Working Together: ICJ and ICPC Collaboration in Protecting Juveniles

1. Session III: ICJ Working with ICPCPresenters:Rose Ann Bisch (MN)Carla Fults (AAICPC)

2. Objective How do ICJ and ICPC work together? This training will look at current rules and practices regarding how ICJ and ICPC can work together. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

3. Background Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) • Communication • Collaboration • Education • Training * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

4. Question ICPC handles what kinds of cases? • Adoptions • Residential Treatment Facilities • Foster Care • All of the Above * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

5. Question Who handles both ICJ and ICPC cases? • ICJ only • ICPC only • Both ICJ and ICPC * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

6. Question In what kinds of cases may both Compacts be involved? • Runaways • Residential Placements • Family Settings • All of the Above • None of the Above Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

7. ICJ Rules Rule 4-101 • “If a child is placed pursuant to the ICJ and is also subject to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC), placement and supervision through the ICPC would not be precluded.” Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

8. ICJ Rules Rule 6-104 • “ICJ recognizes the authority of ICPC under Article V of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children and supports their authority to return ICPC youth who have runaway from their out-of-state placement resulting in a demand for their return by the sending state. In the event a juvenile is held in a secure facility beyond twenty-four (24) hours (excluding weekends and holidays), the appropriate provisions of the ICJ rules shall apply.” * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

9. Question In what year did the MOU for ICJ and AAICPC become effective? • 2009 • 2011 • 2012 Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

10. Scenarios Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

11. Runaway Scenario A * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

12. Question When a non-delinquent ICPC juvenile runs away from a placement, under what conditions will the return be completed through ICJ? • If the juvenile is held in secure detention for 24 hours or longer • If the juvenile remains in the same state • If the juvenile reports abuse or neglect * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

13. Question A juvenile runs from State (A) to State (B). The juvenile commits a crime in State (B). Who has jurisdiction over the juvenile? • State (A) • State (B) • ICJ • ICPC Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

14. Runaway Scenario B Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

15. Runaway Scenario C * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

16. Question An abuse and neglect court juvenile placed in State (A) runs to State (B). In what situation would ICJ not be involved? • State (A) requests juvenile’s return to State (A) • State (A) requests juvenile remain in State (B) • Both of the Above • Neither of the Above Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

17. Family Scenario A * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

18. Question A juvenile on probation in State (A) claims abuse and neglect in the home. After a home evaluation is completed by ICPC, ICPC proposes to place the juvenile in State (B). ICJ does not approve of the placement. What happens next? • The juvenile is placed in State (B) under ICJ • ICJ becomes involved after the placement occurs • The juvenile is not placed in State (B) * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

19. Question An adjudicated delinquent juvenile with a child abuse and neglect case in State (A) requires and is placed in State (B). ICJ initiates the placement request. The delinquency case closes in State (A). What happens next? • Juvenile remains in State (B) under ICJ • Juvenile remains in State (B) under ICPC • Juvenile returns to State (A) Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

20. Family Scenario B Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

21. Family Scenario C * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

22. Question When a juvenile commits a delinquent act after ICPC placement in another state, ICJ takes over the case. • True • False * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

23. Question When State (A) ICPC places a juvenile of abuse and neglect court in State (B), under what circumstances does ICJ become involved? • State (A) adjudicates juvenile for offense committed in State (A) prior to placement • Juvenile runs away from State (B) to State (C) • Both of the above Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

24. Residential Scenario A Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

25. Residential Scenario B * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

26. Question Who should be responsible for conducting a home evaluation when a delinquent and abuse and neglect juvenile is transferred to the same state as his/her residential program? • ICJ • ICPC • Both * Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

27. Question A juvenile in State (A) under both delinquency and abuse and neglect court is placed in a residential program in State (B) through ICPC. State (A) initiates a transfer request under ICJ for the juvenile to live with his parent in State (B) after the program completes. ICJ and ICPC complete home evaluations. ICJ approves the placement, but ICPC does not. Where does the juvenile go when the program is complete? • The juvenile lives with parent in State (B) under ICJ • The juvenile remains in residential facility until placement is approved • The juvenile is returned to State (A) under ICPC Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

28. Questions?

29. 2014 Rule Proposals

30. Rule Proposals 2014 Rules Committee proposes to amend Rule 2-102: Data Collection 2-102(6): JIDS is fully implemented and functional and can expire; however, one paragraph of the rule is being retained as a reference to requirement for reporting data annually. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

31. Rule Proposals 2014 Rules Committee proposes to amend Rule 3-101: Forms Remove form numbers and names. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

32. Rule Proposals 2014 Rules Committee proposes to rescind Rule 3-102: Optional Forms Unnecessary to denote optional use of forms in rules. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

33. Rule Proposals 2014 West Region proposes to amend Rule 1-101: Definitions Add “including but not limited to detention time” to definition of sanction. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

34. Rule Proposals 2014 West Region proposes to amend Rule 5-101: Supervision/Service Requirements Add “up to and including detention time” to paragraph 3. Serving Juveniles While Protecting Communities

35. Questions?