1 / 17

IDSF New Judging System

IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009 Concept Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval Possibility of phase by phase implementation Improved objectivity of marking Improved transparency Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

IDSF New Judging System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009

  2. Concept • Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC approval • Possibility of phase by phase implementation • Improved objectivity of marking • Improved transparency • Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public • Provides constructive feedback to athletes and trainers

  3. Changes needed • Establishing the criteria - clear definitions • Establishing a numerical marking scale • Changing the format of the competition • Creating appropriate software and hardware • Changing the mindset of all participants involved

  4. IDSF New judging System • Programme Components Score PCS • First draft ready for discussion and testing • General Deductions • First draft ready for discussion and testing • Technical Elements Score • Not ready due to lack of technical definitions

  5. PROGRAMME COMPONENTS • 5 COMPONENTS – CRITERIA • PB Posture, Balance, Coordination • QM Quality of Movement • MM Movement to music • PA Partnering • CP Choreography and Presentation

  6. PB – Posture, Balance, Coordination • Posture and Poise • Body line, shape, design • Hold or Holds • Positions and transitions • Balance • Static- Dinamic • Individual- Couple • Coordination of movement

  7. QM – Quality of Movement • Actions • General • Style specific • Dynamics • Flow • Weight • Time • Space

  8. MM – Movement to Music • Time • Tempo • Rhytmical structure • Phrasing • Timing • Musicality

  9. PA - Partnering • Physical connection • Communication without physical connection • Appropriateness • Effectiveness • Consistency

  10. CP - Choreography and Presentation • Well balanced choreography • Content • Space • Partnering • Level of difficulty • Atmosphere • Creativity • Expression • Interpretation

  11. Screen- JDSF system

  12. Marking scale 10 Outstanding 9 Superior 8 Very Good 7 Good 6 Above Average 5 Average 4 Fair 3 Weak 2 Poor 1 Very Poor

  13. General Deductions • Balance loss • Momentary • Frequent • Fall • Delayed start • Early finish • Loss of connection • Momentary • Frequent or long • Dancing out of time • Momentary • Frequent or long • Discontinuation • Momentary • Frequent or long • Error • Momentary • Frequent

  14. PCS Phase 1 • Programme components ( Criteria) • Presentation Stuttgart • Discussion • Corrections • Test event • Discussion • Corrections

  15. PCS Phase 2 • Involving a wider panel of experts to create a final content of program components • Further presentations at IDSF adjudicators congresses • Further testing -to be decided by the Presidium of IDSF • Presentation to the IDSF 2010 AGM • Discussion • Changes( if required ) • Motion for approval to the 2011 IDSF AGM

  16. PCS Phase 3 • Education and training of IDSF Adjudicators • Implementation in IDSF events • World Championships • IOC events

  17. Technical Elements Score • Parallel developement of the system for TES • Technical definitions of dance figures • Latin? • Compulsory figures? • Assigning base value to each figure – level of difficulty • Deciding on the scale of deductions

More Related