1 / 18

David Hastings Information, Communication and Space Technology Division United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok hastings@un - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :

0: Contents: 0. Overview Stocktaking – the situation is better than one may think Technical situation – several options are available Economic situation – everyone should be able to have access, even if shared.

Related searches for David Hastings Information, Communication and Space Technology Division United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok hastings@un

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'David Hastings Information, Communication and Space Technology Division United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok hastings@un' - RoyLauris

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

  • 0: Contents:

  • 0. Overview

  • Stocktaking – the situation is better than one may think

  • Technical situation – several options are available

  • Economic situation – everyone should be able to have access, even if shared.

  • Institutional situation – role models exist. The Pacific has good opportunities – if it moves soon.

  • Appendices – online only

David Hastings

Information, Communication and Space Technology Division

United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok


1 stocktaking background l.jpg
1: Stocktaking background

Slide3 l.jpg

2: Pacific Islands Socioeconomics – “Bargain knowledge workers”

3 typically expressed challenges now good answers for most l.jpg
3: Typically Expressed ChallengesNow: good answers for most

  • Small populations (is 10+ million people small – compared with success stories like Singapore, Hong Kong, the Eastern Caribbean, Mauritius?).

  • Widely dispersed/isolated (like Atlantic Ocean African cities, Mauritius, the Eastern Caribbean?).

  • About half of ~600 populated islands have telecoms - much of those have 2-way radio. (Solar-powered satellite phone can be cheaper (~40 cents/minute) than current systems for long-distance calling or emergency communication in some economies.)

  • Saddled with legacy “monopolistic” concessions This is a policy which can be maintained or changed. (The eastern Caribbean found that monopolies violate constitutional provisions for freedom of expression, including to receive and disseminate freely).

  • Not attractive to investors (But many are knowledge societies with 90+% literacy and more than competitive wages, or are excellent markets for distance education – Pacific islands are solutions awaiting good partners). Maybe US$80 million/year could be available for investors, if more competitive prices/services were available.

  • Cable and satellite are expensive (Telikom PNG just re-deployed 1st-generation cable for US$11 million. Adding Tonga, Samoa or Vanuatu to existing cabling might cost $4 million each. A new broadband satellite, with local participation, could serve Pacific island states as well as bigger markets. Is it time to pursue such goals?)

4 options l.jpg
4: Options

Slide6 l.jpg

5: An alternative to high-priced 2G cable?

Re-deployed (good quality) 1G cable ~$2-5 million per leg?

“SPIN++” or for US$35-50M, rather than for US$100+M?

Slide7 l.jpg

6: How much for a Pacific satellite? Can it attract markets in Asia, ANZ, Americas?

EDUSAT was built and launched for $65 million. Could 2 EDUSATs serve you?

Pacific island states service centres

Anik F2 spot beams

7 thuraya eco sim usa 20 39 calls coverage area l.jpg
7: Thuraya ECO SIM: USA$.20/.39 calls – coverage area

8 dc powered terminals pcs phones universal service even off the power grid l.jpg
8: DC-powered terminals, PCs, phones(universal service – even off the power grid)

9 economic l.jpg
9: Economic

10 is there enough money to pay for improvements l.jpg
10:Is there enough moneyto pay for improvements?

  • Prof. James McMaster estimated US$66M/year saved by current-model telecoms. 13 Pacific economies.

  • For all economies in this study, we guess US$80M/yr => >US$1.2 Billion over 15 years of cable, satellite.

  • Satellite =>$100-400M? Cable => $50-500M?

  • 15 yr savings => $1200M? => “the money is there” (?)

Slide12 l.jpg

11: A challenge: Falling telecoms prices: Will they bankrupt providers?

(Traffic growth usually outpaces price declines – bringing profits)



12 institutional l.jpg
12: Institutional

13 good experiences satellite l.jpg
13: Good experiences? (satellite)

  • OPT & Telecom Cook Islands – shared satcom bandwidth. Such models can save $$$ elsewhere in the Pacific.

  • Before going for a new satellite, should Pacific consortia try negotiating with Sat-GE-23, AsiaSat, and others (to form a supplier/user consortium) to serve the Pacific safely for less $

  • O3B Networks – sounds good – but details of up-front, marginal (bandwidth, Earth station operations costs), and possible regulatory challenges are needed.

Good experiences? (cable)

Affordable re-deployment of 1st-generation cable?

PNG? Samoa (an update today?)

14 good experiences regulatory etc l.jpg
14: Good experiences? (regulatory, etc.)

  • ECTEL’s Caribbean federation helped small island states build competitive modern telecoms systems.

  • Dominica determined that restriction of telecoms competition infringed onconstitutional freedom of expression. Laws & contracts establishing monopolies were declared unconstitutional, thus void.

  • Competitive mobile phone services/pricing in the Caribbean & elsewhere are dramatically increasing accessibility, even to low-income people.

15 possible next steps l.jpg
15: Possible Next Steps?

  • Short-term?: (a) Forming state-provider user consortia to aggregate user volumes, to obtain more cost-effective group(ed) rates satellite operators for cheaper bandwidth? (PITA is working on this.) (b) be ready to negotiate (cohesively?) with possible cable promoters?

  • Medium-term?: (a) pursue wholesale-able & retail-able affordable infrastructure? (b) pursue services? (c) pursue partnerships toward providing more cutting edge services/pricing? (d) opportunistically pursue cable landings as opportunities may arise?

  • Longer-term?: (a) pursue a satellite, and additional marketable services? (b) pursue additional retailers, who could become your customers for wholesaling services?

16 summary l.jpg
16: Summary

  • Typically expressed challenges – Now: good answers for most.

  • Is there enough money to pay for improvements?Yes.

  • Do governments have to pay for or subsidize infrastructure or customers?No.

  • Good experiences to adapt? – how to leverage for the Pacific?

    • Monopolies – (1) Found to be unconstitutional impingement of freedom of expression in the Caribbean. Laws, contracts were declared void. (2) Competitors DO want to come into small economies, where opportunity exists. (3) A single provider CAN act competitively – but supportive practices, and accountability, need to be in place.

    • Are people offering you a cable for $50-150 million? How about $3-15 million as happened for PNG?Are they offering landings for $3 million?(How about being a part owner if you must capitalize the system, as was done for WASC in Africa)?

    • Short-term satellite – groups arranging for better collective deals? It happened in .pf and .ci. Western Pacific – 40-cent/minute international satcom phone calls? (Thuraya ECO system.)

    • Longer-term: Can the Pacific get a satellite, also generating revenue from Pacific rim economies? Something like this was offered to the Pacific, but “not responded to”. It could be offered again. Satellites are often costed at $300+ million. But they have been built/launched for < $100 million.

  • Pacific decisionmakers could use a colleague network to make good decisions, and to design, build, operate and support good modern telecoms.

  • How to benefit from cooperation?: The Pacific has many regional cooperative institutions, among governments & service providers. At Noumea in March (2008), a strategy for moving forward, using the Pacific Plan Digital Strategy, was sketched. Is this what you also think? Are more resources useful? I wish I were with you for the rest of the day, as you discuss this and other issues on moving forward.

Thank you l.jpg

17: For the Pacific – is it time to better leverage regional cooperation toward affordable “universal service?”

For several other non-ideally connected economies. Maybe there is a little of the Pacific (‘s problems) in you, and a little of you (‘re problems) in the Pacific? Is there an opportunity to strengthen your own situation through greater cooperation?

Thank You!

David Hastings (author-speaker): hastingsd@un.org (to 31 December)

roi@earthling.net (after 31 December)

WU Guoxiang (ESCAP, Bangkok): wugu@un.org