tuesday week 6 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Tuesday, week 6 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Tuesday, week 6

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 40

Tuesday, week 6 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 147 Views
  • Uploaded on

Tuesday, week 6. Arney on Statistics and Uncertainty Zita on sorting wheat from chaff (Critical thinking tools) Mammograms and “Mind tools” (Gigerenzer) Baloney Detector Kit (Sagan) Theory-laden “facts” (Kuhn) Strong objectivity and situated knowledge (Harding) Looking ahead.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Tuesday, week 6' - aiden


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
tuesday week 6
Tuesday, week 6
  • Arney on Statistics and Uncertainty
  • Zita on sorting wheat from chaff (Critical thinking tools)
    • Mammograms and “Mind tools” (Gigerenzer)
    • Baloney Detector Kit (Sagan)
    • Theory-laden “facts” (Kuhn)
    • Strong objectivity and situated knowledge (Harding)
  • Looking ahead
from harper s index
From Harper’s Index
  • Number of new U.S. soldiers the Army would need in 2006 to replenish ranks abroad: 80,000
  • Percentage of this goal it expects to meet: 9.9
  • Percentage change since 1996 in the average recruitment cost per new U.S. soldier: +84
from harper s index3
From Harper’s Index
  • Number of Palestinian communities that will be surrounded by the new Israeli security fence on at least three sides: 53
  • Chance that a German says Israel’s treatment of Palestinians is the same “in principle” as how Nazis treated Jews: 1 in 2
  • Factor by which the unemployment rate among Jewish immigrants to Germany exceeds the national average: 3.5
  • Percentage of Germans who say, about the Nazi era, that “one should not poke around in old wounds”: 60
from harper s index4
From Harper’s Index
  • Total annual spending controlled by functionally illiterate U.S. consumers: $414,000,000,000
  • Chance that a teacher in a U.S. public school is a man: 1 in 5
  • Average percentage of students in N.Y. State’s majority-white districts who graduate in four years: 79
  • Average percentage who do so in districts where a majority of students are black or Latino: 40
from harper s index5
From Harper’s Index
  • Ratio of the world’s reconstruction aid given to postwar Kosovo, per capita, to that given postwar Afghanistan: 23:1
  • Ratio of the number of peacekeeping troops in Kosovo, per capita, to that in Afghanistan: 24:1

***

  • Amount the U.S spent last year on mosquito nets to fight malaria in Africa: $4,000,000
  • Amount it paid a consultancy to conduct “social marketing” of mosquito nets: $7,900,000
from harper s index6
From Harper’s Index
  • Percentage change in the average monthly price of oil during the Carter Administration: +85
  • Percentage change during the presidency of George W. Bush, before Katrina: +107

* * *

  • Number of consecutive years that the U.S. median income has failed to increase: 5
  • Number of consecutive years that the percentage of Americans living in poverty has increased: 4
slide17

Current Sophomores Who Won’t Graduate*

57.2%

*If the present situation persists.

slide19

John Tukey

Exploratory Data Analysis, 1977

Edward R. Tufte

Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 1983

Envisioning Information, 1990

Visual and Statistical Thinking: Displays of

Evidence for Decision Making, 1997

Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities,

Evidence and Narrative, 1997

The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint, 2003

zita on sorting wheat from chaff critical thinking tools
Zita on Sorting wheat from chaff (Critical thinking tools)
  • Mammograms and “Mind tools” (Gigerenzer)
  • Baloney Detector Kit (Sagan)
  • Theory-laden “facts” (Kuhn)
  • Strong objectivity and situated knowledge (Harding)
mammograms gigerenzer s claims
Mammograms: Gigerenzer’s claims

Risks > benefits

Doctors tell patients that a positive mammogram means:

  • she has cancer and
  • she needs surgery, preferably a mastectomy

Mammogram radiation causes breast cancer.

mammograms ask a doctor
Mammograms: ask a doctor

Test results are NOT simply “positive” and “negative”

but a range of categories:

  • Category 0 - Need additional imaging evaluation. Most category 0 findings are shown to be benign after additional imaging is completed.
  • Category 1 - Negative
  • Category 2 - Benign finding, noncancerous
  • Category 3 - Probably benign finding, short-interval follow-up suggested
  • Category 4 - Suspicious abnormality, biopsy considered
  • Category 5 - Highly suggestive of malignancy, appropriate action needed

“Suspicious abnormality” probably does NOT mean you have cancer! Instead of rush to surgery, Drs recommend:

  • Second, targeted mammogram (spot check)
  • Needle biopsy
  • Surgical biopsy
  • Lumpectomy or mastectomy
what about radiation risk
What about radiation risk?
  • G’s target group is women in their 40’s
  • Mammogram radiation was more dangerous 35 years ago (when target women were teenagers), and is 10 times lower now
  • High radiation took ~20 years to cause cancer (p.69)
  • Most women in their 40’s were not getting mammograms 20 years ago
  • GG says30/100,000 women get cancer from mammograms - or did, when radiation dose was high?
  • (By the way) mammograms save 100 lives per 100,000 women
breast cancer pamphlets g s claims
Breast cancer pamphlets: G’s claims
  • Uncertainties are not acknowledged
  • Risks of screening are not discussed
  • Detection = prevention?
  • Mammograms can be positive or negative
  • Mammogram radiation causes cancer
  • Early detection causes more harm than good, and usually leads to unnecessary surgery (p.58) (but about half of ductal carcinoma in situ will progress to malignancy, if untreated! p.57)

Let’s look at the doctor’s pamphlets…

slide27
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/Patient/page4http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/Patient/page4
slide28
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/Patient/page4http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/breast/Patient/page4
breast cancer pamphlets
Breast cancer pamphlets
  • Uncertainties are acknowledged
  • Risks of screening are explicit
  • Detection ≠ prevention

Some of Gigerenzer’s claims appear to be

  • Internally inconsistent
  • Inconsistent with practice and statistics
  • Supportive of his bias more than “facts”
  • Red flags which make his other claims suspect
baloney detector can help sagan
Baloney Detector can help (Sagan)
  • Counting the hits and forgetting the misses. Ex: “One study shows…”
  • Red herrings and straw men: Emphasized: “3/10,000 (or 3/100,000?) women will develop (mammography-) induced breast cancer (p.70)”; Underemphasized: That was when radiation levels were 10 x higher. 100/100,000 lives are saved by mammography (p.60)
  • Separate variables: women in their 40’s are at very low risk of mammogram-induced cancer
  • False dichotomy: “There is a trade-off between false positives and false negatives (p.70)” – But more highly skilled radiologists should minimize both of these.
tools for skeptical thinking sagan 210
Tools for skeptical thinking (Sagan.210)
  • Independent confirmation of facts
  • Arguments from authority carry little weight
  • Spin multiple hypotheses
  • Suspect your favorite hypothesis
  • Quantify. Predict. Test.
  • Every link in the argument chain must work.
  • Occam’s razor: simpler explanation more likely
  • Untestable hypotheses carry little weight
  • Control experiments and double-blind studies
  • Separate variables
logical fallacies sagan 212
Logical Fallacies (Sagan.212)
  • “ad hominem” – attacking the arguer, not the argument
  • Argument from adverse consequences
  • Appeal to ignorance (absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence
  • Special pleading
  • Begging the question, or Assuming the answer
  • Counting the hits and forgetting the misses
  • Misunderstanding statistics
  • Inconsistency
  • “non sequitur” – it doesn’t follow
logical fallacies sagan 213
Logical Fallacies (Sagan.213)
  • “post hoc, ergo propter hoc” – it happened after, so it was caused by
  • Confusion of correlation with causation
  • False dichotomy, or excluded middle (black and white)
  • Slippery slope
  • Short-term vs long-term
  • Straw men and red herrings
  • Suppressed evidence or half-truths
  • Weasel words
theory laden facts can help kuhn
Theory laden facts can help (Kuhn)

Facts ≠ Truth

Knowledge is CREATED, not discovered

What counts as facts? What counts as a good question to investigate?

“Facts” depend on language, beliefs, framework, …, e.g. paradigm.

Ex: “Early detection of breast cancer does more harm than good” – what counts as harm and good?

strong objectivity can help harding
Strong objectivity can help (Harding)

Knowledge (including science) is created by humans, therefore subjective (Kuhn)

STRONG OBJECTIVITY: first, acknowledge our subjectivities:

  • Biases, language, culture, values, limited perspectives
  • Get input from people with different perspectives

GOALS: Better knowledge and understanding:

  • Empirically more adequate (Kuhn)
  • Less partial and distorted descriptions & explanations

Ex: “Early detection of breast cancer does more harm than good” – from whose perspective?

good statistics can help gigerenzer
Good statistics can help (Gigerenzer)

Use natural frequencies more often than probabilities (though probabilities ARE sometimes simpler)

Use absolute risks more than relative risks

Specify your reference class

Acknowledge prevalence of false positives and false negatives

Overcome the illusion of uncertainty – “dare to know”

take home messages
Take-home messages
  • Use statistics honestly and clearly
  • Beware: facts ≠ Truth
  • Know the contexts and limitations of data and knowledge-creation
  • Acknowledge your bias, agenda, and standpoint, as an analyst and as an author
  • Avoid logical fallacies
  • Use tools for skeptical thinking
  • Encourage readers, patients, doctors, etc. to reason, not to blindly use numbers or formulae
invitation to women interested in physics or teaching
Invitation to women interested in physics or teaching
  • Expanding Your Horizons for middle-school girls - GOALS:
  • Increase young women’s interest in
  • mathematics, science and technology.
  • Provide an opportunity to meet women
  • working in non-traditional fields.
  • Foster awareness of careers for women
  • in mathematics and science-related areas.
  • This Saturday 5 Nov. from 8am-noon at SPSCC
  • Zita will present a workshop on “Magnet Magic”
  • If you are interested in helping at this workshop, please see me after class or email zita@evergreen.edu
  • http://www.starjumper.org/aboutus.html