1 / 37

Water Wave Impact on Ship Structures

UNO Engineering Forum. September 19, 2014. Water Wave Impact on Ship Structures. Christine M. Ikeda, Ph.D . School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Carolyn Judge. Sponsored by:. Outline.

Download Presentation

Water Wave Impact on Ship Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNO Engineering Forum September 19, 2014 Water Wave Impact on ShipStructures Christine M. Ikeda, Ph.D. School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Carolyn Judge Sponsored by:

  2. Outline Acknowledgements: Results shown from the United States Naval Academy were funded by ONR, and the project principal investigator was Carolyn Judge. Special thanks to the Hydromechanics Laboratory Staff at the United States Naval Academy: Dan Rhodes, Mark Pavkov, Bill Beaver, and John Zselecsky Hydrodynamic loading Ship Structure Structural Response A Hydrodynamics Point of View on the Slamming Impacts experienced by High-Speed Craft: Dynamic Pressures • Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited • Tow-Tank Experiments on Planing Craft in Regular Waves Structural Response of Slamming Loads on High-Speed Craft: Full-Field Strain and Deflection Measurements • Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited • Tow-Tank Experiments on Semi-Planing Craft in Regular and Irregular waves. Christine Ikeda 2

  3. Slamming Impacts on High-Speed Marine Vessels Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Research Questions: • Is there a better way to design marine vehicles if we understand the physics of slamming events? • What happens if the bottom of the hull deflects? • How does the use of composites or aluminum in ship-building affect the physics and strength of the hull? Laboratory-scaled experimental studies seeking to provide insight into the physics of the slamming events • Slamming motions and forces are a function of wave topography, impact angle, forward speed, and body orientation during impact • Classic wedge drop experiment with new contributions:Spray Root and high-density pressure measurements • Tow-tank experiments on model-scaled planinghull in different wave conditions

  4. Experimental Details • Acrylic wedge, constructed with 1.3-cm thick plates • Deadrise angle, β = 20° • Dimensions in cm • Length in and out of screen: 60 cm Drop heights ranging from 8 to 64~cm Tekscan Map PCB • Measurements: • Vertical Acceleration: Accelerometer • Vertical position: String Potentiometer • High-Speed Video:Phantom Miro M320S • Pressure on bottom surface High-speed camera • Point Measurements: PCB Piezotronics • Mapping System: Tekscan

  5. Pressure Measurements Point-pressure sensors Single “sensel” or measurement point Field of View for High-speed Camera Pressure mapping system Bottom layout of pressure measurement locations 6 point pressure transducers Pressure mapping system (consists of an array of measurement points)

  6. High-Speed Video New Contribution Video recorded at a speed of 4,000 frames per second and played back at 3 frames per second (1333 times slower than real life)

  7. What was measured? P1 P2 P4 P3 P5 Keel Impact P6 Chine impact measured from videos C. Ikeda, and C. Judge. Impact Pressures and Spray Root Propagation of a Free-Falling wedge. Submitted to Experiments in Fluids, May 2014.

  8. Similarity Solution 7.9 cm 31.8 cm 63.5 cm

  9. Similarity Solution

  10. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 10

  11. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 11

  12. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 12

  13. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 13

  14. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 14

  15. Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 15

  16. Spray Root and Pressure Correlations Increasing Drop Height The lines show the computed spray root position versus time. The symbols show the position of the peak pressure versus time Christine Ikeda 16

  17. High-Speed Craft Experiments performed at the United States Naval Academy

  18. Experimental Facilities Dual flap, servo hydraulic control wavemaker Regular, irregular and transient waves; frequency range 0.3 to 1.4 Hz

  19. Wave Characteristics Tow-speed: 6.4 m/s Bretschneider Spectrum to develop irregular wave model of a Sea State 3 Condition • 9.4 cm significant wave height • 1.7 s modal period Regular Wave field based on the most probable waves from Bretschneider Spectrum • Wave Height: 6.1 cm • Wave Period: 1.1 s

  20. Planing Hull Characteristics • Fixed degrees of Freedom: • Sway, roll, yaw, surge (fixed to carriage) • Free in • Heave, Pitch

  21. Measurements Accelerations • A1triaxial accelerometer (Heave, Sway and Surge) • A2 & A3 Heave (vertical accelerations only) Heave and Pitch measured at the LCG Incoming water surface (encounter wave) at 52 cm in front of the bow Wave Height elevation at 30.5 m from the wavemaker (fixed in tow tank)

  22. Pressure Measurements Point – Pressure Transducers: • PCB Piezotronics Model 113B28 • Range: 344.7 kPa • Temperature effects mitigated with dielectric grease • No hydrostatic pressure reading Pressure Mapping System • Tekscan High-Speed Pressure Mapping System • Range: 690 kPa • Reads hydrostatic pressure

  23. Tow-Speed: 6.4 m/s (12.4 knots), Regular WavesMovie Taken at 400 fps and played back at 10 fpsRun 44

  24. Identification of Single Impact Use of acceleration-time histories to identify a single slam event • Free-fall or zero vertical acceleration followed by short duration high, upward acceleration from slam Heave, Pitch and Wave history • behavior consistent with the slam event characteristics Run 44

  25. Single Impact Event (Run 44)Tow-Speed: 6.4 m/s (12.4 knots), Regular WavesMovie Taken at 400 fps and played back at 2 fps

  26. Pressure Time History Run 44 Must assume that the planing motion is symmetric about the keel Point sensor measurement area: 24 mm2 • Sample Rate: 20kHz Sensel measurement area: 0.64 mm2 • Sample Rate: 730 Hz

  27. Spatial Pressure Correlation Run 44 P23 P23 P22 P22 P21 P21 P21 P21 P22 P22 P23 P23

  28. Spatial Pressure Correlation Run 44 P23 P23 P22 P22 P21 P21 P21 P21 P22 P22 P23 P23

  29. Tow Speed: 9 m/s (17.5 knots), Regular waves2.4-m long modelMovie taken at 1400 fps and played back at 150 fps Christine Ikeda 29

  30. Conclusions and Future Work Wedge Drop Experiment Novel method of quantifying the spray root propagation Pressure measurements correlate well with measured spray root propagation Calculated maximum velocity at impact and verification of similarity solution Understanding of the basic physics of these impact events can allow for the development of design tools and can aid in computer model validation High-Speed Planing Craft 146 total runs with about 15-20 impacts per run  still a work in progress Analysis of pressure measurements show a discrepancy in pressure magnitudes between the two methods, but qualitatively look reasonable Isolating of individual slamming events using vertical acceleration data show there are different types of behavior based on how the ship hits the water surface, curvature of water surface

  31. Structural Response Experiments to be performed at the University of New Orleans

  32. Deflection of Ship Hull Bottoms Ghavami, K. and Khedmati, M.R., Finite Element Analysis - Applications in Mechanical Engineering, 2012 Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Why is this a concern? • Wide-spread use of composite materials in ship-building that are more likely to deflect • High-Speed craft slamming into large waves can severely injury passengers; consider an autonomous craft and focus shifts to not damaging the equipment on-board Research Questions: • How does the pressure-field in the fluid deform the structure? • How does the structure deformation affect the pressure field?

  33. Deflection of Ship Hull Bottoms How can a ship be designed to take into account composite materials or deflections in the hull bottom? Conduct experimental study to determine the strength of the a composite deformable hull • Wedge drop study • Semi-planing study • Use of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) as an non-intrusive way to measure the full field strain on the structure • Use of Stereo DIC will allow for out-of-plane deflection • Continue to explore fluid dynamics of this problem in addition to the structural motions and deformation (What does the spray root behavior look like on high-speed craft?)

  34. Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited Camera 1 Camera 2 Spatial Correlation High-speed cameras t1 t1 t2 t2 Prismatic Wedges with thin-bottom plates: Aluminum Alloys and Composites Traditional measurements such as pressure, acceleration, heave Full-field strain measurements taken with Stereo- Digital Image Correlation to compute out-of-plane deflections Christine Ikeda 34

  35. Semi-Planing Craft in Waves Scale-model hulls with thin-bottoms: Aluminum Alloys and Composites Traditional measurements such as pressure, acceleration, heave, pitch, roll Full-field strain measurements taken with Stereo- Digital Image Correlation to compute out-of-plane deflections Christine Ikeda 35

  36. Final Remarks Off-Shore Wind Turbine Farm, Press-Release Photo from Siemens Off-Shore Wind Turbine Farm, Press-Release Photo from Siemens Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Fluid-Structure Interaction problems are present in many every-day applications. The physics of this interaction is interesting and can provide many new innovations/designs.

  37. References Ikeda, C., Fluid–Structure Interactions: Implosions of Shell Structures and Wave Impact on a Flat Plate. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, August 2012.

More Related