Population and society
Download
1 / 31

Population and Society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 247 Views
  • Uploaded on

Population and Society. 4 Major Causes of Environmental Change. Population change Institutions Attitudes, values, belief systems Technological change. Carrying Capacity. The maximum number of organisms an environment can support .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Population and Society' - Sophia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

4 major causes of environmental change l.jpg
4 Major Causes of Environmental Change

  • Population change

  • Institutions

  • Attitudes, values, belief systems

  • Technological change


Carrying capacity l.jpg
Carrying Capacity

  • The maximum number of organisms an environment can support.

  • But highly dependent on technology, there is no set carrying capacity, technology increases production


Thomas malthus 1766 1834 l.jpg
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834)

  • An Essay on Population (1798).

  • Wrote at beginning of the 19th century, when population growth and industry were raising demands for food faster than English agriculture could respond.

  • Human population would always increase exponentially (the larger it gets the faster it grows) while the supply of food and land would only increase “arithmetically” (additively)


Slide5 l.jpg

  • Scarce farmland

  • Overuse of resources

  • Poverty and human misery

  • Each increase in food supply only meant that more people could live in poverty


Cultural carrying capacity l.jpg
Cultural Carrying Capacity

  • “There should be no more people in a country than could enjoy a daily glass of wine and a piece of beef for dinner.” --Thomas Malthus

  • Cultural carrying capacity is smaller

    than simple carrying capacity.


World population growth rates l.jpg
World Population Growth Rates

Population growth rates measured by annual increase in a country’s population are highest in

Africa and Middle East. Growth rates are flat in U.S., Europe, and former Soviet Union


World population growth doubling time l.jpg
World Population Growth Doubling Time

  • 1800-1850 1 billion

  • 1930 2 billion

  • 1960 (30 years) 3 billion

  • 1974 (14 years) 4 billion

  • 1986 (12 years) 5 billion

  • 1999 (13 years) 6 billion


Slide9 l.jpg

  • The current increase of the Earth’s human population in either absolute or relative terms, vastly exceeds the average increases over most of human history.

  • Nobody saw this coming.

  • In1936 demographers predicted that the world population 2.645 billion people by the end of the 21st century (we hit that by 1955).

  • 1950 estimate 3.3 billion by 2000 (off by 50%.)


World population growth l.jpg
World Population Growth either absolute or relative terms, vastly exceeds the average increases over most of human history.

  • Growth rate was at all time peak of 2.1% between 1965-1970 (ThePopulation Bomb by Paul Ehrlich, 1968).

  • Predicted "in the 1970s and 1980s and 1980 hundreds of millions of people will starve to death", that nothing can be done to avoid mass famine greater than any in the history, and radical action is needed to limit the overpopulation. ( a neo-Malthusian position)

  • The growth rate has since declined to about 1.2% per year.


Slide11 l.jpg

  • Global fertility rates are falling: from 5 children per woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • Absolute annual increase in population peaked around 1990 at 86 million and has fallen to 77 million.

  • In 1960, five countries had total fertility rates at or below the required level required to replace the population in the long run.

  • By 2000 there were 64 such countries with 44% of world population


Slide12 l.jpg

The Demographic Transition Model woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • Beginning-High Birth rates, high death rates

  • Transition-High birth rates, low death rates (By 1900, life expectancy at birth was 40-50 years, today it is 78 years for women and 71 for men and rising rapidly).

  • Third Stage-low death rates, low birth rates


Why has the world s population increased by so much l.jpg
Why has the world’s population increased by so much? woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

The Demographic Transition Model

People didn’t start having more babies, more people began to survive.


Demographic transition continued what makes the death rate decrease l.jpg
Demographic Transition Continued woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005What makes the death rate decrease?

  • Increased productivity: agriculture can support larger populations than before

  • Advances in the control of epidemic diseases and improvement in public health, death control: antibiotics, biocide DDT to control insect vectors of infection, vaccines against smallpox, measles, whooping cough, and drugs that cured tuberculosis and malaria


Demographic transition continued what makes the birth rate decrease l.jpg
Demographic Transition Continued woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005What makes the birth rate decrease?

  • As people become urbanized children go from being an economic asset, to becoming an economic burden

  • Cultural norms that encouraged a women to have large numbers of children weakened.

  • Increasing opportunities for women: low status of women=economic dependence and higher birthrates.


The six commandments of population control l.jpg
The Six Commandments of Population Control woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • 1. Promote Contraceptives.

  • 2. Develop Economies

  • 3. Save Children

  • 4. Empower and Educate Women

  • 5. Educate Men

  • 6. Do all of the above


The population debate l.jpg
The Population Debate woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • Neo-Malthusian: our capacity to produce food cannot keep up with our reproductive capacity.

    • Population growth is a severe threat

    • There are limits to the physical capacity of the planet to sustain growth

    • Population growth is also a major cause of environmental degradation


Explaining world hunger l.jpg
Explaining World Hunger woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • Agricultural modernization perspective argues that the world hunger problem is caused by not enough food produced by traditional agriculture

  • Another major factor lies not in the quantity of food, but the distribution of food.


Where is most population growth in the us from l.jpg
Where is most population growth in the US from? woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • According to the census bureau, post-1970 immigrants and their descendents will account for over 80% of US population growth between now and mid 21st century.


Migration population growth in the us l.jpg
Migration: Population Growth in the US woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • 1994: US Commission on Immigration Reform declared: “We disagree with those who would label efforts to control immigration as being inherently anti-immigrant. Rather it is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so it serves national interest.”


Population growth in the us l.jpg
Population growth in the US woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • According to surveys by the Wall Street Journal and the Latino National Political Survey: Clear majorities of African Americans and Latinos favor reductions in legal and illegal immigration.


The politics of population l.jpg
The Politics of Population woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005

  • 1974: The First UN Conference on Population

  • Developing countries rejected the Neo-Malthusian position, that poor countries are poor because of overpopulation.

    • Instead, poverty causes overpopulation.

    • Redistribution of wealth is needed.

    • Birth control vs. wealth control


Slide23 l.jpg


Today s world population l.jpg
Today’s World Population limit population.

  • World POPClock Projection

  • According to the International Programs Center, U.S. Bureau of the Census,

http://opr.princeton.edu/popclock/



How big will the population get trends l.jpg
How Big will the Population Get? Trends Population Growth Rate

  • The global total fertility rate fell from 5 children per woman per lifetime in 1950-55 to 2.7 children in 2000-2005.

  • Absolute annual increase in population peaked around 1990 at 86 million, and more recently is at 77 million

  • 64 countries with 44% of total population now have fertility rates below those needed to replace population


More trends l.jpg
More Trends Population Growth Rate

  • More than half of the annual increase currently occurs in six countries: India, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, and the US (but US only 4%).


Population growth scenarios l.jpg
Population Growth Scenarios Population Growth Rate

  • Fertility at current levels= 12.8 billion by 2050.

  • Medium projection-8.9 billion by 2050 assumes family planning efforts will continue and suceed, fertility continues to drop..

  • Most optimistic prediction7.066 billion


Slide30 l.jpg


Will food production keep up will malthus always be wrong l.jpg
Will Food Production Keep Up? China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, and the US (mostly from immigration)Will Malthus always be Wrong?


ad