Cs267 applications of parallel computers lecture 1 introduction
Download
1 / 52

CS267 Applications of Parallel Computers Lecture 1: Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 389 Views
  • Uploaded on

CS267 Applications of Parallel Computers Lecture 1: Introduction. Horst D. Simon hdsimon@lbl.gov http://www.nersc.gov/~simon. Outline. Introduction Large important problems require powerful computers Why powerful computers must be parallel processors

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'CS267 Applications of Parallel Computers Lecture 1: Introduction' - Rita


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Cs267 applications of parallel computers lecture 1 introduction l.jpg

CS267Applications of Parallel ComputersLecture 1: Introduction

Horst D. Simon

hdsimon@lbl.gov

http://www.nersc.gov/~simon

CS267-Lecture 1


Outline l.jpg
Outline

  • Introduction

  • Large important problems require powerful computers

  • Why powerful computers must be parallel processors

  • Principles of parallel computing performance

  • Structure of the course

CS267-Lecture 1



Simulation the third pillar of science l.jpg
Simulation: The Third Pillar of Science

  • Traditional scientific and engineering paradigm:

    • Do theory or paper design.

    • Perform experiments or build system.

  • Limitations:

    • Too difficult -- build large wind tunnels.

    • Too expensive -- build a throw-away passenger jet.

    • Too slow -- wait for climate or galactic evolution.

    • Too dangerous -- weapons, drug design, climate experimentation.

  • Computational science paradigm:

    • Use high performance computer systems to simulate the phenomenon

      • Base on known physical laws and efficient numerical methods.

CS267-Lecture 1


Some particularly challenging computations l.jpg
Some Particularly Challenging Computations

  • Science

    • Global climate modeling

    • Astrophysical modeling

    • Biology: genomics; protein folding; drug design

    • Computational Chemistry

    • Computational Material Sciences and Nanosciences

  • Engineering

    • Crash simulation

    • Semiconductor design

    • Earthquake and structural modeling

    • Computational fluid dynamics

    • Combustion

  • Business

    • Financial and economic modeling

    • Transaction processing, web services and search engines

  • Defense

    • Nuclear weapons -- test by simulations

    • Cryptography

CS267-Lecture 1


Units of measure in hpc l.jpg
Units of Measure in HPC

  • High Performance Computing (HPC) units are:

    • Flop/s: floating point operations

    • Bytes: size of data

  • Typical sizes are millions, billions, trillions…

    Mega Mflop/s = 106 flop/sec Mbyte = 106 byte

    (also 220 = 1048576)

    Giga Gflop/s = 109 flop/sec Gbyte = 109 byte

    (also 230 = 1073741824)

    Tera Tflop/s = 1012 flop/sec Tbyte = 1012 byte

    (also 240 = 10995211627776)

    Peta Pflop/s = 1015 flop/sec Pbyte = 1015 byte

    (also 250 = 1125899906842624)

    Exa Eflop/s = 1018 flop/sec Ebyte = 1018 byte

CS267-Lecture 1


Economic impact of hpc l.jpg
Economic Impact of HPC

  • Airlines:

    • System-wide logistics optimization systems on parallel systems.

    • Savings: approx. $100 million per airline per year.

  • Automotive design:

    • Major automotive companies use large systems (500+ CPUs) for:

      • CAD-CAM, crash testing, structural integrity and aerodynamics.

      • One company has 500+ CPU parallel system.

    • Savings: approx. $1 billion per company per year.

  • Semiconductor industry:

    • Semiconductor firms use large systems (500+ CPUs) for

      • device electronics simulation and logic validation

    • Savings: approx. $1 billion per company per year.

  • Securities industry:

    • Savings: approx. $15 billion per year for U.S. home mortgages.

CS267-Lecture 1


Global climate modeling problem l.jpg
Global Climate Modeling Problem

  • Problem is to compute:

    f(latitude, longitude, elevation, time) 

    temperature, pressure, humidity, wind velocity

  • Approach:

    • Discretize the domain, e.g., a measurement point every 10 km

    • Devise an algorithm to predict weather at time t+1 given t

  • Uses:

    • Predict major events, e.g., El Nino

    • Use in setting air emissions standards

Source: http://www.epm.ornl.gov/chammp/chammp.html

CS267-Lecture 1


Global climate modeling computation l.jpg
Global Climate Modeling Computation

  • One piece is modeling the fluid flow in the atmosphere

    • Solve Navier-Stokes problem

      • Roughly 100 Flops per grid point with 1 minute timestep

  • Computational requirements:

    • To match real-time, need 5x 1011 flops in 60 seconds = 8 Gflop/s

    • Weather prediction (7 days in 24 hours)  56 Gflop/s

    • Climate prediction (50 years in 30 days)  4.8 Tflop/s

    • To use in policy negotiations (50 years in 12 hours)  288 Tflop/s

  • To double the grid resolution, computation is at least 8x

  • State of the art models require integration of atmosphere, ocean, sea-ice, land models, plus possibly carbon cycle, geochemistry and more

  • Current models are coarser than this

CS267-Lecture 1



Comp science a 1000 year climate simulation l.jpg
Comp. Science : A 1000 year climate simulation al., LLNL

  • Warren Washington and Jerry Meehl, National Center for Atmospheric Research; Bert Semtner, Naval Postgraduate School; John Weatherly, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab Laboratory et al.

  • A 1000-year simulation demonstrates the ability of the new Community Climate System Model (CCSM2) to produce a long-term, stable representation of the earth’s climate.

  • 760,000 processor hours used

  • http://www.nersc.gov/aboutnersc/pubs/bigsplash.pdf

CS267-Lecture 1


Comp science high resolution global coupled ocean sea ice model l.jpg
Comp. Science: High Resolution Global Coupled Ocean/Sea Ice Model

  • Mathew E. Maltrud, Los Alamos National Laboratory; Julie L. McClean, Naval Postgraduate School.

  • The objective of this project is to couple a high-resolution ocean general circulation model with a high-resolution dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice model in a global context.

  • Currently, such simulations are typically performed with a horizontal grid resolution of about 1 degree. This project is running a global ocean circulation model with horizontal resolution of approximately 1/10th degree.

  • Allows resolution of geographical features critical for climate studies such as Canadian Archipelago

  • http://www.nersc.gov/aboutnersc/pubs/bigsplash.pdf

CS267-Lecture 1


Parallel computing in web search l.jpg
Parallel Computing in Web Search Model

  • Functional parallelism: crawling, indexing, sorting

  • Parallelism between queries: multiple users

  • Finding information amidst junk

  • Preprocessing of the web data set to help find information

  • General themes of sifting through large, unstructured data sets:

    • when to put white socks on sale

    • what advertisements should you receive

    • finding medical problems in a community

CS267-Lecture 1


Document retrieval computation l.jpg
Document Retrieval Computation Model

  • Approach:

    • Store the documents in a large (sparse) matrix

    • Use Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), or related algorithms to “partition”

    • Needs large sparse matrix-vector multiply

  • Matrix is compressed

  • “Random” memory access

  • Scatter/gather vs. cache miss per 2Flops

# documents ~= 10 M

24 65 18

x

# keywords

~100K

Ten million documents in typical matrix.

Web storage increasing 2x every 5 months.

Similar ideas may apply to image retrieval.

CS267-Lecture 1


Transaction processing l.jpg
Transaction Processing Model

(mar. 15, 1996)

  • Parallelism is natural in relational operators: select, join, etc.

  • Many difficult issues: data partitioning, locking, threading.

CS267-Lecture 1



Technology trends microprocessor capacity l.jpg
Technology Trends: Microprocessor Capacity Model

Moore’s Law

2X transistors/Chip Every 1.5 years

Called “Moore’s Law”

Gordon Moore (co-founder of Intel) predicted in 1965 that the transistor density of semiconductor chips would double roughly every 18 months.

Microprocessors have become smaller, denser, and more powerful.

Slide source: Jack Dongarra

CS267-Lecture 1


Impact of device shrinkage l.jpg
Impact of Device Shrinkage Model

  • What happens when the feature size shrinks by a factor of x ?

  • Clock rate goes up by x

    • actually less than x, because of power consumption

  • Transistors per unit area goes up by x2

  • Die size also tends to increase

    • typically another factor of ~x

  • Raw computing power of the chip goes up by ~ x4 !

    • of which x3 is devoted either to parallelism or locality

CS267-Lecture 1


Microprocessor transistors l.jpg
Microprocessor Transistors Model

CS267-Lecture 1


Microprocessor clock rate l.jpg
Microprocessor Clock Rate Model

CS267-Lecture 1



Sia projections for microprocessors l.jpg
SIA Projections for Microprocessors Model

Compute power ~1/(Feature Size)3

1000

100

Feature Size

(microns)

10

Feature Size

(microns) & Million

Transistors per chip

Transistors per

1

chip x 10**(-6)

0.1

0.01

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Year of Introduction

based on F.S.Preston, 1997

CS267-Lecture 1


But there are limiting forces increased cost and difficulty of manufacturing l.jpg

But there are limiting forces: Increased cost and difficulty of manufacturing

Moore’s 2nd law (Rock’s law)

Demo of 0.06 micron CMOS

CS267-Lecture 1


How fast can a serial computer be l.jpg
How fast can a serial computer be? of manufacturing

  • Consider the 1 Tflop/s sequential machine:

    • Data must travel some distance, r, to get from memory to CPU.

    • Go get 1 data element per cycle, this means 1012 times per second at the speed of light, c = 3x108 m/s. Thus r < c/1012 = 0.3 mm.

  • Now put 1 Tbyte of storage in a 0.3 mm x 0.3 mm area:

    • Each word occupies about 3 square Angstroms, or the size of a small atom.

1 Tflop/s, 1 Tbyte sequential machine

r = 0.3 mm

CS267-Lecture 1


Microprocessor transistors and parallelism l.jpg
Microprocessor Transistors and Parallelism of manufacturing

Thread-Level

Parallelism?

Instruction-Level

Parallelism

Bit-Level

Parallelism

CS267-Lecture 1


Automatic parallelism in modern machines l.jpg
“Automatic” Parallelism in Modern Machines of manufacturing

  • Bit level parallelism: within floating point operations, etc.

  • Instruction level parallelism (ILP): multiple instructions execute per clock cycle.

  • Memory system parallelism: overlap of memory operations with computation.

  • OS parallelism: multiple jobs run in parallel on commodity SMPs.

    There are limitations to all of these!

    Thus to achieve high performance, the programmer needs to identify, schedule and coordinate parallel tasks and data.

CS267-Lecture 1


The opportunity dramatic advances in computing terascale today petascale tomorrow l.jpg
The Opportunity: Dramatic Advances in Computing of manufacturingTerascale Today, Petascale Tomorrow

IBM “Blue Gene”

Innovative Designs

1,000

MICROPROCESSORS

2x increase in microprocessor speeds every 18-24 months

(“Moore’s Law”)

PARALLELISM

More and more processors being used on single problem

INNOVATIVE DESIGNS

Processors-in-Memory

HTMT

Increased Use of Parallelism

100

Peak Teraflops

10

Microprocessor Advances

1

0.1

1996

2006

1998

2000

2002

2004

CS267-Lecture 1


Technology trends in parallel computers l.jpg

Technology Trends in Parallel Computers of manufacturing

CS267-Lecture 1


Slide29 l.jpg

Nevertheless, the microprocessor revolution will continue with little attenuation for ~10 years.

Microprocessors have made desktop computing in 2000 what supercomputing was in 1990.

Massive Parallelism has changed the “high end” completely.

Today clusters of Symmetric Multiprocessors are the standard supercomputer architecture.

CS267-Lecture 1


A parallel computer today nersc 3 vital statistics l.jpg
A Parallel Computer Today: NERSC-3 Vital Statistics with little attenuation for ~10 years.

  • 5 Teraflop/s Peak Performance – 3.05 Teraflop/s with Linpack

    • 208 nodes, 16 CPUs per node at 1.5 Gflop/s per CPU

    • “Worst case” Sustained System Performance measure .358 Tflop/s (7.2%)

    • “Best Case” Gordon Bell submission 2.46 on 134 nodes (77%)

  • 4.5 TB of main memory

    • 140 nodes with 16 GB each, 64 nodes with 32 GBs, and 4 nodes with 64 GBs.

  • 40 TB total disk space

    • 20 TB formatted shared, global, parallel, file space; 15 TB local disk for system usage

  • Unique 512 way Double/Single switch configuration

CS267-Lecture 1


Top500 june 2002 see www top500 org l.jpg
TOP500 – June 2002 (see www.top500.org) with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Top500 performance l.jpg

My Laptop with little attenuation for ~10 years.

TOP500 - Performance

CS267-Lecture 1


Manufacturers l.jpg
Manufacturers with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Manufacturers34 l.jpg
Manufacturers with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Processor type l.jpg
Processor Type with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Chip technology l.jpg
Chip Technology with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Architectures l.jpg

CM2 with little attenuation for ~10 years.

Cluster of Sun HPC

Paragon

T3D

CM5

T3E

SP2

ASCI Red

Y-MP C90

SX3

Sun HPC

VP500

Architectures

CS267-Lecture 1


Now cluster l.jpg
NOW - Cluster with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


Why do we have only commodity components l.jpg
Why do we have only commodity components? with little attenuation for ~10 years.


Dead supercomputer society l.jpg

ACRI with little attenuation for ~10 years.

Alliant

American Supercomputer

Ametek

Applied Dynamics

Astronautics

BBN

CDC

Convex

Cray Computer

Cray Research

Culler-Harris

Culler Scientific

Cydrome

Dana/Ardent/Stellar/Stardent

Denelcor

Elexsi

ETA Systems

Evans and Sutherland Computer

Floating Point Systems

Galaxy YH-1

Goodyear Aerospace MPP

Gould NPL

Guiltech

Intel Scientific Computers

International Parallel Machines

Kendall Square Research

Key Computer Laboratories

MasPar

Meiko

Multiflow

Myrias

Numerix

Prisma

Thinking Machines

Saxpy

Scientific Computer Systems (SCS)

Soviet Supercomputers

Supertek

Supercomputer Systems

Suprenum

Vitesse Electronics

Dead Supercomputer Society


Warm up homework assignment l.jpg

Warm Up Homework Assignment with little attenuation for ~10 years.

CS267-Lecture 1


The parallel computing challenge improving real performance of scientific applications l.jpg
The Parallel Computing Challenge: with little attenuation for ~10 years.improving real performance of scientific applications

Peak Performance is skyrocketing

  • In 1990’s, peak performance increased 100x; in 2000’s, it will increase 1000x

    But ...

  • Efficiency declined from 40-50% on the vector supercomputers of 1990s to as little as 5-10% on parallel supercomputers of today

  • Close the gap through ...

    • Mathematical methods and algorithms that achieve high performance on a single processor and scale to thousands of processors

    • More efficient programming models for massively parallel supercomputers

    • Parallel Tools

  • 1,000

    Peak Performance

    100

    Performance

    Gap

    Teraflops

    10

    1

    Real Performance

    0.1

    1996

    2000

    2004

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Performance levels l.jpg
    Performance Levels with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Peak advertised performance (PAP)

      • You can’t possibly compute faster than this speed

    • LINPACK (TPP)

      • The “hello world” program for parallel computing

    • Gordon Bell Prize winning applications performance

      • The right application/algorithm/platform combination plus years of work

    • Average sustained applications performance

      • What one reasonable can expect for standard applications

        When reporting performance results, these levels are often confused, even in reviewed publications

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Performance levels for example on nersc 3 l.jpg
    Performance Levels (for example on NERSC-3) with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Peak advertised performance (PAP): 5 Tflop/s

    • LINPACK (TPP): 3.05 Tflop/s

    • Gordon Bell Prize winning applications performance : 2.46 Tflop/s

      • Material Science application at SC01

    • Average sustained applications performance: ~0.4 Tflop/s

      • Less than 10% peak!

    CS267-Lecture 1


    First assignment l.jpg
    First Assignment with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • See home page for details.

    • Find an application of parallel computing and build a web page describing it.

      • Choose something from your research area.

      • Or from the web or elsewhere.

    • Create a web page describing the application.

      • Describe the application and provide a reference (or link)

      • Describe the platform where this application was run

      • Find peak and LINPACK performance for the platform and its rank on the TOP500 list

      • Find performance of your selected application

      • What ratio of sustained to peak performance is reported?

      • Evaluate project: How did the application scale? What were the major difficulties in obtaining good performance? What tools and algorithms were used?

    • Send us (Horst and David) the link and add the webpage to your portfolio

    • Due next week, Thursday (9/5).

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Course organization l.jpg

    Course Organization with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Schedule of topics l.jpg
    Schedule of Topics with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Introduction

    • Parallel Programming Models and Machines

      • Shared Memory and Multithreading

      • Distributed Memory and Message Passing

      • Data parallelism

    • Sources of Parallelism in Simulation

    • Tools

      • Languages (UPC)

      • Performance Tools

      • Visualization

      • Environments

    • Algorithms

      • Dense Linear Algebra

      • Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)

      • Particle methods

      • Load balancing, synchronization techniques

      • Sparse matrices

    • Applications: biology, climate, combustion, astrophysics

    • Project Reports

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Reading materials l.jpg
    Reading Materials with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Some on-line texts:

      • Demmel’s notes from CS267 Spring 1999, which are similar to 2000 and 2001. However, they contain links to html notes from 1996.

        • http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~demmel/cs267_Spr99/

      • Yelick’s notes from Fall 2001

        • http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~dbindel/cs267ta/

      • Ian Foster’s book, “Designing and Building Parallel Programming”.

        • http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/dbpp/

    • Recommended text:

      • “Sourcebook for Parallel Computing”, by Dongarra, Foster, Fox, ..

        • Available in bookstores in November 2002; now available as a reader or on CD;

    • Potentially Useful

      • “Performance Optimization of Numerically Intensive Codes” by Stefan Goedecker and Adolfy Hoisie

        • This is a practical guide to optimization, mostly for those of you who have never done any optimization

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Other topics or interest l.jpg
    Other Topics or Interest with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Field Trips

      • NERSC Visualization lab, Thursday, October 3 confirmed

      • Silicon Valley/Computer History Museum, Tuesday, November 26 ?

    • Projects

      • MATLAB anyone? There is a parallel MATLAB available on seaborg

      • Student Volunteer at SC2002 in Baltimore, November 16 – 22, 2002

        • http://hpc.ncsa.uiuc.edu:8080/sc2002/svol_registration.html for the student volunteer program

        • http://www.sc2002.org for the conference

    • Also of interest:

      • ACTS Parallel Tools Workshop for Students in Berkeley, Sept. 4 – 7, 2002 see http://acts.nersc.gov/workshop ; send e-mail to Osni Marques at oamarques@lbl.gov to register; about five spots available for CS267

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Requirements l.jpg
    Requirements with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Fill out on-line account request for Millennium machine.

      • See course web page for pointer

    • Fill out request for NERSC account

      • Form available in class

    • Fill out survey

      • e-mail to David if you missed this lecture

    • Build a portfolio

      • Every week or two students will report explorations, ideas, proposed work, and work to the TA via an organized webpage, document or notebook.

      • There will be about four programming assignments geared towards hands-on experience, interdisciplinary teams.

      • There will be a Final Project

        • Teams of 2-3, interdisciplinary is best.

        • Interesting applications or advance of systems.

        • Presentation (poster session)

        • Conference quality paper

    CS267-Lecture 1


    What you should get out of the course l.jpg
    What you should get out of the course with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    In depth understanding of:

    • When is parallel computing useful?

    • Understanding of parallel computing hardware options.

    • Overview of programming models (software) and tools.

    • Some important parallel applications and the algorithms

    • Performance analysis and tuning

    CS267-Lecture 1


    Administrative information l.jpg
    Administrative Information with little attenuation for ~10 years.

    • Instructors:

      • Horst D. Simon, 329 Soda, hdsimon@lbl.gov, (510) 486-7377

      • TA: David Garmire, 566 Soda, strive@eecs.berkeley.edu, (510) 643 6763

    • Accounts – fill out online registration for Millenium; fill out form for NERSC accounts on seaborg

    • Class survey – fill out today

    • Lecture notes are based on previous semester notes:

      • Jim Demmel, David Culler, David Bailey, Bob Lucas, Kathy Yelick and myself

    • Reader based on “Sourcebook for Parallel Computing”; hardcopy or CD option

    • Discussion section: Wed. 1:30 – 2:30 in 405 Soda; not every week

    • Most class material and lecture notes are at:

      • http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~strive/cs267

    CS267-Lecture 1