1 / 38

Use of ACE Inhibitors in Pregnant Women and the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects

De-Kun Li, MD, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland, California Sponsored by AHRQ DEcIDE TO HHSA290-2005-0033-I -TO3-WA1. Use of ACE Inhibitors in Pregnant Women and the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects. Background.

adrienne
Download Presentation

Use of ACE Inhibitors in Pregnant Women and the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. De-Kun Li, MD, PhD Division of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland, California Sponsored by AHRQ DEcIDE TO HHSA290-2005-0033-I -TO3-WA1 Use of ACE Inhibitors in Pregnant Women and the Risk of Congenital Heart Defects

  2. Background • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs): a class of antihypertensive medications • Widely used for hypertension treatment • Hypertension in pregnancy: 5-10%

  3. Background • Fetal toxicity for use of ACEIs in the 2nd or 3rd trimester • Oligohydramnios • Fetal growth retardation • Pulmonary hypoplasia • Hypocalvaria • Neonatal hypotension • Renal failure • High mortality • Hypotension related

  4. Background • A new study linked ACEI use in the 1st trimester to birth defects (BD) • Increased risk of BDs with ACEI use (RR: 2.7 to 4.4) • No increased risk of BDs with use of other antihypertensives (RR: 0.6 to 0.9) • Compared to all non-users • The increased risk unique to ACEI users

  5. Study Objectives • To replicate the new study finding in a larger and diverse population • Does use of ACEIs during 1st trimester increase the risk of birth defects, especially heart defects and NTDs? • Does timing of the exposure matter? • Is the association unique to ACEI use or to all antihypertensive medications? • Is the medication or hypertension?

  6. Study Population: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) • 3.2 million members • Diverse, representative population • Annual births: 32,000-34,000 • Gestational age recorded • Able to determine gestational age at drug use • Identify pregnancy and labor complications (e.g., PE, PROM, diabetes, infections, fetal distress, placenta previa, abruptio placenta, and seizure)

  7. KPNC Pregnancy & Birth Data • Diabetes registry • Diagnosis of birth defects and other medical conditions in newborns • Regionwide data going back to 1995

  8. KPNC: Drug Exposure Data • All ordered and dispensed ambulatory prescription medications since 1995 • Information on estimated days supply and refill dates/patterns • Some OTC medications

  9. KPNC: Clinical and Admin Databases • Indications and other confounders • Clinical diagnoses (inpatient and ambulatory) • Laboratory test results • Multiple, validated disease registries: diabetes registry, asthma registry, cancer registry, etc • Ability to link to birth certificate info • Access to maternal weight or BMI • EMR in recent years

  10. Study Design • Population-based cohort study of pregnant women • Linkage across clinical diagnosis data, outpatient pharmacy data, laboratory results, and birth certificate data

  11. Exposed Cohort • Pregnant women exposed to ACE inhibitors • Any time during pregnancy • During the first trimester • During the second and third trimesters • During multiple trimesters

  12. Unexposed Cohorts • Three types of comparison groups (controls) • Users of other antihypertensive medications during pregnancy • Pregnant women with a diagnosis of hypertension, but no use of antihypertensives • Pregnant women without a diagnosis of hypertension and use of any antihypertensive medications during pregnancy

  13. Primary Outcome Measures • Live birth • Birth defects • Overall birth defects • Congenital heart defects • Neural tube defects

  14. Linkage Process (1): All livebirths • Identify all live births (birth cohort) • Determine their gestational age • Determine birth type (live vs. still birth)

  15. Linkage Process (2): Identifying Women Exposed to ACEIs and Other drugs • Determine a cohort of medication users • Identify female users of ACEIs during the study period (1995-2008) • Identify female users of other antihypertensive medications during the same study period

  16. Linkage Process (3): Characterizing Drug Exposure among Mothers of liveborns • Linkage between birth cohort and the cohort of medication users • Determine use of ACEI during pregnancy • Determine the timing of ACEI exposure • Determine use of other antihypertensive medications

  17. Linkage Process (4): Identifying Potential Confounders • Linkage to other data sources • Birth Certificates • Other maternal clinical data for weight or BMI • Gestational Diabetes Registry • Clinical data for diagnosis of hypertension

  18. Linkage Process (5): Identifying Birth Defects in Pregnancies >20 Weeks • Identify birth defects up to 13 years of age • Verify diagnoses of birth defects among a random sample of those with birth defects • Over-sample those with exposure to ACE inhibitors

  19. Results • More than 465,816 mother-infant pairs • Prevalence of ACEI use: • 1.8/1,000 any time during pregnancy • 1.0/1,000 during the first trimester • 0.1/1,000 in the 2nd or 3rd trimester • Prevalence of other antihypertensive • 38/1,00 during pregnancy • 3.0/1,000 during the first trimester only • 28.5/1,000 in the 2nd or 3rd trimester

  20. Table 1. Distribution of Selected Maternal Characteristics by Fetal Exposure Status to Antihypertensive Medications during Pregnancy, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California 1995-2008.

  21. Table 1. Distribution of Selected Maternal Characteristics by Fetal Exposure Status to Antihypertensive Medications during Pregnancy, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California 1995-2008.(Cont.)

  22. Table 2. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California 1995-2008

  23. Table 2. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California 1995-2008 (Cont.)

  24. Table 2. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California 1995-2008 (Cont.)

  25. Table 3. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Among Mothers without Preexisting Diabetes, Kaiser Permanente Northern California 1995-2008

  26. Table 3. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Among Mothers without Preexisting Diabetes, Kaiser Permanente Northern California 1995-2008 (Cont.)

  27. Table 3. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, Among Mothers without Preexisting Diabetes, Kaiser Permanente Northern California 1995-2008 (Cont.)

  28. Table 4. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, among Mothers without Preexisting Diabetes, by an underlying diagnosis of hypertension, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California 1995-2008

  29. Table 4. Fetal Exposure to Antihypertensive Medications and the Risk of Major Malformations, among Mothers without Preexisting Diabetes, by an underlying diagnosis of hypertension, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California 1995-2008 (Cont.)

  30. Limitations • Low frequency of ACEI use during pregnancy • No information on compliance • Limited information on confounders • Inability to study individual defects

  31. Strengths • Large study population (almost a half million maternal-infant pairs) • Population-based (every live-birth) • Control for underlying indication (hypertension) • Three types of controls

  32. Confirmation from other studies • Swedish study • A cohort study • Both ACEI and other antihypertensive medications had similarly increased risk of BDs • CDC study • A case-control study • A similar association for both ACEI and other antihypertensive medications • Hypertension also increases the risk

  33. Conclusions • Maternal ACEI use in the first trimester has a risk profile similar to the use of other antihypertensive medications regarding malformations in live-born offspring • Maternal ACEI use in the first trimester has a risk profile similar to underlying hypertension

  34. Conclusions • The apparent increased risk of malformations associated with ACEI use (and use of other antihypertensive medications) in the first trimester is likely due to the underlying hypertension rather than the medications

  35. Important issues in drug safety research • Unlikely to do RCT type studies • Ethical consideration • Pregnancy • Effect on mother • Effect on fetus • Example: antidepressants to PPD • Long-term safety issues

  36. Important issues in drug safety research • Observational studies • Based on existing automated data • Claim data • Clinical data • EMR • Collect original data • Cohort studies: • Expensive • Long-term follow up • Case-control studies • Efficient • Recall issue (errors or biases)

  37. Important issues in drug safety research • Issues related to studies using automated data • Control underlying indication: separate controls • Incomplete ascertainment of exposed women • Drug coverage (outside the system) • Mixed in other drug categories • Sample size issue when exposure is rare, misclassified as non-user, rather than bias • Compliance: can be a problem for rare drug exposure (dilute exposed group) depending on seriousness of underlying conditions.

  38. Important issues in drug safety research • Issues related to studies using automated data • Limited information on confounders • Potential biased ascertainment of conditions with significant under-diagnosis (e.g., depression, ADHD, etc.), users being examined more carefully • Issues related to studies collecting original data • Same principles for cohort and case-control studies • Key: select correct controls.

More Related