Download
overall n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Overall PowerPoint Presentation

Overall

118 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Overall

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Overall 3 charts w/ Science from 04 to 07 3 charts w/ Reading, Math, and Science during treatment years (05-07) 2 charts for 5th Math and reading (06 & 07) to show those subjects have not suffered with increase science focus

  2. WASL Science Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 869 885 1,023 1,043 Non-NCOSP N= 4,263 3,999 3,865 3,772

  3. WASL Science Scores – 8th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 1,685 1,437 1,363 1,598 Non-NCOSP N= 3,631 3,951 3,850 3,508

  4. WASL Science Scores – 10th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2004 to 2007) NCOSP N= 908 965 1,315 1,356 Non-NCOSP N= 3,648 3,982 3,338 3,739

  5. 5th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)*By Subject% Proficiency *Math and Reading available for only 2006 & 2007

  6. 8th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)*By Subject% Proficiency *Math and Reading available for only 2006 & 2007

  7. 10th Grade WASL Scores (2005-2007)By Subject% Proficiency

  8. WASL Reading Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2006 to 2007)

  9. WASL Math Scores – 5th GradeState vs. non-TL, NCOSP -TL% Proficient (2006 to 2007)

  10. Subgroups • 1 List of subgroups that are consistently and significantly higher w/ TLs • 1 chart w/ effect sizes for significant subgroups • 2 charts w/ proficiencies and scale scores for significant groups • NCOSP TLs represented as colored bars • Non-TLs represented as yellow bars

  11. Subgroups • Subgroups with significantly higher Sci. scale scores that have consistent (or near consistent) results across 5th, 8th, 10th • free-reduced lunch (5-8-10) • Hispanic ethnic group (5-8-10) • Special Education (5-8-10) • Level 1 and Level 2 for same year Math (5-10) • Level 1 and Level 2 on 8th grade sci. WASL (10 –only grade applicable) – not found on 5th to 8th grouping

  12. Subgroups Scoring Significantly Higher with NCOSP TLsEffect Sizes (Larger #s = greater separation between TLs and Non-TLs)

  13. Subgroup Effect Sizes (2005-2007)NCOSP TL vs. Non-TLs Percentile diff. = 5 10 6 7 9 6 6 4 0 0 5 7 7 4 3 10 7 5th Grade 8th Grade 10 Grade Based on scale score T-tests, TL vs. non-TL

  14. Subgroup % Proficient (2005-07)NCOSP TL vs. Non-TL =non-TL =NCOSP TL color 5th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade

  15. Subgroup Scale Scores (2005-07) NCOSP TL vs. Non-TL =non-TL =NCOSP TL color 5th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade

  16. Value-Added • 1 summary chart w/ 5th and 10th “value added” • 2 charts w/ Gains from ’05 8th Gr. to ’07 10th grade Sci. WASL • 1 summarized to 0-1-2 yrs. w/ NCOSP teacher • 1 broken into all the 8( )_10( ) categories

  17. Number of Years with a NCSOP Teacher Leader5th and 10th Grade Science WASL 8th and 10th 4th and 5th 8th or 10th 4th or 5th (2006 & 2007) (2007) 0 yrs. of NCOSP TL N= 7,408 2,949 1 yr. of NCOSP TL N= 1,927 1,819 2 yrs. of NCOSP TL N= 368 327

  18. Gain from 2005 8th Gr. to 2007 10th Grade Science Scale score points (diff. from mean)by Number of Yrs. With NCOSP Teacher N = 1,983 1,497 306 Mean gain score = -8.7 for 3,800 10th grade students in 2007 Significant difference between (0 and 1 groups) and (0 and 2 groups), One way ANOVA test