html5-img
1 / 13

D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair

D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair. Guidelines draft and editing Dr. G. E. Carstens, Texas A&M University Dr. R. A. Hill, University of Idaho Dr. J. A. Basarab, Alberta Agriculture and Food Academic reviewers and discussions

agalia
Download Presentation

D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair

  2. Guidelines draft and editing • Dr. G. E. Carstens, Texas A&M University • Dr. R. A. Hill, University of Idaho • Dr. J. A. Basarab, Alberta Agriculture and Food • Academic reviewers and discussions • Dr. D. Strohbehn, Iowa State University • Dr. R. M. Enns, Colorado State University • Dr. M. Nielsen, University of Nebraska • Industry representatives • Dr. S. Northcutt, American Angus Association • Dr. L. Hyde, North American Limousin Foundation • Dr. R. Williams, American International Charolais Association

  3. General minimum guidelines • Individual feed intake data recording • Reporting of intake and efficiency data • Animal classes • Growing bulls • Steer and heifer progeny • Guidelines document • Posting to the web • Incorporation into BIF guidelines, 9th edition • Guidelines updates

  4. Breed • 3-generation pedigree • Age of dam • Birth date • Birth weight • Weaning date • Weaning weight • Information required for defining feeding contemporary group • Reference to breed association rules

  5. Start of test date • Back-calculate age on test using birth date • This is pre-warmup start date • Age limits should be defined • Weaning is approximately 205 d, with range 175 to 235 d • Minimum age on test should be older than weaning • Animals within a feeding contemporary group • Maximum age range 90-100 d • Pen of feeding will also define CG for intake traits • Dependent on weaning CG size • Target > 5 animals per feeding CG

  6. Adjustment period is typically 21 days • Acclimation to facility and equipment • Diet warmup – transition to final test diet • End of transitional period / start of test will be recorded • Used to define start of intake recording • Longer warmup periods are okay, but probably unnecessary • This will likely be a decision by test managers • Transitional diets for market progeny • Step-up from growing to finishing ration is common • The transition period data can’t generally be used • The goal is to get intake on a constant diet • Research is unclear regarding grow/finish choice with progeny tests but finishing diet is most common

  7. Minimum 70 d after warmup is required • This makes a 91-d minimum total test period • Intake requires less time, but growth requires about 70 d • Animals don’t specifically have to have intake records for all (growth) test days if intake recording equipment usage is an issue • Ad libitum intake is required • Sickness • Days/dates absent from the pen are usually recorded for all animals • Full consumption (ad libitum) should return before recording resumes • Removal of animal(s) from pens • Absence leads to a “non-test-day” and data is set to missing • Working days (weights, RTU) are removed • Equipment failures are also “non-test-day” criteria

  8. No assumptions or restrictions about diet ingredients • These are specific to test location and conditions • Ingredient composition should be recorded • Proximate analysis is also recommended • All animals within a test receive the same diet • Energy density should be sufficient for expression of animal differences • Dry matter content of the diet must be tested • Intake is expressed on a dry-matter basis • Increases comparability with other tests/studies • Minimize measurement variation

  9. Dry matter intake per day is the key measure • Electronic equipment • Follow hardware specifications for animal density • GrowSafe: ~7 (8 ?) young bulls or ~9 steer/heifer progeny per node • Calan: 1 animal per gate • Beginning/end of data recording period • Avoid animals with large missing blocks • Minimum days with intake data • Most studies show 45-50 days or more is sufficient • Some missing data is to be expected, especially with some hardware • Data auditing will remove some data from test days

  10. Recommend > 6 live weights during the test period • Enables the regression of live weight on test day to get ADG • Minimization of measurement error • R2 should be at least 0.90 for these animal regressions, else ADG missing • 2 on / 2 off is less desirable • Easier to collect, but data quality is lower • Serial weights • 14-d intervals are common, but not required • Some test utilize 21- or 28-d weight intervals • Equal spacing seems to be important

  11. Measuring body composition is important • Intake is related to fat / muscle deposition = energy sink • Ultrasound measures of FAT and REA are desirable • Start/end is desirable • If only one ultrasound measure is taken, measure at end of test • Utilize BIF guidelines for ultrasound data collection • Consult and follow breed association specific rules • Data could also support carcass evaluation • Serial ultrasound • Can estimate deposition “curves” for body composition similar to ADG • Multiple measurements on a commercial test will be more expensive

  12. End of test date • Computation of ages and length of test • Test should be completed by 450 d of age • Ensure intake data recording equipment is known • Intake data “audit” • Increases test data integrity • Allows for across-test comparisons • Audits for outliers and potentially biased data • Intake and growth correlations • Within animal variability • Residual feed intake calculations • Equipment failures • Extent is somewhat equipment specific

  13. Denny.Crews@ColoState.edu G-Carstens@tamu.edu RodHill@UIdaho.edu John.Basarab@gov.ab.ca

More Related