. (Monteverde, Costa Rica, Pounds et al. 1999, 2006).

TMCFs’ biological diversity and extreme sensitivity to climate change point to their use as an advanced warning system for detecting climate change (Lugo and Scatena, 1992; Benzing, 1998).

Therefore… TMCFs an interesting ecosystem to see the effects AD might have on cloud formation and precipitation.

why the interest in mineral dust african dust ad
Why the Interest in Mineral Dust (African Dust, AD)?
  • Largest sources of dust occur in the NH.
  • Major contributors: Sahara and Sahel emitting 60-200 millions of tons per year.
  • Large amounts are transported by the trade winds over vast areas of the North Atlantic, the Caribbean, and the Amazon Basin. (LRTAD)

Dust particles impact visibility, health, ecosystems, and influence the Earth’s radiative balance by scattering solar radiation in the atmosphere and by affecting cloud formation, and thus, cloud albedo.

ad and ccn
AD and CCN

Cloud radiative properties and rain formation in warm clouds both depend on cloud droplet size distribution (CDSD).

CDSD is determined by aerosol CCN activation spectra and cloud base updraft.

AD is important because it not only changes the number of CCN, but also may provide giant CCN (GCCN) (Teller and Levin 2006) and, thus, has a significant effect on raindrop size and rainfall intensity.

The impact of aerosols on rainfall, cloud lifecycle and cover and eventual energy budget is a primary reason to investigate processes controlling the aerosol CCN activation spectra.

gaps in dust knowledge
Gaps in Dust Knowledge
  • The underlying physico-chemical processes of dust-aerosol interactions
  • Impact on human/ecosystem health
  • Radiative forcing due to dust (IPCC presents large uncertainties); how much dust is emitted?
  • Dust-cloud-precipitation interactions (impact on weather and climate)
    • Reduction (small droplets - less or no coalescence, reduce surface heating – suppresses convection) or increase (GCCN, enhance collision and coalescence) in precipitation (Rosenfeld et al 2001; Teller and Levin 2006; Rosenfeld 2008)
african dust lrtad in the caribbean region
African Dust (LRTAD) in the Caribbean Region

LRTAD affects ecosystems, human health, weather, and climate.

LRTAD particles alter the size distributions and chemical composition of Caribbean aerosols, as well as their water uptake properties (Mayol-Bracero et al. 2006b; Morales-García et al. 2007).

LRTAD has also been linked to a large-scale reduction in precipitation in the Caribbean (Prospero and Lamb, 2003; Angeles et al. 2007) and South Florida (DeMott et al. 2003; Sassen et al. 2003; Toon, 2003).

How aging (chemical and physical properties) impacts cloud properties and climate as the dust particles travel from, for example, Africa to the Caribbean region?

Is African Dust (AD) a major source of tropical hurricane suppression in the Northern Tropical Atlantic due to factors such as cooling of sea surface temperatures in the hurricane main developing region (Lau and Kim 2007) and the Saharan Air Layer (Dunion and Velden, 2004 )?

Caribbean AD events coincide with the midyear dry-wet cycle (June-October) (Griffin et al. 2001a, b; Larsen, 2000). Therefore, does intensification of the frequency and intensity of AD events could magnify dry periods and summer drought?

LRTAD – long-range transported African dust

slide9

Air Masses Origin: Cape San Juan (CSJ)

January 2006 – RICO-PRACS

http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready.html

pcasp mean particle size distribution rico
PCASP - Mean Particle Size Distribution - RICO

Enhancement due to anthropogenic pollution - Jan 20-21 (black line).

Enhancement in the accumulation and coarse modes, most likely due to dust particles - Jan 14-16 (blue line).

PCASP = Passive Cavity Aerosol Spectrometer Probe

Mayol-Bracero et al., in progress

chemical composition of aerosols rico
Chemical Composition of Aerosols - RICO

Cl/Na = 1.45

SO4/Na = 0.77

Ca/Na = 0.077

nss-sulfate = 74 ng m-3

Clean

African dust

Anthrop. NA

Cl/Na = 1.63

SO4/Na = 0.70

Ca/Na = 0.17

nss-sulfate = 128 ng m-3

Cl/Na = 1.11 (sea-spray acidification)

SO4/Na = 2.03

Ca/Na = 0.08

nss-sulfate = 193 ng m-3

Marine Aerosol (Warneck, 1988)

Cl/Na = 1.590 SO4/Na = 0.885 Ca/Na = 0.058

nss-sulfate in remote/clean areas is about 200 ng m-3.

Mayol-Bracero et al., in progress

why the caribbean puerto rico is so attractive for these studies
Why the Caribbean (Puerto Rico) is so Attractive for These Studies?

Located in the subtropics, 18’15 N, 66’30 W

Heavily influenced by the trade winds, by hurricane storm tracks, and by long-range transported African dust (LRTAD) (also volcanic ash)

Key convergence zone between 2 continental landmasses, thus, plays a role in hemispheric climate

Highly undersampled/understudied region

Highly vulnerable to the Earth’s climate change

Presence of tropical montane cloud forests

Two ideal sampling locations: the natural reserve of Cabezas de San Juan, Fajardo (CSJ) and El Yunque National Forest (East Peak , cloud forest - 1051 m)

Large university research center (UPR-RP) within ~60 min drive.

scientific question
Scientific Question

How the physico-chemical properties of long-range transported African dust (LRTAD) aerosols influence Caribbean cloud properties and precipitation levels in a unique Puerto Rican tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF)?

hypotheses
Hypotheses

H1: Cloud properties in the TMCF are different during intense LRTAD periods

H2: LRTAD has unique chemical and physical properties which influence cloud properties and precipitation processes

slide15

Main Sampling Locations in Puerto Rico

CSJ is part of the AERONET, has support from NOAA ESRL, and is a GAW contributing station.

pico este east peak puerto rico 18 o 16 n 65 o 45 w
Pico Este (East Peak), Puerto Rico (18o 16' N, 65o 45' W)

View looking upwind to CSJ, pointed to by the arrow.

Darrel Baumgardner (UNAM) and Stephan Borrmann (MPIC)

Cloud water collector

Kim Prather and her family (2009)

Trailer

slide20
Online Measurements:

CN counter, CCN counter, SMPS, aethalometer, nephelometer, CIMEL sunphotometer, PSAP, OPC, APS, APSD, disdrometer

ATOFMS, AMS

LWC, CVI, visibility sensor, FM-100, webcam system

Analyses:

Gravimetric

Thermal/optical analysis (TC, OC, EC)

Total Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Analyzer (TOC, DOC, TN)

Ion Chromatography (Na+, NH4+, Ca2+, K+, Mg2+, Cl-, NO3- SO42-, acetate, formate, oxalate, and MSA)

ICP (P, K, Mn, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na, Al)

H-NMR

pH, cloud and rain water volumes

Samplers:

Aerosols – Stacked-filter units, low-pressure impactors

Cloud water - Caltech Active Strand Cloud Water Collector (CASCC, mini CASCC)

Rainwater - Bottle and funnel

Meteorological data

Daily Aerosol Optical Thickness Satellite Images from NOAA / NESDIS

Air Mass Backward Trajectories

NOAA ARL HYSPLIT model (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory)

NADP Data

Measurements and Analyses (see attachments)

experimental design
Experimental Design

H1

Measurements: Cloud properties (e.g., droplet concentration (Ndrops), drop size distribution, cloud drop effective radius (Reff), cloud albedo, liquid water content (LWC), cloud base height, composition). These properties are influenced by the characteristics of the aerosol they form upon, thus we would expect cloud properties to be different during LRTAD events.

AVHRR and MODIS satellite images together with HYSPLIT back trajectories and aerosol properties will be used to classify samples according to the presence or absence of LRTAD. We will use this classification to compare cloud properties, wet deposition, and precipitation for LRTAD periods with non-LRTAD periods.

FM-100, LWC-100,

Satellite data from CALIPSO, CloudSat, MISR and TRMMM

Cloud properties combined with cloud occurrence and frequency in the presence and absence of LRTAD will also give an indication of the impact LRTAD is having on climate. These results will allow us to begin understanding the relative effects of LRTAD on cloud formation and precipitation.

experimental design1
Experimental Design

H2

First, we will identify the chemical, physical, and optical properties of LRTAD and differentiate this dust from local aerosol sources. (LRTAD vs non-LRTAD)

ATOFMS, AMS, MOUDI, DLPI, SFUs, CN, CCN, aethalometer, Neph, PSAP, sunphotometer, hygroscopicity,…

Second, we will determine how those unique LRTAD properties affect cloud properties and precipitation processes, and how those properties might explain the observed differences in cloud or rain properties for LRTAD periods found in H1.

use of statistical correlations of residual particles of cloud droplets and interstitial particles with various cloud parameters

Aerosols, clouds, and rainwater samples

CCN-pCVI-ATOFMS

sampling strategy
Sampling Strategy

See attached Work Plan and Tables

Year 1

Test, calibration, and diagnosis year that will allow to begin developing procedures for data analysis and archiving of combined data sets without distractions of a full blown intensive field campaign.

Sampling logistics (e.g., shipping, transport, power, and installations).

Running things side by side to find out the right sampling times, if we need other measurements,...

Train students and technician

Short intensive field period (end of July 2010) to test and fine tune instruments and methods

ATOFMS, nephelometers with the humidification system, new SMPS, OPC, CPC (see attached table of instruments to be deployed).

In summary, Y1 will be a test run that will allow us to run a much stronger large intensive field period in Y2, ensuring the success of the intensive field phase and of the project.

sampling strategy1
Sampling Strategy

Year 2

The intensive field phase of the project will take place in Y2.

July-August (dust period) and Oct-Nov (non-dust period) sampling periods (need to fine tune specific dates). This Oct-Nov period could be either in Y2 or at the beginning of Y3. This needs to be decided today.

See attached table of instruments to be deployed.

Starting in Y2, we will start the search for additional funds to support the completion of the data analyses, as well as to be able to use the data already generated to support the modeling component.

Year 3

Data analysis, presentations and publications.

Modeling

Symposium and workshop

possible aircraft involvement for 2011
Possible aircraft involvement for 2011

Andy Heymsfield (ICE-T – C-130)

Dan Czizco (DOE G-1)

Jason Dunion (NOAA)

Bjoern Stevens (HALO)

pico este advantages for atmospheric and ecological research
Pico Este Advantages for Atmospheric and Ecological Research
  • Suitable for background measurements of different parameters related to ecological and atmospheric sciences in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean Region.
  • Results could be compared with the ones generated at the permanent upwind station that ITES maintains at the natural reserve of CSJ.
  • Research on the long-range transport of pollutants and the incursions of African dust. The marine and hurricane aerosol inputs can be greatly facilitated by PE facilities.
  • Allow the study of clouds without the need of aircrafts and the complexity and costs related to these.
  • At the moment there is no sampling station for atmospheric parameters with the location characteristics and advantages of East Peak in the Caribbean region.
  • Cloud sampling times significantly longer than with aircraft allowing the characterization of the microphysical, chemical and optical properties of aerosols that form small, tropical cumulus clouds.
  • Studies of the evolution of single clouds during their entire lifetime.
  • Chemical analysis of cloud water to link cloud droplet formation and precipitation development to the aerosol source. Probably these are the only cloud/fog/rain measurements that are in the region!
education and outreach
Education and Outreach

Teen’s University – intermediate and high school students (S. Borrmann)

PISCAS program – university students

GK-12

Birch Aquarium (Scripps) – general public

list of participants
List of Participants
  • D. Czizco– PNNL, Washington
  • A. Heymsfield– NCAR, Colorado
  • D. Baumgardner– UNAM, Mexico
  • B. Keene – Univ of Virginia
  • M. Scholl – USGS, Virginia
  • F. Scatena– UPenn
  • A. Lugo – IITF, PR
  • T. Heartsill – IITF, PR
  • B. McDowell – Univ of New Hampshire
  • J. Pett-Ridge – OSU, Oregon
  • Andrew McFadden – UPR-RP ITES

PI: O. L. Mayol-Bracero - UPR-RP ITES

CoPIs: E. Andrews - UC Boulder and NOAA ESRL, K. Prather - UCSD and Scripps

C. Valle, P. Vallejo – UPR-RP Grad students (ITES and Chemistry)

J. Collett - CSU, Colorado

D. Rosenfeld -Hebrew University, Israel

G. Frank - Lund University, Sweden

S. Borrmann -Max Planck Institute for Chemistry – Germany

W. Eugster – ETH, Switzerland

P. Formenti – LISA University, France

S. Raizada – Arecibo Observatory, PR

R. Morales – UPR-RP

I. Matos – NWS San Juan, PR

P. Diaz – USGS, PR