1 / 20

Learning to Teach through Collaborative and Interactive Activities

Learning to Teach through Collaborative and Interactive Activities. Presented by Doris Shih 施佑芝 Fu-Jen Catholic University. Outline. Rationale Design of Course Activities Website and Sample Projects Future. Rationale. Collaborative Learning.

aileen
Download Presentation

Learning to Teach through Collaborative and Interactive Activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning to Teach throughCollaborative and Interactive Activities Presented by Doris Shih 施佑芝 Fu-Jen Catholic University

  2. Outline • Rationale • Design of Course Activities • Website and Sample Projects • Future

  3. Rationale

  4. Collaborative Learning “The enthusiasm for collaborative learning has become so widespread that most researchers and educators believe that students learn better when they work in groups as compared to when they work autonomously” (Coleman, 1995, p. 137) “collaborative learning promotes higher achievement as well as personal and social development.” (Li, 2002)

  5. Visualization • Visual organizers help learners to recognize & take control of the intellectual processes which bring meaning to the study of academic content (Clarke, 1991; Jonassen, 2000)

  6. Situated Learning • Teaching students through hands-on experience will help conceptualization and thus learning (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989)

  7. Reflective Learning • Online environments furnish space, time, and opportunities for reflective thinking (Bakardjieva & Harasim, 1997; Owston, 1997) • Students became open in discussions and reflected their thoughts in depth (Montgomerie & Harapnuik, 1997)

  8. Design of Course Activities

  9. Stephen Krashen’s 5 Hypotheses • Learning/Acquisition Distinction • Monitor Hypothesis • Natural Hypothesis • Input Hypothesis • Affective Filter Hypothesis

  10. Mini-Lessons • FJU Student-designed lessons for 50 minutes • Sample lesson • “Asking for Directions”

  11. Media Workstations(1/3) • Definition of workstations • An idea from personal workstation (Merrill et al., 1996) • Workstations as learning centers

  12. Media Workstations (2/3) • Sample stations in the Writing to Read center in Kettering City Schools, Ohio (Merrill et al., 1996) • Allow collaboration; using the Internet as tools • Information literacy is necessary in teacher education programs (Asselin & Lee, 2002)

  13. Media Workstations (3/3) • FJU Student-designed media workstations • “Learning English through Stories” • “Delicious Food” • Collaboration with prof. Kate Liu: re-design of the workstations • Learning English through Telling Love Stories • Delicious Food

  14. Online Discussions • Discussion Board • Reflected on issues related to the different teaching methods • Reflected on the use of technology in teaching • Responded to the design of media workstations

  15. Future • Student-teachers were learning by doing • Continue in developing media workstations and online workstations • Use discussion boards to aid collaborative learning (discussion thread record the learning process) (Eastman & Swift, 2002)

  16. References • Asselin, M. & Lee, E. (2002). I wish someone had taught me: Information literacy instruction in a teacher education program. Teacher Librarian, 30(2), 10-17. • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research, 18(1), 32-42. • Clarke, J. H. (1991). Using visual organizers to focus on thinking.Journal of Reading, 34(7), 526-534. • Coleman, E. (1995). Learning by explaining: Fostering collaborative progressive discourse in science. In R. Beun, M. Baker, & M. Reiner (Eds.), Dialogue and instruction: Modeling interaction in intelligent tutoring system, NATO ASI series (pp. 136-147). Belin: Springer-Verlag. • Eastman, J. K., & Swift, C. O. (2002). Enhancing collaborative learning: Discussion boards and chat rooms as project communication tools. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 29-41. • Li, Q. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (4), 503-516.

  17. Thank you!Suggestions please email:dshih@mails.fju.edu.tw

More Related