1 / 20

Generalised scaling in a male donkey

Generalised scaling in a male donkey. Author: Mark Craig. Editor: David Lloyd. © European Society of Veterinary Dermatology. History. 10-year-old entire male donkey First signs Reduced appetite, weight loss, generalised scaling In progress over a 3-month period Treatment by referring vet

PamelaLan
Download Presentation

Generalised scaling in a male donkey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Generalised scaling ina male donkey Author: Mark Craig Editor: David Lloyd © European Society of Veterinary Dermatology

  2. History • 10-year-old entire male donkey • First signs • Reduced appetite, weight loss, generalised scaling • In progress over a 3-month period • Treatment by referring vet • Intramuscular penicillin/streptomycin daily for 10 days • No improvement Click to reveal the text on this screen Click the forward arrow to jump to the next screen History

  3. Clinical signs - 1 • Generalised exfoliative erythroderma • Thin, depressed • Rectal temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate normal • No peripheral lymphadenopathy • No oral lesions were present Signs

  4. Clinical signs - 2 • The donkey is thin and depressed • There is poor coat with generalised scaling Signs

  5. Clinical signs - 3 Exfoliation and erythema of the scrotum Periocular scaling and greasy matted hair around the eye Signs

  6. Clinical signs - 4 Close up of scaling, matting of coat and underlying erythema Signs

  7. How would youapproach this case? • What are the next steps you would take? • Make a list of your principle differential diagnoses • List any samples you would collect • List any tests you would perform to assist in making a definitive diagnosis Signs

  8. Differential diagnoses • Bacterial infection including dermatophilosis • Dermatophytosis • Pemphigus foliaceus, SLE • Drug eruption • Cutaneous lymphoma Differentials

  9. Tests - 1 • Skin scrapings • Blood tests: routine haematological and biochemical screens • Fungal culture of scale and hairs • Multiple skin biopsy samples Tests

  10. Tests - 2 • Scrapings did not reveal ectoparasites or fungal structures • Scales/crusts were emulsified and smears examined for bacteria including Dermatophilus; no significant findings • Haematology: marked leukocytosis (35.1 x 103/mm3) with neutrophilia and lymphocytosis, slightly reduced RBC count. • Blood biochemistry: raised total protein, hyperglobulinaemia, raised ALP and CK Tests

  11. What now? • What treatment should you now institute, if any, whilst waiting for the fungal cultures and biopsy results? • What are now your principle differential diagnoses? • Are there any other samples you would collect? Tests

  12. Tests - 3 • No immediate action taken • No parasites or evidence of dermatophytes demonstrated in scrapings • Smears failed to reveal significant bacteria • The leucocytosis (neutrophilia + lymphocytosis) were suggestive of possible bacterial infection but the blood biochemistry results were not diagnostic • Antibacterial therapy might have been instituted but was inhibited by cost and because no significant deterioration was expected before biopsy results were available Tests

  13. Histopathology Results An interface dermatitis pattern predominated, possible indicating lupus or a drug eruption Tests

  14. What is yourdiagnosis? • Do the investigations permit a definitive diagnosis? • Are there any additional investigations which you think may need to be done Tests

  15. Further steps • Consultation with the pathologist • The histological picture was not clear and the pathologist suggested a second opinion supported by immunohistochemical studies Tests

  16. Histopathology Results Another view of the histopathology showing lichenoid infiltration and microabscess formation with predominantly mononuclear cells Tests

  17. Diagnosis • Subsequent immunohistochemical studies showed a strong reaction to CD-3 of infiltrating cells. • A diagnosis of epidermotropic lymphoma was made Tests

  18. How would you deal with this case? • What is your prognosis? • How will you advise the owner? • What treatment would you consider? Therapy

  19. Prognosis • Prognosis is grave • Disease is fatal • Steroids and cytotoxic drugs are unlikely to be helpful • Euthanasia was carried out Therapy

  20. Review • If you would like to review this case, please use the navigation buttons below Notes

More Related