1 / 3

Enhancing Humanitarian Relief Systems: Information Ecology and Central Coordination

Explore the significance of information ecology in humanitarian relief systems, emphasizing increased central coordination, standards, accountability, and knowledge management for long-term proactive strategies. This paper delves into lessons learned, technology infrastructure challenges, and the diverse needs of volunteers and non-profit organizations, proposing common conclusions for effective relief operations.

alice
Download Presentation

Enhancing Humanitarian Relief Systems: Information Ecology and Central Coordination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information ecology Increased central coordination (intra & inter), efficiency, standards, common advocacy, accountability, assessment, lessons learned, knowledge management Long-term, proactive strategy, create infrastructure Lack of technology infrastructure Diversity, flexibility, individual volunteer motivation, non-profit, individual expertise and experience Short-term, rapid response Overall Themes/Tensions for the Paper2/8

  2. Common Conclusions about Humanitarian Relief Systems • ICS focused not on technology but on how people use information to accomplish their goals can help HROs overcome communication and logistical barriers • Need for increased central coordination (without sacrificing what motivates individual volunteers and non-profit organizations) • Need for standards (within diversity) • Need for proactive strategy (in support of reactive operations/emergency response—flexible but not ad hoc) • Need for better advocacy • Need for accountability and assessments

  3. Need for knowledge management and dissemination of lessons learned—moving from solely a “doing” organization to also being a “knowledge” organization More conclusions

More Related