1 / 24

Actuarial Evidence for Dummies and Pension Actuaries Presentation at the Annual General Meeting

Actuarial Evidence for Dummies and Pension Actuaries Presentation at the Annual General Meeting. June 29, 2006 Ottawa, Ontario. Presented by J.M. ("Mel") Norton, FCIA, FSA. CIA Annul Meeting Ÿ Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA. I Revise the Title.

Download Presentation

Actuarial Evidence for Dummies and Pension Actuaries Presentation at the Annual General Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Actuarial Evidence for Dummies and Pension ActuariesPresentation at the Annual General Meeting June 29, 2006 Ottawa, Ontario Presented by J.M. ("Mel") Norton, FCIA, FSA

  2. CIA Annul Meeting ŸAssemblée annuelle de l’ICA I Revise the Title

  3. Marriage Breakdown Valuations 101 for Pension ActuariesPresentation at the Annual General Meeting June 29, 2006 Ottawa, Ontario Presented by J.M. ("Mel") Norton, FCIA, FSA

  4. What Law? Family Law Act is Provincial, based on residence Pension Law may be Federal, Provincial or a 'Statute Plan', based on Employee and Employer's location Income Tax Act

  5. What Law? Primary focus is for Ontario residents, impacted by Ontario's Family Law Act For residents of other provinces, PENSION legislation/regulation may dictate principles of: Valuation; and Division

  6. Family Law Act Each party to a dissolved marriage must: Identify; and Value All assets (and liabilities) at: Separation Marriage

  7. Family Law Act Why? The party whose 'net worth' increased more during marriage must make an equalization payment of 50% of the difference to the other party.

  8. Family Law Act Generally, we are talking only 'legal' marriages, not Common-law relationships Same-gender partners Arguably, 'equalization' does not apply to "other" relationships, although "spousal support" may still apply.

  9. Family Law Act Pension is an Asset that must be valued Rules for Valuing pensions are established by "case law", which recognizes the Standards of the CIA for "marriage breakdown"

  10. Family Law Act For valuation purposes, the 'Pension' Actuary's job should be limited to ensuring that the Plan's "Administrator" discloses, on a timely and accurate basis the plan member's data; and relevant plan terms

  11. What data is required? For 'DC' schemes, generally the pension asset is valued as the 'account balance' – Market Value (accumulated contributions plus investment yields) {less a tax adjustment} Usually, independent values are needed at separation and at marriage Note: The Administrator does not address any applicable 'tax adjustment'

  12. What data is required? - DC It is usually sufficient to use a Member Statement (Annual, Semi-Annual, Quarterly or monthly)…the shorter period, the better) for the period surrounding the Valuation Date (Date of Separation; and Date of Marriage)… or at least proximate to the valuation date

  13. What data is required? (DB) Technically, there is no legal obligation on the Administrator of a Pension Plan to provide any information beyond the Annual Member Statement and a Summary Plan Description or "Booklet", as required by PBA To meet CIA Standards, any "Booklet" needs to describe the 'presumptive' plan (i.e., it must principally provide a history of contractual or 'ad hoc' increases and any 'top-hat' provisions)

  14. What data is required? (DB) The Statement immediately preceding or immediately following the separation date is usually sufficient Most responsible plans go beyond this minimum, and provide salary/service data to a specified separation date May be asked to partition accumulated contributions into "pre" and "post" components

  15. What data is required? (DB) Caveats OK to provide 'updated' "Best Average Earnings", but only if based on 'exact' service DON'T Provide termination or 'transfer' values Calculate 'accrued benefits' (most Administrators do this "wrong" for FLA valuations) Calculate 'service' where the 'separation date' is mid-month, if you would either 'truncate' service at prior month-end; or include 100% of month as service

  16. What data is required? (DB) More "DON'TS" Calculate Final Average YMPE (unless it is based on 'exact' service) Merely include periods of 'credited service' which occurred during marriage...ALL service is needed Fail to reference any potential 'bridge' entitlements, notwithstanding that the member's entitlement may not yet have fully vested Fail to provide accumulated contributions, split pre- and post-transition Provide any "post-separation" adjustments

  17. How data is used Marriage Breakdown (MB) Actuary is responsible to compute 'accrued benefits' at separation MB Actuary uses the Mortality/Interest Rates specified in the CIA Standards (which are now 'much' different than TV assumptions…and are never 'unisex' MB Actuary calculates the Present Value of accrued benefits based on a specified range of retirement dates {Earliest Unreduced <*> Normal} <*>Think of a 'full' grow-in calculation, disregarding interim termination

  18. How data is used Other notable items: SERPs, funded or otherwise, vested or contingent, require valuation SMEPPs are valued as "DB", even though treated as DC for PA purposes Generally, 'case law' has evolved such that enhanced early retirement provisions providing REDUCED pensions, even where providing substantial added value, are ignored in a FLA valuation Since the value is essentially 'traded' against other assets, no post-separation adjustment or update is applied

  19. How data is used Value at separation requires a 'tax reduction' Value at marriage (as per 'case law') is the value at separation, multiplied by a ratio of pre-marriage/total credited service Note: This may seem inconsistent with DC valuations, and inconsistent with actuarial principles {"Best vs. Best"}

  20. Who owns the Pension Asset? A Pension Asset is owned only by the Plan MEMBER…like most other assets (the matrimonialhome being a special exception that by law is jointlyowned) The 'theory' is that the Member retains the pension; and uses 'cash' to meet any equalization obligation It is not unusual that the parties don't have other assets to affect 'equalization', and must therefore partition the pension at source Pension law allows this, usually subject to a "50% earned during marriage" limitation

  21. Separation after retirement Pension is still an Asset, requiring valuation Vested 'spousal survivor benefits' are an Asset of the non-member spouse 50% rule still applies Very conducive to an 'at source' division (must, uponreceipt of a certified copy of a valid Court Order orDomestic Contract) [Very tax effective!]

  22. Non-Pension Financial Assets May include: Retiring Allowances (incl. sick leave 'buy-outs') Stock Stock options (incl. RSUs) …. Generally, not being pension, these assets may need valuation for 'equalization' purposes, but data and Plan terms are 'separate items'

  23. Advising the Pension Actuary's client Review what is currently being done.Most current actions are "wrong" (to a greater or lesser extent), including particularly for almost every Plan being administered by the 'outsourcing' departments of "major actuarial" firms, and virtually all 'public sector' Plans Put together a useful 'response package', addressing all info needed by a MB Actuary {or 'correct' current package!} Respond in a timely manner (5 – 7 business days)

  24. Advising the Pension Actuary's client Review policy about providing PENSION ENTITLEMENTS to a (former) spouse, divorced or otherwise {i.e., implement the CIA's DeferredSettlement Method, as an option available to Members) Cost does increase slightly (2 cheques instead of 1; 2records {linked} instead of 1)…but value to member increases exponentially

More Related