1 / 13

ECAL_test_Dec_2011

ECAL_test_Dec_2011. INR, Moscow. Standard test bench for ECAL modules test. RUN 00617 .DAT HV 1400 V. RUN 00616 .DAT HV 1350 V. σ = 6.43%. σ = 5.47%. Measurements with standard electronics. ….good agreement with previous Yu.Sobolev measurements.

aideen
Download Presentation

ECAL_test_Dec_2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECAL_test_Dec_2011 INR, Moscow

  2. Standard test bench for ECAL modules test

  3. RUN 00617.DAT HV 1400 V RUN 00616.DAT HV 1350 V σ = 6.43% σ= 5.47% Measurements with standard electronics ….good agreement with previous Yu.Sobolev measurements

  4. Replacement standard ADC on CAEN DT5742 PC CAEN DT5742 12 bit 5 GS/s Switched Capacitor ADC

  5. Module 8, HV 1350 V σ= 6.9% σ= 5.4% Module 8, HV 1400 V Practically the same results with new CAEN ADC and standard ADC

  6. PC CAEN DT5742 12 bit 5 GS/s Switched Capacitor ADC Direct measurements of amplitude and charge of the PMT signal using CAEN DT5742

  7. Module 8, HV 1350V The shape of the signal after PMT EMI-9903KB Resolution of amplitude distribution is worse than charge one due to peaks on the shape of signal

  8. TOFINO shaper PC CAEN DT5742 12 bit 5 GS/s Switched Capacitor ADC Measurements of amplitude of the PMT signal using CAEN DT5742 and TOFINO shaper

  9. Energy resolution (%) for module #8 measured by different methods Method HV(V) GSI Shaper MA8000 + ORTEC ADC GSI Shaper+CAEN ADC Without shaper (CAEN ADC) ADC QDC TOFINO Shaper +CAEN ADC 800 21 1200 10.5 1300 8.1 17.5 11.1 10.5 1350 6.4 6.9 7.3 16 16.6 11.5 11.1 9.9 1400 5.5 5.4 16.1 13.3 Pavel Tlusty: I did similar with the Yokogawa oscilloscope, which also samples the signal. What I found was that I get better resolution after shaping the signal by the MA8000 shaper. Without the shaper, the resolution, both on ADC and QCD was about 10%. With the shaper it was 6.5% == exactly the same as with our ORTEC ADC.

  10. Conclusion Measurement of energy resolution of one of the ECAL module has been done on cosmic using different methods and electronics. Significant difference is found in resolution between direct measurements of amplitude and charge of the signal and resolution measured by using standard electronics with GSI shaper. ADC resolution measured by using TOFINO shaper gives the same result as direct measurements of QDC resolution without shaper. These results confirms our measurements on cosmic we have done at the end of 2010. Here we got resolution about 12% by direct measurement of charge using LeCroy QDC. Unfortunately, we have not enough time to do the same measurement with HAMAMATSU PMT (from TOFINO). This is planned to do in Feb. 2012.

  11. TO DO list Feb_March_ 2012 • 1. The same measurements on cosmic with HAMAMATSU PMT(2’’) and new • PMTs frpm Laura (3’’). with standard electronics and CAEN sampling ADC. • 2. Use new electronics from Poland?

More Related