slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Heavy Truck Fuel Savings through the application of Surface Wind Forecasts Case Study/Demonstration Robert Wright Plann PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Heavy Truck Fuel Savings through the application of Surface Wind Forecasts Case Study/Demonstration Robert Wright Plann

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Heavy Truck Fuel Savings through the application of Surface Wind Forecasts Case Study/Demonstration Robert Wright Plann - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 333 Views
  • Uploaded on

Heavy Truck Fuel Savings through the application of Surface Wind Forecasts Case Study/Demonstration Robert Wright Planning Systems Incorporated 7923 Jones Branch Drive McLean, Virginia 22102-3304 (703) 734-3446 rwright@plansys.com. CONCEPT. Weather/Wind Forecasts

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Heavy Truck Fuel Savings through the application of Surface Wind Forecasts Case Study/Demonstration Robert Wright Plann' - Sophia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Heavy Truck Fuel Savings

through the application of

Surface Wind Forecasts

Case Study/Demonstration

Robert Wright

Planning Systems Incorporated

7923 Jones Branch Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102-3304

(703) 734-3446

rwright@plansys.com

December 5, 2000

slide2

CONCEPT

  • Weather/WindForecasts
  • - Applied Successfully for Military Aircraft & Ship Operations
  • -- e.g., Optimum Path Aircraft Routing System (Air Transportation)
  • -- e.g., Optimum Track Ship Routing (Sea Transportation)
  • - Forecast Wind Fields Impact Routes/Scheduling -- Optimize for:
  • Minimum Fuel
  • Similar Application for Land Transportation
  • Commercial Heavy Trucking Operations - Long Haul
  • - Determine Optimum (Minimum Fuel) Schedule/Route Based On :
  • Route Forecast Surface Winds (head/tail and cross)
  • Truck Highway Speed
  • Aerodynamic Drag (truck /trailer type and configuration )

December 5, 2000

slide3

CONCEPT

  • Application when Forecast Surface Winds:
  • - Strong(significant impact on fuel consumption)
  • - Change in Time (significant change in fuel consumption)
  • - Verify (reliable prediction of fuel consumption change)
  • Long HaulTrucking Operations:
  • Flexibility = Fuel Savings
  • - Departure Scheduling:
  • -- Take Advantage of Periods of Predicted Minimum Fuel Consumption
  • -- Avoid Periods of Predicted Maximum Fuel Consumption
  • - Route Selection:
  • -- Take Advantage of Routes with Predicted Minimum Fuel Consumption
  • -- Avoid Routes with Predicted Maximum Fuel Consumption
  • -- Applicable for Longer, Cross-Country Routes; use Longer Lead-Time Forecasts

December 5, 2000

slide4

DEMONSTRATION

Fuel Consumption versus Departure Time

December 5, 2000

slide5

DEMONSTRATION

Fuel Consumption versus Departure Time

  • Representative Drive Model
  • - Average Highway Speed: 67 MPH
  • - Total Time: 10 Hours
  • -- 4 Drive Segments:
  • 2 Hours (134.1 Miles)
  • 1 Hour 40 Minutes (111.8 Miles)
  • 2 Hours (134.1 Miles)
  • 1 Hour 40 Minutes (111.8 Miles)
  • -- 3 Intervening Rest Periods
  • 40 Minutes, 1 Hour, 1 Hour
  • Head/Tail Wind Forecast Synchronized
  • with Truck Location/Time
  • - Time-Phased Integration of Drive Model and
  • Forecast Wind Fields

December 5, 2000

slide6

NOAA NWS Daily Weather Map, 05 April 1999/1200Z

Interstate-80

Cheyenne

to Omaha

December 5, 2000

slide7

NOAA NWS Daily Weather Map, 06 April 1999/1200Z

Interstate-80

Cheyenne

to Omaha

December 5, 2000

slide8

MM5 Analysis 05 Apr 99/0600Z

Cheyenne

to

Omaha

Truck Vector

67 MPH

MM5

Grid Line

December 5, 2000

slide9

MM5 Forecast 05 Apr 99/1200Z

Cheyenne

to

Omaha

Truck Vector

67 MPH

MM5

Grid Line

December 5, 2000

slide10

MM5 Forecast 05 Apr 99/1800Z

Cheyenne

to

Omaha

Truck Vector

67 MPH

MM5

Grid Line

December 5, 2000

slide11

MM5 Forecast 06 Apr 99/0000Z

Cheyenne

to

Omaha

Truck Vector

67 MPH

MM5

Grid Line

December 5, 2000

slide12

MM5 Forecast 06 Apr 99/0600Z

Cheyenne

to

Omaha

Truck Vector

67 MPH

MM5

Grid Line

December 5, 2000

slide13

Route Segment Head(-)/Tail(+) Winds

Cheyenne to Omaha

At Indicated Time Time-Phased with Drive Model

[Truck Departs at Indicated Time]

December 5, 2000

slide14

Route Segment Head(-)/Tail(+) Winds

Cheyenne to Omaha

At Indicated Time Time-Phased with Drive Model

[Truck Departs at Indicated Time]

December 5, 2000

slide15

Horsepower Contributions

Horsepower Required to Overcome Aerodynamic Drag and Rolling Friction/Accessories

Class 8 Tractor-Trailer: 80,000 Pounds

  • Assumptions:
  • Cross-Wind Does
  • Not Affect:
  • CD
  • Rolling Friction

Courtesy/Permission Professor Fred Browand

University of Southern California, Los Angeles

DOE Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Project

from A Multi-Year Program Plan for the Aerodynamic

Design of Heavy Vehicles

December 5, 2000

slide16

Relative Wind Fuel Consumption

Fuel Consumption to Overcome Aerodynamic Drag and Rolling Friction/Accessories

Class 8 Tractor-Trailer; 80,000 Pounds

CD = 0.6 Highway Speed: 67 MPH

December 5, 2000

slide18

Operational Implementation

  • National Centers for Environmental Prediction Model
  • Forecast Surface Wind Fields
  • - NOAAPORT NWS Telecommunication Gateway
  • - Eta, Nested Grid Model, Rapid Update Cycle
  • Compute Fuel Consumption as a Function of Possible:
  • - Truck Types/Configurations, Routes, Departure Times
  • Fuel Consumption & Departure Time
  • - Additional Parameters for Load Optimization/Scheduling Programs
  • - For Dispatcher: Wind Optimization Feature ON or OFF
  • For Independent Truckers/Small Trucking Companies
  • - Internet Web Site
  • - Select Truck Type/Configuration, Route, Average Speed
  • - Display Total Fuel Consumption versus Departure Time

December 5, 2000

slide19

Potential Fuel Savings - Complete Study Required

  • Midwest/Great Plains Interstate Highway Routes

December 5, 2000

slide20

Potential Fuel Savings - Study Design/Parameters

  • Fall-through-Spring Period(s)
  • Surface Wind Analyses [e.g., FSL Hourly, 40-Km Rapid Update Cycle]
  • Model/Adjust Surface Winds to Truck Height
  • Interpolate Surface Winds to Interstate Highway Routes
  • Accurate Fuel Consumption Model: Include Cross-Wind Effects
  • - Rolling Friction & Drag Coefficient
  • Tailor to Long Haul Centrally Dispatched Trucking Operations
  • - Type of Trucks/Configurations (drag coefficients)
  • - Route Traffic Density (typical number of trucks scheduled by route)
  • - Daily Departure Times (typical number of departures by time-of-day)
  • - Scheduling Flexibility (allowable change versus lead-time)
  • Metric: Total Fuel Saved versus Change in Departure Time

December 5, 2000